Skip to main content
Top

17-04-2024 | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Effect of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with pacemaker dependency

Authors: Toshihiro Nakamura, Kohei Ishibashi, Nobuhiko Ueda, Satoshi Oka, Yuichiro Miyazaki, Akinori Wakamiya, Kenzaburo Nakajima, Tsukasa Kamakura, Mitsuru Wada, Yuko Inoue, Koji Miyamoto, Satoshi Nagase, Takeshi Aiba, Kengo Kusano

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm allows continuous adjustments of pacing timings of atrioventricular delays by periodic automatic evaluation of electrical conduction. This applies to patients with an atrioventricular block and is effective in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices; however, whether this algorithm benefits patients with pacemaker dependency is uncertain.

Methods

This study examined the clinical impact of an aCRT algorithm in patients diagnosed with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and pacemaker dependency. A total of 359 patients underwent CRT between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients undergoing pacemaker-dependent CRT with the aCRT algorithm function were selected. Sixty-four patients with pacemaker dependency (31 with aCRT algorithm and 33 without) were included. Pacemaker dependency was defined as the absence of spontaneous ventricular activity during the sensing test at VVI 30 bpm or prolonged atrioventricular delay (> 300 ms). The primary endpoint was the composite clinical outcome of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure.

Results

No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between groups. During a median follow-up of 1,067 days (interquartile range 553–1,776 days), aCRT reduced the risk of composite clinical outcomes in patients with pacemaker dependency (log-rank P = 0.028). In addition, using the aCRT algorithm was an independent predictor of the composite clinical outcomes in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.94, P = 0.038).

Conclusion

The aCRT algorithm significantly reduced the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pacemaker dependency. This algorithm may be an important tool for managing such patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nogami A, Kurita T, Abe H, et al. Corrigendum: JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias. Circ J. 2021;85:1692–700.CrossRefPubMed Nogami A, Kurita T, Abe H, et al. Corrigendum: JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias. Circ J. 2021;85:1692–700.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, et al. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1585–93.CrossRefPubMed Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, et al. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1585–93.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Krum H, Lemke B, Birnie D, et al. A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: Rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial. Am Heart J. 2012;163:747–752e1.CrossRefPubMed Krum H, Lemke B, Birnie D, et al. A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: Rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial. Am Heart J. 2012;163:747–752e1.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chatterjee NA, Gold MR, Waggoner AD, et al. Longer left ventricular electric delay reduces mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: mechanistic insights from the SMART-AV study (SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e004346.CrossRefPubMed Chatterjee NA, Gold MR, Waggoner AD, et al. Longer left ventricular electric delay reduces mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: mechanistic insights from the SMART-AV study (SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e004346.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Singh JP, Cha YM, Lunati M, et al. Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:825–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh JP, Cha YM, Lunati M, et al. Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:825–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Yagishita D, Shoda M, Yagishita Y, Ejima K, Hagiwara N. Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a novel predictor of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:395–402.CrossRefPubMed Yagishita D, Shoda M, Yagishita Y, Ejima K, Hagiwara N. Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a novel predictor of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:395–402.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yagishita D, Yagishita Y, Kataoka S, et al. Left ventricular stimulation with electrical latency predicts mortality in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:796–805.CrossRefPubMed Yagishita D, Yagishita Y, Kataoka S, et al. Left ventricular stimulation with electrical latency predicts mortality in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:796–805.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Khaykin Y, Exner D, Birnie D, Sapp J, Aggarwal S, Sambelashvili A. Adjusting the timing of left-ventricular pacing using electrocardiogram and device electrograms. Europace. 2011;13:1464–70.CrossRefPubMed Khaykin Y, Exner D, Birnie D, Sapp J, Aggarwal S, Sambelashvili A. Adjusting the timing of left-ventricular pacing using electrocardiogram and device electrograms. Europace. 2011;13:1464–70.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A, Pijls NH. The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2305–10.CrossRefPubMed van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A, Pijls NH. The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2305–10.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jones RC, Svinarich T, Rubin A, et al. Optimal atrioventricular delay in CRT patients can be approximated using surface electrocardiography and device electrograms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1226–32.CrossRefPubMed Jones RC, Svinarich T, Rubin A, et al. Optimal atrioventricular delay in CRT patients can be approximated using surface electrocardiography and device electrograms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1226–32.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gorcsan J 3rd, Abraham T, Agler DA, et al. Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting–A report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:191–213.CrossRefPubMed Gorcsan J 3rd, Abraham T, Agler DA, et al. Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting–A report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:191–213.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Filippatos G, Birnie D, Gold MR, et al. Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:950–7.CrossRefPubMed Filippatos G, Birnie D, Gold MR, et al. Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:950–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.CrossRefPubMed Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, et al. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure study group. The guidant congestive heart failure research group. Circulation. 1999;99:2993–3001.CrossRefPubMed Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, et al. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure study group. The guidant congestive heart failure research group. Circulation. 1999;99:2993–3001.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Scharf C, Li P, Muntwyler J, et al. Rate-dependent AV delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:279–84.CrossRefPubMed Scharf C, Li P, Muntwyler J, et al. Rate-dependent AV delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:279–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ueda N, Noda T, Ishibashi K, et al. Efficacy of a device-based continuous optimization algorithm for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J. 2019;84:18–25.CrossRefPubMed Ueda N, Noda T, Ishibashi K, et al. Efficacy of a device-based continuous optimization algorithm for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J. 2019;84:18–25.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Martin DO, Lemke B, Birnie D, et al. Investigation of a novel algorithm for synchronized left-ventricular pacing and ambulatory optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the adaptive CRT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1807–14.CrossRefPubMed Martin DO, Lemke B, Birnie D, et al. Investigation of a novel algorithm for synchronized left-ventricular pacing and ambulatory optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the adaptive CRT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1807–14.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Birnie D, Lemke B, Aonuma K, et al. Clinical outcomes with synchronized left ventricular pacing: analysis of the adaptive CRT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1368–74.CrossRefPubMed Birnie D, Lemke B, Aonuma K, et al. Clinical outcomes with synchronized left ventricular pacing: analysis of the adaptive CRT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1368–74.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Birnie D, Hudnall H, Lemke B, et al. Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: results of the adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1820–5.CrossRefPubMed Birnie D, Hudnall H, Lemke B, et al. Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: results of the adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1820–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20:e17–91. S1547-5271(23)02026-X.CrossRefPubMed Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20:e17–91. S1547-5271(23)02026-X.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Shanmugam N, Prada-Delgado O, Campos AG, et al. Rate-adaptive AV delay and exercise performance following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1815–21.CrossRefPubMed Shanmugam N, Prada-Delgado O, Campos AG, et al. Rate-adaptive AV delay and exercise performance following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1815–21.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sun JP, Lee AP, Grimm RA, et al. Optimisation of atrioventricular delay during exercise improves cardiac output in patients stabilised with cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart. 2012;98:54–9.CrossRefPubMed Sun JP, Lee AP, Grimm RA, et al. Optimisation of atrioventricular delay during exercise improves cardiac output in patients stabilised with cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart. 2012;98:54–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kasagawa A, Nakajima I, Izumo M, et al. Novel device-based algorithm provides optimal hemodynamics during exercise in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J. 2019;83:2002–9.CrossRefPubMed Kasagawa A, Nakajima I, Izumo M, et al. Novel device-based algorithm provides optimal hemodynamics during exercise in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J. 2019;83:2002–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with pacemaker dependency
Authors
Toshihiro Nakamura
Kohei Ishibashi
Nobuhiko Ueda
Satoshi Oka
Yuichiro Miyazaki
Akinori Wakamiya
Kenzaburo Nakajima
Tsukasa Kamakura
Mitsuru Wada
Yuko Inoue
Koji Miyamoto
Satoshi Nagase
Takeshi Aiba
Kengo Kusano
Publication date
17-04-2024