Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 07-05-2024 | Cardiogenic Shock | Original Article

ECPELLA as a bridge-to-decision in refractory cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience

Authors: Jan-Willem Balder, Mariusz K. Szymanski, Linda W. van Laake, Pim van der Harst, Christiaan L. Meuwese, Faiz Z. Ramjankhan, Manon G. van der Meer, Jeannine A. J. M. Hermens, Michiel Voskuil, Eric E. C. de Waal, Dirk W. Donker, Marish I. F. J. Oerlemans, Adriaan O. Kraaijeveld

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In refractory cardiogenic shock, temporary mechanical support (tMCS) may be crucial for maintaining tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. tMCS can serve as a bridge-to-decision to assess eligibility for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or heart transplantation, or as a bridge-to-recovery. ECPELLA is a novel tMCS configuration combining venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with Impella. The present study presents the clinical parameters, outcomes, and complications of patients supported with ECPELLA.

Methods

All patients supported with ECPELLA at University Medical Centre Utrecht between December 2020 and August 2023 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were LVAD implantation/heart transplantation and safety outcomes.

Results

Twenty patients with an average age of 51 years, and of whom 70% were males, were included. Causes of cardiogenic shock were acute heart failure (due to acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, or after cardiac surgery) or chronic heart failure, respectively 70 and 30% of cases. The median duration of ECPELLA support was 164 h (interquartile range 98–210). In 50% of cases, a permanent LVAD was implanted. Cardiac recovery within 30 days was seen in 30% of cases and 30-day mortality rate was 20%. ECPELLA support was associated with major bleeding (40%), haemolysis (25%), vascular complications (30%), kidney failure requiring replacement therapy (50%), and Impella failure requiring extraction (15%).

Conclusion

ECPELLA can be successfully used as a bridge to LVAD implantation or as a bridge-to-recovery in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Despite a significant number of complications, 30-day mortality was lower than observed in previous cohorts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Topalian S, Ginsberg F, Parrillo JE. Cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:66–74.CrossRef Topalian S, Ginsberg F, Parrillo JE. Cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:66–74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Belohlavek J, Hunziker P, Donker DW. Left ventricular unloading and the role of ECpella. Eur Heart J. 2021;23:27–34.CrossRef Belohlavek J, Hunziker P, Donker DW. Left ventricular unloading and the role of ECpella. Eur Heart J. 2021;23:27–34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ezad SM, Ryan M, Donker DW, et al. Unloading the left ventricle in venoarterial ECMO: In whom, when, and how? Circulation. 2023;147:1237–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ezad SM, Ryan M, Donker DW, et al. Unloading the left ventricle in venoarterial ECMO: In whom, when, and how? Circulation. 2023;147:1237–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Petroni T, Harrois A, Amour J, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump effects on macrocirculation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2075–82.CrossRefPubMed Petroni T, Harrois A, Amour J, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump effects on macrocirculation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2075–82.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ. Beat-to-beat augmentation of left ventricular function by intraaortic counterpulsation. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:545–54.CrossRefPubMed Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ. Beat-to-beat augmentation of left ventricular function by intraaortic counterpulsation. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:545–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Meani P, Lorusso R, ECPella PF. Concept, physiology and clinical applications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36:557–66.CrossRefPubMed Meani P, Lorusso R, ECPella PF. Concept, physiology and clinical applications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36:557–66.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Iannaccone M, Venuti G, di Simone E, et al. Comparison of ECMO vs ECpella in patients with non-post-pericardiotomy cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022;40:134–41.CrossRefPubMed Iannaccone M, Venuti G, di Simone E, et al. Comparison of ECMO vs ECpella in patients with non-post-pericardiotomy cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022;40:134–41.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schrage B, Becher PM, Bernhardt A, et al. Left ventricular unloading is associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Results from an international, multicenter cohort study. Circulation. 2020;142:2095–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schrage B, Becher PM, Bernhardt A, et al. Left ventricular unloading is associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Results from an international, multicenter cohort study. Circulation. 2020;142:2095–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Felix SEA, Ramjankhan FZ, Buijsrogge MP, et al. Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2020;28:210–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Felix SEA, Ramjankhan FZ, Buijsrogge MP, et al. Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2020;28:210–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Sammani A, Wind AM, Kirkels JH, et al. Thirty years of heart transplantation at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:516–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sammani A, Wind AM, Kirkels JH, et al. Thirty years of heart transplantation at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:516–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Meuwese CL, Hermens JA, de Haan M, et al. Twelve years of circulatory extracorporeal life support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2021;29:394–401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meuwese CL, Hermens JA, de Haan M, et al. Twelve years of circulatory extracorporeal life support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Neth Heart J. 2021;29:394–401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update: A review and incorporation of validation studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:933–46.CrossRefPubMed Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update: A review and incorporation of validation studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:933–46.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schrage B, Sundermeyer J, Blankenberg S, et al. Timing of active left ventricular unloading in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. JACC Heart Fail. 2023;11:321–30.CrossRefPubMed Schrage B, Sundermeyer J, Blankenberg S, et al. Timing of active left ventricular unloading in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. JACC Heart Fail. 2023;11:321–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Akanni OJ, Takeda K, Truby LK, et al. EC-VAD: combined use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial pump left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2019;65:219–26.CrossRefPubMed Akanni OJ, Takeda K, Truby LK, et al. EC-VAD: combined use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial pump left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2019;65:219–26.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shibasaki I, Masawa T, Abe S, et al. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock. J Cardiol. 2022;80:116–24.CrossRefPubMed Shibasaki I, Masawa T, Abe S, et al. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock. J Cardiol. 2022;80:116–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mehra MR, Nayak A, Morris AA, et al. Prediction of survival after implantation of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device. JACC Heart Fail. 2022;10:948–59.CrossRefPubMed Mehra MR, Nayak A, Morris AA, et al. Prediction of survival after implantation of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device. JACC Heart Fail. 2022;10:948–59.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Numan L, Ramjankhan FZ, Oberski DL, et al. Propensity score-based analysis of long-term outcome of patients on HeartWare and HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device support. Esc Heart Fail. 2021;8:1596–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Numan L, Ramjankhan FZ, Oberski DL, et al. Propensity score-based analysis of long-term outcome of patients on HeartWare and HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device support. Esc Heart Fail. 2021;8:1596–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Unoki T, Kamentani M, Nakayama T, et al. Impact of extracorporeal CPR with transcatheter heart pump support (ECPELLA) on improvement of short-term survival and neurological outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest—A single-site retrospective cohort study. Resusc. Plus. 2022;10:100244. Unoki T, Kamentani M, Nakayama T, et al. Impact of extracorporeal CPR with transcatheter heart pump support (ECPELLA) on improvement of short-term survival and neurological outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest—A single-site retrospective cohort study. Resusc. Plus. 2022;10:100244.
19.
go back to reference Patel SM, Lipinski J, Al-Kindi SG, et al. Simultaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous left ventricular decompression therapy with Impella is associated with improved outcomes in refractory cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2019;65:21–8.CrossRefPubMed Patel SM, Lipinski J, Al-Kindi SG, et al. Simultaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous left ventricular decompression therapy with Impella is associated with improved outcomes in refractory cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2019;65:21–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bhatia K, Jain V, Hendrickson MJ, et al. Meta-analysis comparing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with or without Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2022;181:94–101.CrossRefPubMed Bhatia K, Jain V, Hendrickson MJ, et al. Meta-analysis comparing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with or without Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2022;181:94–101.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I, et al. Extracorporeal life support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1286–97.CrossRefPubMed Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I, et al. Extracorporeal life support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1286–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
ECPELLA as a bridge-to-decision in refractory cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience
Authors
Jan-Willem Balder
Mariusz K. Szymanski
Linda W. van Laake
Pim van der Harst
Christiaan L. Meuwese
Faiz Z. Ramjankhan
Manon G. van der Meer
Jeannine A. J. M. Hermens
Michiel Voskuil
Eric E. C. de Waal
Dirk W. Donker
Marish I. F. J. Oerlemans
Adriaan O. Kraaijeveld
Publication date
07-05-2024