Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2024

20-12-2023 | Cardiogenic Shock | Goal-Directed Therapy (M Legrand, Section Editor)

Goal-Directed Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: No Magical Recipe

Authors: Mickael Lescroart, Juliette Piccoli, Jean-Louis Hébert, Antoine Kimmoun

Published in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a critical condition associated with a high mortality rate. Early and appropriate management may prevent or reverse multiple organ failure. Various strategies have been proposed to appropriately manage CS, but no goal-directed therapy has yet been validated.

Recent Findings

In this narrative review, we propose a physiological-based goal-directed therapy that relies on both flow and pressure monitoring to adapt the titration of inotropic and vasopressor drugs. Along with addressing the initial trigger, these physiological endpoints should serve as the benchmark for accurately adjusting therapeutics up to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implementation if necessary.

Summary

The ultimate challenge is to define early in the trajectory of patients with cardiogenic shock, whether it is a bridge to recovery or, if eligible, a bridge to heart transplantation or a long-term assistance device.

Graphical Abstract

MAP, mean arterial pressure; RAP, right atrial pressure; RV, right ventricle; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressures; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressures; HTx, heart transplantation; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; LVOT VTI, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral; IVC, inferior vena cava; LVFP, left ventricular filling pressures; CS, cardiogenic shock; CO, cardiac output; PAC, pulmonary artery catheter; PICCO, pulse index continuous cardiac output; CRT, capillary refill time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hunziker L, Radovanovic D, Jeger R, et al. Twenty-year trends in the incidence and outcome of cardiogenic shock in AMIS Plus Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007293.PubMedCrossRef Hunziker L, Radovanovic D, Jeger R, et al. Twenty-year trends in the incidence and outcome of cardiogenic shock in AMIS Plus Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007293.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.PubMedCrossRef Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yu H, Chi D, Wang S, et al. Effect of early goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008330.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yu H, Chi D, Wang S, et al. Effect of early goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008330.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Puymirat E, Fagon JY, Aegerter P, et al. Cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: evolution of prevalence, patient profile, management and outcomes, 1997-2012. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:192–200.PubMedCrossRef Puymirat E, Fagon JY, Aegerter P, et al. Cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: evolution of prevalence, patient profile, management and outcomes, 1997-2012. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:192–200.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vincent J-L, Jones G, David S, et al. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23:196.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vincent J-L, Jones G, David S, et al. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23:196.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference • Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94:29–37. New classification of cardiogenic shock.PubMedCrossRef • Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94:29–37. New classification of cardiogenic shock.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Levy B, Bastien O, Karim B, et al. Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:52.PubMed Levy B, Bastien O, Karim B, et al. Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:52.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, et al. Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2246–56.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, et al. Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2246–56.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Harjola V-P, Lassus J, Sionis A, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:501–9.PubMedCrossRef Harjola V-P, Lassus J, Sionis A, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:501–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Delmas C, Roubille F, Lamblin N, et al. Baseline characteristics, management, and predictors of early mortality in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK registry. ESC Heart Failure. 2022;9:408–19.PubMedCrossRef Delmas C, Roubille F, Lamblin N, et al. Baseline characteristics, management, and predictors of early mortality in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK registry. ESC Heart Failure. 2022;9:408–19.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625–34.PubMedCrossRef Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625–34.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–96.PubMedCrossRef Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–96.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baran DA, Long A, Badiye AP, et al. Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: single center analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:1339–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baran DA, Long A, Badiye AP, et al. Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: single center analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:1339–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bolli R. William Harvey and the discovery of the circulation of the blood. Circ Res. 2019;124:1300–2.PubMedCrossRef Bolli R. William Harvey and the discovery of the circulation of the blood. Circ Res. 2019;124:1300–2.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lewis O. Stephen Hales and the measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:865–71.PubMed Lewis O. Stephen Hales and the measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:865–71.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Meyer JA. Werner Forssmann and catheterization of the heart, 1929. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:497–9.PubMedCrossRef Meyer JA. Werner Forssmann and catheterization of the heart, 1929. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:497–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Guyton AC. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev. 1955;35:123–9.PubMedCrossRef Guyton AC. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev. 1955;35:123–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sunagawa K, Sagawa K, Maughan WL. Ventricular interaction with the loading system. Ann Biomed Eng. 1984;12:163–89.PubMedCrossRef Sunagawa K, Sagawa K, Maughan WL. Ventricular interaction with the loading system. Ann Biomed Eng. 1984;12:163–89.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fick AV. On liquid diffusion. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1855;10:30–9.CrossRef Fick AV. On liquid diffusion. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1855;10:30–9.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Westerhof N, Lankhaar J-W, Westerhof BE. The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:131–41.PubMedCrossRef Westerhof N, Lankhaar J-W, Westerhof BE. The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:131–41.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Bruno RR, Wollborn J, Fengler K, et al. Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:645–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bruno RR, Wollborn J, Fengler K, et al. Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:645–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2017;21:136.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2017;21:136.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Santangelo G, Rossi A, Toriello F, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic valve stenosis: the role of non-invasive imaging. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3745.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Santangelo G, Rossi A, Toriello F, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic valve stenosis: the role of non-invasive imaging. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3745.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Savaş G, Şahin Ö, Yaşan M, et al. Does the volume overload exaggerate the severity of mitral regurgitation in patients with decompensated heart failure? Turk. J Med Sci. 2020;50:1552–8. Savaş G, Şahin Ö, Yaşan M, et al. Does the volume overload exaggerate the severity of mitral regurgitation in patients with decompensated heart failure? Turk. J Med Sci. 2020;50:1552–8.
32.
go back to reference Pellicori P, Carubelli V, Zhang J, et al. IVC diameter in patients with chronic heart failure: relationships and prognostic significance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:16–28.PubMedCrossRef Pellicori P, Carubelli V, Zhang J, et al. IVC diameter in patients with chronic heart failure: relationships and prognostic significance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:16–28.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference David S, Zaks JM. Arrhythmias associated with intermittent outpatient dobutamine infusion. Angiology. 1986;37:86–91.PubMedCrossRef David S, Zaks JM. Arrhythmias associated with intermittent outpatient dobutamine infusion. Angiology. 1986;37:86–91.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Follath F, Cleland JGF, Just H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002;360:196–202.PubMedCrossRef Follath F, Cleland JGF, Just H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002;360:196–202.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mathew R, Di Santo P, Jung RG, et al. Milrinone as compared with dobutamine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:516–25.PubMedCrossRef Mathew R, Di Santo P, Jung RG, et al. Milrinone as compared with dobutamine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:516–25.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e895–1032.PubMed Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e895–1032.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Parlow S, Santo PD, Sterling LH, et al. Inotrope versus placebo therapy in cardiogenic shock: rationale and study design of the CAPITAL DOREMI2 trial. Am Heart J. 2023;262:83–9.PubMedCrossRef Parlow S, Santo PD, Sterling LH, et al. Inotrope versus placebo therapy in cardiogenic shock: rationale and study design of the CAPITAL DOREMI2 trial. Am Heart J. 2023;262:83–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bistola V, Arfaras-Melainis A, Polyzogopoulou E, et al. Inotropes in acute heart failure: from guidelines to practical use: therapeutic options and clinical practice. Card Fail Rev. 2019;5:133–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bistola V, Arfaras-Melainis A, Polyzogopoulou E, et al. Inotropes in acute heart failure: from guidelines to practical use: therapeutic options and clinical practice. Card Fail Rev. 2019;5:133–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Verma S, Fedak PWM, Weisel RD, et al. Fundamentals of reperfusion injury for the clinical cardiologist. Circulation. 2002;105:2332–6.PubMedCrossRef Verma S, Fedak PWM, Weisel RD, et al. Fundamentals of reperfusion injury for the clinical cardiologist. Circulation. 2002;105:2332–6.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference • Levy B, Clere-Jehl R, Legras A, et al. Epinephrine versus norepinephrine for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:173–82. Study comparing inopressors in patients with cardiogenic shock.PubMedCrossRef • Levy B, Clere-Jehl R, Legras A, et al. Epinephrine versus norepinephrine for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:173–82. Study comparing inopressors in patients with cardiogenic shock.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Legrand M, Zarbock A. Ten tips to optimize vasopressors use in the critically ill patient with hypotension. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:736–9.PubMedCrossRef Legrand M, Zarbock A. Ten tips to optimize vasopressors use in the critically ill patient with hypotension. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:736–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference • Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191. New guidelines for the management of ACS. • Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehad191. New guidelines for the management of ACS.
44.
go back to reference Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126.PubMedCrossRef Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3427–520.PubMedCrossRef Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3427–520.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, Berg DD, et al. Management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in cardiac ICUs with versus without shock teams. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1309–17.PubMedCrossRef Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, Berg DD, et al. Management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in cardiac ICUs with versus without shock teams. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1309–17.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:1121–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:1121–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1938–52.PubMedCrossRef Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1938–52.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Masson R, Colas V, Parienti J-J, et al. A comparison of survival with and without extracorporeal life support treatment for severe poisoning due to drug intoxication. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1413–7.PubMedCrossRef Masson R, Colas V, Parienti J-J, et al. A comparison of survival with and without extracorporeal life support treatment for severe poisoning due to drug intoxication. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1413–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Merdji H, Curtiaud A, Aheto A, et al. Performance of early capillary refill time measurement on outcomes in cardiogenic shock: an observational, prospective multicentric study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206:1230–8.PubMedCrossRef Merdji H, Curtiaud A, Aheto A, et al. Performance of early capillary refill time measurement on outcomes in cardiogenic shock: an observational, prospective multicentric study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206:1230–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Schupp T, Rusnak J, Weidner K, et al. Prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio versus bilirubin in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Clin Med. 2023;12:5275.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schupp T, Rusnak J, Weidner K, et al. Prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio versus bilirubin in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Clin Med. 2023;12:5275.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Fuernau G, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S, et al. Arterial lactate in cardiogenic shock: prognostic value of clearance versus single values. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2208–16.PubMedCrossRef Fuernau G, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S, et al. Arterial lactate in cardiogenic shock: prognostic value of clearance versus single values. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2208–16.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Stone S, Schwartz B, Marbach J, et al. Lactate clearance predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:S20–1.CrossRef Stone S, Schwartz B, Marbach J, et al. Lactate clearance predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:S20–1.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Swan HJC, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447–51.PubMedCrossRef Swan HJC, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447–51.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1625–33.PubMedCrossRef Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1625–33.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Sionis A, Rivas-Lasarte M, Mebazaa A, et al. Current use and impact on 30-day mortality of pulmonary artery catheter in cardiogenic shock patients: results from the CardShock Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:1426–33.PubMedCrossRef Sionis A, Rivas-Lasarte M, Mebazaa A, et al. Current use and impact on 30-day mortality of pulmonary artery catheter in cardiogenic shock patients: results from the CardShock Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:1426–33.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Kubiak GM, Ciarka A, Biniecka M, et al. Right heart catheterization—background, physiological basics, and clinical implications. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1331.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kubiak GM, Ciarka A, Biniecka M, et al. Right heart catheterization—background, physiological basics, and clinical implications. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1331.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Bertaina M, Galluzzo A, Morici N, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in patients with cardiogenic shock: time for a reappraisal? Card Fail Rev. 2022;8:e15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bertaina M, Galluzzo A, Morici N, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in patients with cardiogenic shock: time for a reappraisal? Card Fail Rev. 2022;8:e15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Chastre J, Cornud F, Bouchama A, et al. Thrombosis as a complication of pulmonary-artery catheterization via the internal jugular vein: prospective evaluation by phlebography. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:278–81.PubMedCrossRef Chastre J, Cornud F, Bouchama A, et al. Thrombosis as a complication of pulmonary-artery catheterization via the internal jugular vein: prospective evaluation by phlebography. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:278–81.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Kadosh BS, Berg DD, Bohula EA, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter use and mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. JACC. Heart Failure. 2023;11:903–14.PubMed Kadosh BS, Berg DD, Bohula EA, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter use and mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. JACC. Heart Failure. 2023;11:903–14.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Perel A, Saugel B, Teboul J-L, et al. The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:511–8.PubMedCrossRef Perel A, Saugel B, Teboul J-L, et al. The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:511–8.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Zhang Y-B, Zhang Z-Z, Li J-X, et al. Application of pulse index continuous cardiac output system in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a prospective randomized study. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7:1291–301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang Y-B, Zhang Z-Z, Li J-X, et al. Application of pulse index continuous cardiac output system in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a prospective randomized study. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7:1291–301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Perny J, Kimmoun A, Perez P, et al. Evaluation of cardiac function index as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution as an indicator of left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiogenic shock. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:598029.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Perny J, Kimmoun A, Perez P, et al. Evaluation of cardiac function index as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution as an indicator of left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiogenic shock. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:598029.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Broch O, Renner J, Höcker J, et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15:R76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Broch O, Renner J, Höcker J, et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15:R76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:615–22.PubMedCrossRef Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:615–22.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480–6. table of contentsPubMedCrossRef Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480–6. table of contentsPubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Gallet R, Lellouche N, Mitchell-Heggs L, et al. Prognosis value of central venous oxygen saturation in acute decompensated heart failure. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;105:5–12.PubMedCrossRef Gallet R, Lellouche N, Mitchell-Heggs L, et al. Prognosis value of central venous oxygen saturation in acute decompensated heart failure. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;105:5–12.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Giraud R, Vujovic B, Assouline B, et al. Do ScvO2 variations induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness? A prospective study. Physiol Rep. 2021;9:e15012.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giraud R, Vujovic B, Assouline B, et al. Do ScvO2 variations induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness? A prospective study. Physiol Rep. 2021;9:e15012.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Gutierrez G. A mathematical model of tissue-blood carbon dioxide exchange during hypoxia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:525–33.PubMedCrossRef Gutierrez G. A mathematical model of tissue-blood carbon dioxide exchange during hypoxia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:525–33.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Marik PE. Regional carbon dioxide monitoring to assess the adequacy of tissue perfusion. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:245–51.PubMedCrossRef Marik PE. Regional carbon dioxide monitoring to assess the adequacy of tissue perfusion. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:245–51.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Dubin A, Estenssoro E. Mechanisms of tissue hypercarbia in sepsis. Front Biosci. 2008;13:1340–51.PubMedCrossRef Dubin A, Estenssoro E. Mechanisms of tissue hypercarbia in sepsis. Front Biosci. 2008;13:1340–51.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Mekontso-Dessap A, Castelain V, Anguel N, et al. Combination of venoarterial PCO2 difference with arteriovenous O2 content difference to detect anaerobic metabolism in patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:272–7.PubMedCrossRef Mekontso-Dessap A, Castelain V, Anguel N, et al. Combination of venoarterial PCO2 difference with arteriovenous O2 content difference to detect anaerobic metabolism in patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:272–7.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Jakob SM, Groeneveld ABJ, Teboul J-L. Venous-arterial CO2 to arterial-venous O2 difference ratio as a resuscitation target in shock states? Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:936–8.PubMedCrossRef Jakob SM, Groeneveld ABJ, Teboul J-L. Venous-arterial CO2 to arterial-venous O2 difference ratio as a resuscitation target in shock states? Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:936–8.PubMedCrossRef
77.
79.
go back to reference Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Burkhoff D, et al. Central venous pressure and clinical outcomes during left-sided mechanical support for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020:7–155. Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Burkhoff D, et al. Central venous pressure and clinical outcomes during left-sided mechanical support for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020:7–155.
80.
go back to reference Weil BR, Konecny F, Suzuki G, et al. Comparative hemodynamic effects of contemporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:2292–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Weil BR, Konecny F, Suzuki G, et al. Comparative hemodynamic effects of contemporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:2292–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Josiassen J, Helgestad OKL, Udesen NLJ, et al. Unloading using Impella CP during profound cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure in a large animal model: impact on the right ventricle. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020;8:41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Josiassen J, Helgestad OKL, Udesen NLJ, et al. Unloading using Impella CP during profound cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure in a large animal model: impact on the right ventricle. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020;8:41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Lee MS, Makkar RR. Percutaneous left ventricular support devices. Cardiol Clin. 2006;24:265–75. viiPubMedCrossRef Lee MS, Makkar RR. Percutaneous left ventricular support devices. Cardiol Clin. 2006;24:265–75. viiPubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Parlow S, Di Santo P, Mathew R, et al. The association between mean arterial pressure and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock: insights from the DOREMI trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021;10:712–20.PubMedCrossRef Parlow S, Di Santo P, Mathew R, et al. The association between mean arterial pressure and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock: insights from the DOREMI trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021;10:712–20.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Perez P, Kimmoun A, Blime V, et al. Increasing mean arterial pressure in cardiogenic shock secondary to myocardial infarction: effects on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation. Shock. 2014;41:269–74.PubMedCrossRef Perez P, Kimmoun A, Blime V, et al. Increasing mean arterial pressure in cardiogenic shock secondary to myocardial infarction: effects on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation. Shock. 2014;41:269–74.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Ameloot K, Jakkula P, Hästbacka J, et al. Optimum blood pressure in patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:812–24.PubMedCrossRef Ameloot K, Jakkula P, Hästbacka J, et al. Optimum blood pressure in patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:812–24.PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Burstein B, Tabi M, Barsness GW, et al. Association between mean arterial pressure during the first 24 hours and hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Crit Care. 2020;24:513.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Burstein B, Tabi M, Barsness GW, et al. Association between mean arterial pressure during the first 24 hours and hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Crit Care. 2020;24:513.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Thayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, et al. Invasive hemodynamic assessment and classification of in-hospital mortality risk among patients with cardiogenic shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13:e007099.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Thayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, et al. Invasive hemodynamic assessment and classification of in-hospital mortality risk among patients with cardiogenic shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13:e007099.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Goal-Directed Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: No Magical Recipe
Authors
Mickael Lescroart
Juliette Piccoli
Jean-Louis Hébert
Antoine Kimmoun
Publication date
20-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Anesthesiology Reports / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00595-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2024 Go to the issue

Anesthesia, Pain Management and Long-term Outcomes (VNR Gottumukkala and ER Mariano, Section Editors)

Anesthetic Exposure During Early Childhood and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: Our Current Understanding

Neuromuscular Blockade (CA Lien, Section Editor)

Monitoring the Depth of Neuromuscular Blockade

Ambulatory Anesthesia (G Joshi, Section Editor)

Nonoperating Room Anesthesia: What Is New? What Is Controversial?