Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Gastroenterology Reports
Published in: Current Gastroenterology Reports 7/2016

01-07-2016 | GI Oncology (R Bresalier, Section Editor)

Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?

Authors: Selvi Thirumurthi, William A. Ross, Gottumukkala S. Raju

Published in: Current Gastroenterology Reports | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

In order for screening colonoscopy to be an effective tool in reducing colon cancer incidence, exams must be performed in a high-quality manner. Quality metrics have been presented by gastroenterology societies and now include higher adenoma detection rate targets than in the past. In many cases, the quality of colonoscopy can often be improved with simple low-cost interventions such as improved procedure technique, implementing split-dose bowel prep, and monitoring individuals’ performances. Emerging technology has expanded our field of view and image quality during colonoscopy. We will critically review several technological advances in the context of quality metrics and discuss if technology can really improve the quality of colonoscopy.
Literature
1.•
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–306. This work helped strengthen the correlation between ADR and risk of colon cancer.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–803.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1091–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bretagne JF, Hamonic S, Piette C, et al. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:335–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:856–61.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Ross WA, Thirumurthi S, Lynch PM, et al. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:567–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.•
Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53. ASGE task force publication outlining the quality metrics for screening colonoscopy.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Powell N, Hayee BH, Yeoh DP, et al. Terminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope? Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:320–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A, et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:166–71.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, et al. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Endoscopy. 2013;45:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:768–76.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:593–602.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Pellise M, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Cardenas A, et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1062–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K, et al. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:e260–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, et al. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:155–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R, et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:109–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z, et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:353–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Hassan C, Gralnek IM. Cost-effectiveness of “full spectrum endoscopy” colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:390–4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Waye JD, Heigh RI, Fleischer DE, et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:551–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A, et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:480–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, et al. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:542–50.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Rubin M, Lurie L, Bose K, et al. Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10683–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61:1426–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.•
Pohl H, Bensen SP, Toor A, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015;47:891–7. Reference supporting the use of the distal cap attachment in improving ADR.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61:402–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy—a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A, et al. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2015.
30.
Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, et al. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:413–8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Khiani VS, Soulos P, Gancayco J, et al. Anesthesiologist involvement in screening colonoscopy: temporal trends and cost implications in the medicare population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:58–64. e1.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Wernli KJ, Brenner AT, Rutter CM, et al. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2015.
33.•
Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:625–32. Endoscopists performing colonoscopy & polypectomy should be familiar with the NICE classification system.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I, et al. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1301–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.•
Brown SR, Baraza W. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD006439. Chromoendoscopy can improve ADR
36.
Leung JW, Ransibrahmanakul K, Toomsen L, et al. The water method combined with chromoendoscopy enhances adenoma detection. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:53–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Dinesen L, Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ. Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:604–11.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Nagorni A, Bjelakovic G, Petrovic B. Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;1:CD008361.
39.
Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:363–70. quiz 371.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Cadoni S, Gallittu P, Sanna S, et al. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2014;46:212–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Hafner S, Zolk K, Radaelli F, et al. Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD009863.PubMed
42.
Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:944–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Sioulas AD, et al. Diagnostic yield of scope retroflexion in the right colon: a prospective cohort study. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:176–81.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Chandran S, Parker F, Vaughan R, et al. Right-sided adenoma detection with retroflexion versus forward-view colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:608–13.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:415–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.•
Clark BT, Parikh ND, Laine L. Yield of repeat forward-view examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016. Jan 6 Epub ahead of print. PMID:26769408. A repeat second forward look can improve ADR
47.
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:225–32.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–56.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Lee SW, Chang JH, Ji JS, et al. Effect of dynamic position changes on adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:63–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?
Authors
Selvi Thirumurthi
William A. Ross
Gottumukkala S. Raju
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1522-8037
Electronic ISSN: 1534-312X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-016-0505-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Current Gastroenterology Reports 7/2016 Go to the issue

Small Intestine (D Sachar, Section Editor)

Immunogenetic Pathogenesis of Celiac Disease and Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity

Large Intestine (B Cash, Section Editor)

Recent Advances in Diverticular Disease

Stomach and Duodenum (J Pisegna, Section Editor)

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (S Hanauer, Section Editor)

Practical Approaches to “Top–Down” Therapies for Crohn’s Disease

Small Intestine (D Sachar, Section Editor)

Small Bowel Imaging: an Update

Small Intestine (D Sachar, Section Editor)

Management and Complications of Short Bowel Syndrome: an Updated Review
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits