Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

Development of a managed clinical network for children’s palliative care – a qualitative evaluation

Authors: Andrew Papworth, Lorna Fraser, Jo Taylor

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Consistent evidence suggests that children’s palliative care is not equitable and managed clinical networks (MCNs) have been recommended as a solution. This study explored the perspectives of health professionals involved in the development of a children’s palliative care MCN, with an aim to identify barriers and enablers of successful implementation.

Methods

Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 45 healthcare staff with a role in developing the MCN or in the delivery of children’s palliative care (September 2019–March 2020).

Results

The study explored health professionals’ perceptions of the MCN features that had helped to formalise governance processes, establish training and networking opportunities, standardise practice, and improve collaboration between organisations. These include the funded MCN co-ordinator, committed individuals who lead the MCN, and a governance structure that fosters collaboration. However, the MCN’s development was impeded by cross-cutting barriers including limited funding for the MCN and children’s palliative care more generally, no shared technology, lack of standards and evidence base for children’s palliative care, and shortage of palliative care staff. These barriers impacted on the MCN’s ability to improve and evaluate palliative care provision and affected member engagement. Competing organisational priorities and differences between NHS and non-NHS members also impeded progress. Training provision was well received, although barriers to access were identified.

Conclusions

Key features of children’s palliative care can act as barriers to developing a managed clinical network. Managing expectations and raising awareness, providing accessible and relevant training, and sharing early achievements through ongoing evaluation can help to sustain member engagement, which is crucial to a network’s success.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Craft A, Killen S. Palliative care services for children and young people in England. An Independent review for the Secretary of State. London: Department of Health; 2007. Craft A, Killen S. Palliative care services for children and young people in England. An Independent review for the Secretary of State. London: Department of Health; 2007.
4.
go back to reference Fraser L, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, et al. ‘Make every child count’: estimating current and future prevalence of children and young people with life-limiting conditions in the United Kingdom. York: Martin House Research Centre; 2020. Fraser L, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, et al. ‘Make every child count’: estimating current and future prevalence of children and young people with life-limiting conditions in the United Kingdom. York: Martin House Research Centre; 2020.
7.
go back to reference Joy I. Valuing short lives: children with terminal conditions (a guide for donors and funders). London: New Philanthropy Capital; 2005. Joy I. Valuing short lives: children with terminal conditions (a guide for donors and funders). London: New Philanthropy Capital; 2005.
8.
go back to reference Taylor J, Booth A, Beresford B, et al. Specialist paediatric palliative care for children and young people with cancer: A mixed methods systematic review. Palliat Med. 2020; In Press. Taylor J, Booth A, Beresford B, et al. Specialist paediatric palliative care for children and young people with cancer: A mixed methods systematic review. Palliat Med. 2020; In Press.
9.
go back to reference Hunt A, Coad J, West E, et al. The big study for life-limited children and their families: final research report. Bristol: Together for Short Lives; 2013. Hunt A, Coad J, West E, et al. The big study for life-limited children and their families: final research report. Bristol: Together for Short Lives; 2013.
12.
go back to reference Connor S, Bermedo M, editors. Global atlas of palliative Care at the end of life. London: Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance; 2014. Connor S, Bermedo M, editors. Global atlas of palliative Care at the end of life. London: Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance; 2014.
16.
29.
go back to reference Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2009. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2009.
32.
go back to reference NVivo qualitative data analysis software [program]. 12 version, 2018. NVivo qualitative data analysis software [program]. 12 version, 2018.
38.
go back to reference Miech E, Rattray N, Flanagan M, et al. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:1–11.CrossRef Miech E, Rattray N, Flanagan M, et al. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:1–11.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Fraser LK, Jarvis S, Moran N, et al. Children in Scotland requiring palliative care: identifying numbers and needs (the ChiSP study). York: University of York; 2015. Fraser LK, Jarvis S, Moran N, et al. Children in Scotland requiring palliative care: identifying numbers and needs (the ChiSP study). York: University of York; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Development of a managed clinical network for children’s palliative care – a qualitative evaluation
Authors
Andrew Papworth
Lorna Fraser
Jo Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00712-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Palliative Care 1/2021 Go to the issue