Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

eHealth initiatives; the relationship between project work and institutional practice

Authors: Line Lundvoll Warth, Kari Dyb

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Large-scale, national eHealth services, such as the summary care record (SCR) and electronic prescriptions (e-prescriptions), have been implemented by project managers as Norwegian health authority initiatives. Few studies have been conducted on the large-scale implementation of eHealth services and the relationship between the implementers’ work and the use of the tools in healthcare practices. Hence, there was a need to determine the project work with a focus on changes in practice. This study explores the implementation of the SCR and e-prescriptions from the perspective of project managers; how does the implementation work by project managers relate to institutional practices in large-scale initiatives?

Methods

Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were held with project managers in 2016 and 2018 and were recorded, transcribed, and coded according to the content. The analytical concepts of the “project” and “practice” were used to focus on tensions between the dimensions of time connecting historically established social practice and in situ actions.

Results

The eHealth initiatives were demonstrated to have been implemented as a part of the national strategy and achieved through close collaboration with the Norwegian Directorate of eHealth (NDE). Tensions arose in relation to task-oriented actions during the implementation of the project and the daily management thereafter. Further, the work tasks of the project managers were related to the dissemination of the tools while, in practice, the tools were related to actual use by professionals. The implementation of several projects simultaneously created tensions between the implementation of a tool and a specific practice, as well as between tools.

Conclusion

The objectives set out by the project managers in relation to their work should be viewed as temporary, whereas a long-term objective should apply to the use of the tools. Hence, the work of implementing eHealth initiatives might call for a renewed definition of the empirical object. Identifying factors that affect uptake, such as gaps between the intended use of an object and in situ actions or historically established activities, might expedite the future success of national eHealth initiatives. The social aspect of institutional practice has a direct bearing on the potential of a project to be implemented successfully.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(6):650–72.CrossRef Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(6):650–72.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235.CrossRef Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chantler T, Lwembe S, Saliba V, Raj T, Mays N, Ramsay M, et al. “It’s a complex mesh” - how large-scale health system reorganisation affected the delivery of the immunisation programme in England: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:489.CrossRef Chantler T, Lwembe S, Saliba V, Raj T, Mays N, Ramsay M, et al. “It’s a complex mesh” - how large-scale health system reorganisation affected the delivery of the immunisation programme in England: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:489.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.CrossRef Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):146.CrossRef Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):146.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Murray E, Burns J, May C, Finch T, O’Donnell C, Wallace W, Mair F. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6:6.CrossRef Murray E, Burns J, May C, Finch T, O’Donnell C, Wallace W, Mair F. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6:6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kierkegaard P. Governance structures impact on eHealth. Health Policy Technol. 2015;4(1):39–46.CrossRef Kierkegaard P. Governance structures impact on eHealth. Health Policy Technol. 2015;4(1):39–46.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mair FS, May C, Murray E, Finch T, Murray E, Anderson G, Sullivan F, O’Donnell C, Wallace P, Epstein O. Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(1_suppl):36–7.CrossRef Mair FS, May C, Murray E, Finch T, Murray E, Anderson G, Sullivan F, O’Donnell C, Wallace P, Epstein O. Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(1_suppl):36–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates DW. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(12):848–54.CrossRef Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates DW. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(12):848–54.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hallgren M, Soderlund J. In: Morris PWG, Pinto JJ, Soderlund J, editors. The Oxford handbook of project management Projects-as-practice: new approach, new insight. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 500–18.CrossRef Hallgren M, Soderlund J. In: Morris PWG, Pinto JJ, Soderlund J, editors. The Oxford handbook of project management Projects-as-practice: new approach, new insight. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 500–18.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lalonde P-L, Bourgault M, Findeli A. An empirical investigation of the project situation: PM practice as an inquiry process. Int J Proj Manag. 2012;30:407–17.CrossRef Lalonde P-L, Bourgault M, Findeli A. An empirical investigation of the project situation: PM practice as an inquiry process. Int J Proj Manag. 2012;30:407–17.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smyth HJ, Morris PWG. An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: methodological issues. Int J Proj Manag. 2007;25:423–36.CrossRef Smyth HJ, Morris PWG. An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: methodological issues. Int J Proj Manag. 2007;25:423–36.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Winter M, Smith C, Morris PS, Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int J Proj Manag. 2006;24:638–49.CrossRef Winter M, Smith C, Morris PS, Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int J Proj Manag. 2006;24:638–49.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morris P. The management of projects. New York: Thomas Telford publishing; 1997. Morris P. The management of projects. New York: Thomas Telford publishing; 1997.
19.
go back to reference Engeström Y. from teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.CrossRef Engeström Y. from teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roth W-M, Lee Y-J. “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: cultural-historical activity theory. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(2):186–232.CrossRef Roth W-M, Lee Y-J. “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: cultural-historical activity theory. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(2):186–232.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A. Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:62–9.CrossRef Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A. Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:62–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e9–e13.CrossRef Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e9–e13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pope C, Halford S, Turnbull J, Prichard J, Calestani M, May C. Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: study using normalisation process theory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:111.CrossRef Pope C, Halford S, Turnbull J, Prichard J, Calestani M, May C. Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: study using normalisation process theory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:111.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dyb K, Warth LL. The Norwegian National Summary Care Record: a qualitative analysis of doctors’ use of and trust in shared patient information. BMC Health Services Res. 2018;18(1):252.CrossRef Dyb K, Warth LL. The Norwegian National Summary Care Record: a qualitative analysis of doctors’ use of and trust in shared patient information. BMC Health Services Res. 2018;18(1):252.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Warth LL, Dyb K. A qualitative study of the implementation and use of a national information system. Paper presented at. MCCSIS 2017. Proceedings of the international conference E-health; 2017 July 20–23; Lisbon: Portugal. New York: Curran Associates; 2017. p. 3–10. Warth LL, Dyb K. A qualitative study of the implementation and use of a national information system. Paper presented at. MCCSIS 2017. Proceedings of the international conference E-health; 2017 July 20–23; Lisbon: Portugal. New York: Curran Associates; 2017. p. 3–10.
31.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003.
32.
go back to reference Eisenhart M. Generalization from qualitative inquiry. IK Ercikan, WM Roth generalizing from educational research: beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (s. 51–66). New York: Routledge; 2009. Eisenhart M. Generalization from qualitative inquiry. IK Ercikan, WM Roth generalizing from educational research: beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (s. 51–66). New York: Routledge; 2009.
33.
go back to reference Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning: En innføring. Aurskog, Tano Aschehoug; 1996. Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning: En innføring. Aurskog, Tano Aschehoug; 1996.
34.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2014. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2014.
35.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK: Transaction Publishers; 2009. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK: Transaction Publishers; 2009.
36.
go back to reference Kvale S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Ad Notam Gyldendal; 1997. Kvale S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Ad Notam Gyldendal; 1997.
37.
go back to reference Engestrӧm Y. From stabilization of knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Manag Learn. 2007;38(3):271–5.CrossRef Engestrӧm Y. From stabilization of knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Manag Learn. 2007;38(3):271–5.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Miettinen R, Virkkunen J. Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization. 2005;12(3):437–56.CrossRef Miettinen R, Virkkunen J. Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization. 2005;12(3):437–56.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Engeström Y. Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interact Comput. 2008;20(2):256–9.CrossRef Engeström Y. Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interact Comput. 2008;20(2):256–9.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference De Bont A, Bal R. Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:47.CrossRef De Bont A, Bal R. Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:47.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference O’Leary T, Williams T. Managing the social trajectory: a practice perspective on project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2013;60(3):566–80.CrossRef O’Leary T, Williams T. Managing the social trajectory: a practice perspective on project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2013;60(3):566–80.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cresswell K, Coleman J, Slee A, Williams R, Sheikh A. ePrescribing Programme team. Investigating and learning lessons from early experiences of implementing ePrescribing systems into NHS hospitals: a questionnaire study. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53369.CrossRef Cresswell K, Coleman J, Slee A, Williams R, Sheikh A. ePrescribing Programme team. Investigating and learning lessons from early experiences of implementing ePrescribing systems into NHS hospitals: a questionnaire study. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53369.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
eHealth initiatives; the relationship between project work and institutional practice
Authors
Line Lundvoll Warth
Kari Dyb
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4346-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue