Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-06-2015 | Research article

What are the reasons for clinical network success? A qualitative study

Authors: Elizabeth McInnes, Mary Haines, Amanda Dominello, Deanna Kalucy, Asmara Jammali-Blasi, Sandy Middleton, Emily Klineberg

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinical networks have been established to improve patient outcomes and processes of care by implementing a range of innovations and undertaking projects based on the needs of local health services. Given the significant investment in clinical networks internationally, it is important to assess their effectiveness and sustainability. This qualitative study investigated the views of stakeholders on the factors they thought were influential in terms of overall network success.

Method

Ten participants were interviewed using face-to-face, audio-recorded semi-structured interviews about critical factors for networks’ successes over the study period 2006–2008. Respondents were purposively selected from two stakeholder groups: i) chairs of networks during the study period of 2006–2008 from high- moderate- and low-impact networks (as previously determined by an independent review panel) and ii) experts in the clinical field of the network who had a connection to the network but who were not network members. Participants were blind to the performance of the network they were interviewed about. Transcribed data were coded and analysed to generate themes relating to the study aims.

Results

Themes relating to influential factors critical to network success were: network model principles; leadership; formal organisational structures and processes; nature of network projects; external relationships; profile and credibility of the network.

Conclusions

This study provides clinical networks with guidance on essential factors for maximising optimal network outcomes and that may assist networks to move from being a ’low-impact’ to ‘high-impact’ network. Important ingredients for successful clinical networks were visionary and strategic leadership with strong links to external stakeholders; and having formal infrastructure and processes to enable the development and management of work plans aligned with health priorities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haines M, Brown B, Craig J, D’Este C, Elliott E, Klineberg E, et al. Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–10.CrossRef Haines M, Brown B, Craig J, D’Este C, Elliott E, Klineberg E, et al. Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cunningham F, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–13.CrossRef Cunningham F, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–13.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hamilton KE, Sullivan FM, Donnan PT, Taylor R, Ikenwilo D, Scott A, et.al. A managed clinical network for cardiac services: set-up, operation and impact on patient care. International J Integrated Care. 2005;5:1–13. Hamilton KE, Sullivan FM, Donnan PT, Taylor R, Ikenwilo D, Scott A, et.al. A managed clinical network for cardiac services: set-up, operation and impact on patient care. International J Integrated Care. 2005;5:1–13.
4.
go back to reference Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care. 2005;43(5):471–9.CrossRefPubMed Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care. 2005;43(5):471–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tolson D, McIntosh J, Loftus L, Cormie P. Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):183–95.CrossRefPubMed Tolson D, McIntosh J, Loftus L, Cormie P. Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):183–95.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Nagarajan S, Statnikov Y, Modi N. Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e2105 Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Nagarajan S, Statnikov Y, Modi N. Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e2105
7.
go back to reference Addicott R, McGivern G, Ferlie E. Networks, organizational learning and knowledge management: NHS cancer networks. Public Money Manag. 2006;26(2):87–94.CrossRef Addicott R, McGivern G, Ferlie E. Networks, organizational learning and knowledge management: NHS cancer networks. Public Money Manag. 2006;26(2):87–94.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McInnes E, Middleton S, Gardner G, Haines M, Haertsch M, Paul C, et al. A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McInnes E, Middleton S, Gardner G, Haines M, Haertsch M, Paul C, et al. A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Making wicked problems governable? The case of managed networks in health care. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Making wicked problems governable? The case of managed networks in health care. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
10.
go back to reference Willem A, Gemmel P. Do governance choices matter in health care networks? An exploratory configuration study of health care networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Willem A, Gemmel P. Do governance choices matter in health care networks? An exploratory configuration study of health care networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ahgren B, Axelsson R. Determinants of integrated health care development: chains of care in Sweden. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2007;22(2):145–57.CrossRef Ahgren B, Axelsson R. Determinants of integrated health care development: chains of care in Sweden. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2007;22(2):145–57.CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Braithwaite J, Goulston K. Turning the health system 90° down under. Lancet. 2004;364(9432):397–9.CrossRefPubMed Braithwaite J, Goulston K. Turning the health system 90° down under. Lancet. 2004;364(9432):397–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Spencer A, Ewing C, Cropper S. Making sense of strategic clinical networks. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(11):843–5.CrossRefPubMed Spencer A, Ewing C, Cropper S. Making sense of strategic clinical networks. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(11):843–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pettigrew A, Ferlie E, McKee L. Shaping strategic change ‐ the case of the NHS in the 1980s. Public Money Manag. 1992;12(3):27–31.CrossRef Pettigrew A, Ferlie E, McKee L. Shaping strategic change ‐ the case of the NHS in the 1980s. Public Money Manag. 1992;12(3):27–31.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hendy J, Barlow J. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(3):348–55.CrossRefPubMed Hendy J, Barlow J. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(3):348–55.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Currie G, Gladman J, Lockett A, Waring J, White L. The knowledge brokering role of middle level managers (MLMs) in service innovation: managing the translation gap in patient safety for elderly care. In: NIHR service delivery and organisation programme. 2011. Currie G, Gladman J, Lockett A, Waring J, White L. The knowledge brokering role of middle level managers (MLMs) in service innovation: managing the translation gap in patient safety for elderly care. In: NIHR service delivery and organisation programme. 2011.
19.
go back to reference Long J, Cunningham F, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long J, Cunningham F, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Marks D, Westbrook J, et al. Social-professional networks of health professionals: A systematic review. Sydney: Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, 2010. Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Marks D, Westbrook J, et al. Social-professional networks of health professionals: A systematic review. Sydney: Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, 2010.
21.
go back to reference McDonald R. Leadership and leadership development in healthcare settings - a simplistic solution to complex problems? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(5):227–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald R. Leadership and leadership development in healthcare settings - a simplistic solution to complex problems? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(5):227–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Oliver K, De Vocht F, Money A, Everett M. Who runs public health? A mixed methods study combining qualitative and network analysis. J Public Health. 2013;35(3):453–9.CrossRef Oliver K, De Vocht F, Money A, Everett M. Who runs public health? A mixed methods study combining qualitative and network analysis. J Public Health. 2013;35(3):453–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What are the reasons for clinical network success? A qualitative study
Authors
Elizabeth McInnes
Mary Haines
Amanda Dominello
Deanna Kalucy
Asmara Jammali-Blasi
Sandy Middleton
Emily Klineberg
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1096-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue