Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Care | Original Research

A New Standard for Advance Care Planning (ACP) Conversations in the Hospital: Results from a Delphi Panel

Authors: Deepika Mohan, MD, MPH, Olivia A. Sacks, MD, James O’Malley, PhD, Mark Rudolph, MD, Julie Bynum, MD, Megan Murphy, MS, Amber E. Barnato, MD, MPH, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fewer than half of the US population has an advance healthcare directive. Hospitalizations offer a key opportunity for clinicians to engage patients in advance care planning (ACP) conversations. Guidelines suggest screening for the presence of “serious illness” but do not further specify how to prioritize the 12.4 million patients hospitalized each year.

Objective

To establish a normative standard for prioritizing hospitalized patients for ACP conversations.

Design and Setting

A modified Delphi study, with three iterative rounds of online surveys.

Participants

Multi-disciplinary group of US-based clinicians with research and practical expertise in ACP.

Main Measures

Indirect and direct elicitation of short-term and 1-year risk of mortality that prompt experts to prioritize ACP conversations for hospitalized adults.

Main results

Fifty-seven of 108 (52%) candidate panelists completed round 1, and 47 completed rounds 2 and 3. Panelists were primarily physicians (84%), with significant experience (mean years 23 [SD 9.8]), who either taught (55%) and/or performed research about ACP (55%). In round 1, > 70% of panelists agreed that all hospitalized adults ≥ 65 years should have an ACP conversation before discharge, but disagreed about the timing and content of the conversation. By round 3, > 70% of participants agreed that patients with either high (> 10%) short-term or high (≥ 34%) 1-year risk of mortality should have a goals of care conversation (i.e., focused on preferences for near-term treatment), while patients with low (≤ 10%) short-term and low (< 19%) 1-year risk of mortality warranted an ACP conversation (i.e., focused on preferences for future care) before discharge.

Limitations

Use of case vignettes to elicit clinician judgment; response rate.

Conclusions

Panelists agreed that clinicians should have an ACP conversation with all hospitalized adults over 65 years in an ACP conversation, adjusting the content and timing of the conversation conditional on the patient’s risk of short-term and 1-year mortality.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine 2015. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine 2015. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
4.
go back to reference Anderson WG, Berlinger N, Ragland J et al. Hospital-based prognosis and goals of care discussions with seriously ill patients: a pathway to integrate a key primary palliative care process into the workflow of hospitalist physicians and their teams. Society of Hospital Medicine and The Hastings Center, 2017. Anderson WG, Berlinger N, Ragland J et al. Hospital-based prognosis and goals of care discussions with seriously ill patients: a pathway to integrate a key primary palliative care process into the workflow of hospitalist physicians and their teams. Society of Hospital Medicine and The Hastings Center, 2017.
5.
go back to reference Howard M, Bernard C, Klein D et al. Barriers to and enablers of advance care planning with patients in primary care. Canadian Family Physician 2018; 64: e190-8.PubMedPubMedCentral Howard M, Bernard C, Klein D et al. Barriers to and enablers of advance care planning with patients in primary care. Canadian Family Physician 2018; 64: e190-8.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Lund S, Richardson A, and May C. Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116629.CrossRef Lund S, Richardson A, and May C. Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116629.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heyland DK, Barwich D, Pichora D et al. Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 778-787.CrossRef Heyland DK, Barwich D, Pichora D et al. Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 778-787.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haydar SA, Almeder L, Michalakes L et al. Using the surprise question to identify those with unmet palliative care needs in emergency and inpatient settings: what do clinicians think? J Palliat Med 2017; 20: 729-735.CrossRef Haydar SA, Almeder L, Michalakes L et al. Using the surprise question to identify those with unmet palliative care needs in emergency and inpatient settings: what do clinicians think? J Palliat Med 2017; 20: 729-735.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R et al. The ‘surprise question’ for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2017; 189: E484-93CrossRef Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R et al. The ‘surprise question’ for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2017; 189: E484-93CrossRef
11.
go back to reference White N, Kupeli N, Vickerstaff V et al. How accurate is the ‘surprise question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine 2017; 15: 139.CrossRef White N, Kupeli N, Vickerstaff V et al. How accurate is the ‘surprise question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine 2017; 15: 139.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011; 6: e20476.CrossRef Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011; 6: e20476.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Avella JR. Delphi Panels: Research design, procedures, advantages and challenges. Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2016;11:305-321.CrossRef Avella JR. Delphi Panels: Research design, procedures, advantages and challenges. Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2016;11:305-321.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of advanced nursing. 2003;41(4):376-382.CrossRef Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of advanced nursing. 2003;41(4):376-382.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology. 1997;17(4):373-386.CrossRef Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology. 1997;17(4):373-386.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 53: 821-832.CrossRef Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 53: 821-832.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nisbett, RE and Wilson, TD. (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev. 84(3): 231-259.CrossRef Nisbett, RE and Wilson, TD. (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev. 84(3): 231-259.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference McDermott KW, Elixhauser A, Sun R. Trends in hospital inpatient stays in the US, 2005-2014. Statistical brief #225. In Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017. McDermott KW, Elixhauser A, Sun R. Trends in hospital inpatient stays in the US, 2005-2014. Statistical brief #225. In Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017.
20.
go back to reference Michtalki HJ, Yeh H, Pronovost PJ et al. Impact of attending physician workload on patient care: a survey of hospitalists. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173: 375-377.CrossRef Michtalki HJ, Yeh H, Pronovost PJ et al. Impact of attending physician workload on patient care: a survey of hospitalists. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173: 375-377.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pelland K, Morphis B, Harris D, Gardner R. Assessment of first-year use of Medicare’s advance care planning billing codes. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2019.179: 827-829.CrossRef Pelland K, Morphis B, Harris D, Gardner R. Assessment of first-year use of Medicare’s advance care planning billing codes. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2019.179: 827-829.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Barnato AE, O'Malley AJ, Skinner JS, Birkmeyer JD. Use of advance care planning billing codes for hospitalized older adults at high risk of dying: a national observational study. Journal of hospital medicine. 2019;14(4):229-231.CrossRef Barnato AE, O'Malley AJ, Skinner JS, Birkmeyer JD. Use of advance care planning billing codes for hospitalized older adults at high risk of dying: a national observational study. Journal of hospital medicine. 2019;14(4):229-231.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dhami MK, Hertwig R, and Hoffrage U. The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 959-988.CrossRef Dhami MK, Hertwig R, and Hoffrage U. The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 959-988.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283:1715-1722.CrossRef Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283:1715-1722.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Halpern SD, Kohn R, Dornbrand-Lo A, Metkus T, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys. Health services research. 2011;46(5):1663-1674.CrossRef Halpern SD, Kohn R, Dornbrand-Lo A, Metkus T, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys. Health services research. 2011;46(5):1663-1674.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, and Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324: 1183-5.CrossRef Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, and Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324: 1183-5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A New Standard for Advance Care Planning (ACP) Conversations in the Hospital: Results from a Delphi Panel
Authors
Deepika Mohan, MD, MPH
Olivia A. Sacks, MD
James O’Malley, PhD
Mark Rudolph, MD
Julie Bynum, MD
Megan Murphy, MS
Amber E. Barnato, MD, MPH, MS
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06150-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.