Top

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Published in:

01-04-2015 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Can we use intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement as a clue for proper femoral tunnel placement on coronal plane during ACL reconstruction?

Authors: Mustafa Celiktas, Ozkan Kose, Yaman Sarpel, Mahir Gulsen

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 4/2015

Abstract

Introduction

Successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is dependent on correct placement of both tibial and femoral tunnels. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether we can use intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement to estimate the correct femoral tunnel placement on coronal plane.

Methods

This prospective study comprised 164 consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Transtibial or anteromedial portal technique is used for drilling the femoral tunnels. The length of the femoral tunnel was measured during the operation. The femoral tunnel coronal plane angle was calculated on the postoperative tunnel radiographs. A statistical comparison was made of the lengths of the tunnel, the techniques used drilling and the femoral tunnel angles.

Results

The far anteromedial portal was used in 81 (49 %) cases and the transtibial technique in 83 (51 %) cases. The mean femoral tunnel length was 42 ± 6.4 mm and the mean femoral tunnel coronal angle was 41.1° ± 11.6. The tunnel angle in the transtibial technique was determined as significantly low compared to the far anteromedial portal technique (32.6°:49.8°) and the tunnel length was significantly longer (45.8:38.1 mm) (p < 0.001). In the statistical analysis, it was found that a patient with a tunnel length of 41 mm and above had a 92.1 % likelihood of femoral tunnel angle below 45°.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel length can be used as a clue for intraoperative evaluation of the femoral tunnel position. If the femoral tunnel length is greater than 41 mm, the coronal plane orientation of the femoral tunnel will be improper and not at a desired position.

Hefzy MS, Grood ES, Noyes FR (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:208–216CrossRefPubMed

Klos TV, Harman MK, Habets RJ, Devilee RJ, Banks SA (2000) Locating femoral graft placement from lateral radiographs in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 3 methods of measuring radiographic images. Arthroscopy 16:499–504CrossRefPubMed

Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Van Scyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33:712–718CrossRefPubMed

Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter DM, Oakes DA, Zoric B, Gause P, Finerman GA (2002) Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res 20:1016–1024CrossRefPubMed

Rupp S, Muller B, Seil R (2001) Knee laxity after ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:72–76CrossRefPubMed

Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ III (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26(3):342–350CrossRefPubMed

Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(7):771–778CrossRefPubMed

Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19(3):297–304CrossRefPubMed

Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):220–227CrossRefPubMed

10.

Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2008) Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:459–464CrossRefPubMed

11.

Golish SR, Baumfeld JA, Schoderbek RJ, Miller MD (2007) The effect of femoral tunnel starting position on tunnel length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 23:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed

12.

Azzam MG, Lenarz CJ, Farrow LD, Israel H, Kieffer D, Kaar SG (2011) Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the clock face representation as used to describe the femoral intercondylar notch. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1265–1270CrossRefPubMed

13.

Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA (2008) Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 36:176–189CrossRefPubMed

14.

Hohmann E, Bryant A, Tetsworth K (2010) Tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how long is the learning curve? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1576–1582CrossRefPubMed

15.

Yamazaki J, Muneta T, Koga H, Sekiya I, Ju Y-J, Morito T et al (2011) Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:418–423CrossRefPubMed

16.

Howell SM, Taylor MA (1993) Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(7):1044–1055PubMed

17.

Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2001) A comparative study of ‘isometric’ points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(1):28–33CrossRefPubMed

18.

Jepsen CF, Lundberg-Jensen AK, Faunoe P (2007) Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arthroscopy 23:1326–1333CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rue JP, Ghodadra N, Lewis PB, Bach BR Jr (2008) Femoral and tibial tunnel position using a transtibial drilled anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. J Knee Surg 21:246–249CrossRefPubMed

20.

van Eck CF, Martins CA, Vyas SM, Celentano U, van Dijk CN, Fu FH (2010) Femoral intercondylar notch shape and dimensions in ACL-injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1257–1262CrossRefPubMed

21.

Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ (2010) Descriptive epidemiology of the multicenter ACL revision study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 38(10):1979–1986CrossRefPubMed

22.

Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT III (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20(3):294–299CrossRefPubMed

23.

Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bill AMJ, Amis AA (2006) Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):250–256CrossRefPubMed

24.

Lopez-Vidriero E, Johnson D (2009) Evolving concepts in tunnel placement. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 17:210–216CrossRef

25.

Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101CrossRefPubMed

26.

Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB (1996) The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24:335–341CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lintner DM, Dewitt SE, Moseley JB (1996) Radiographic evaluation of native anterior cruciate ligament attachments and graft placement for reconstruction. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 24:72–78CrossRefPubMed

28.

Sommer C, Friederich NF, Muller W (2000) Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:207–213CrossRefPubMed

29.

Giron F, Buzzi R, Aglietti P (1999) Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 15:750–756CrossRefPubMed

Title: Can we use intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement as a clue for proper femoral tunnel placement on coronal plane during ACL reconstruction?
Authors: Mustafa Celiktas
Ozkan Kose
Yaman Sarpel
Mahir Gulsen
Publication date: 01-04-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2173-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Can we use intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement as a clue for proper femoral tunnel placement on coronal plane during ACL reconstruction?

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Single dose intravenous tranexamic acid as effective as continuous infusion in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomised clinical trial

The beneficial effect of Batroxobin on blood loss reduction in spinal fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Thumb fingertip reconstruction with palmar V–Y flaps combined with bone and nail bed grafts following amputation

Survey on the management of acute first-time anterior shoulder dislocation amongst Dutch public hospitals

The effect of antegrade femoral nailing on femoral head perfusion: a comparison of piriformis fossa and trochanteric entry points

Effects of anesthetic technique on blood loss and complications after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty