Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review Article

Mechanical support for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting

Authors: Jason M. Ali, Yasir Abu-Omar

Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Special Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support devices are being used to an increasing extent. The use of these devices as an adjunct to cardiac surgery to support ventricular function has contributed to improved outcomes for the highest risk patients. In the context of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, there are several potential indications for mechanical circulatory support: preoperatively in the setting of acute cardiogenic shock, or in patients with intractable angina with or without haemodynamic compromise; at induction of anaesthesia prophylactically in patients with critical coronary anatomy and/or severely impaired left ventricular function; intraoperatively in the setting of failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass; or postoperatively in patients who develop an intractable low cardiac output state. The use of the intra-aortic balloon pump, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart, Impella and central ventricular assist devices will be considered in the setting of high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1407–15.CrossRefPubMed Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1407–15.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:517–92.CrossRefPubMed Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:517–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Velazquez EJ, Williams JB, Yow E, et al. Long-term survival of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy treated by coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:523–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Velazquez EJ, Williams JB, Yow E, et al. Long-term survival of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy treated by coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:523–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Katz JN, Stebbins AL, Alexander JH, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery. Am Heart J. 2009;158:680–7.CrossRefPubMed Katz JN, Stebbins AL, Alexander JH, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery. Am Heart J. 2009;158:680–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625–34.CrossRefPubMed Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nagendran J, Norris CM, Graham MM, et al. Coronary revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:2038–44.CrossRef Nagendran J, Norris CM, Graham MM, et al. Coronary revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:2038–44.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Darwazah AK, Abu Sham'a RA, Hussein E, Hawari MH, Ismail H. Myocardial revascularization in patients with low ejection fraction < or =35%: effect of pump technique on early morbidity and mortality. J Card Surg. 2006;21:22–7.CrossRefPubMed Darwazah AK, Abu Sham'a RA, Hussein E, Hawari MH, Ismail H. Myocardial revascularization in patients with low ejection fraction < or =35%: effect of pump technique on early morbidity and mortality. J Card Surg. 2006;21:22–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Acharya D, Gulack BC, Loyaga-Rendon RY, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:558–66.CrossRefPubMed Acharya D, Gulack BC, Loyaga-Rendon RY, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:558–66.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:156–67.CrossRefPubMed Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:156–67.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, Phillips SJ, Butner AN, Sherman JL Jr. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 1968;203:113–8.CrossRefPubMed Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, Phillips SJ, Butner AN, Sherman JL Jr. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 1968;203:113–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference van Nunen LX, Noc M, Kapur NK, Patel MR, Perera D, Pijls NH. Usefulness of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:469–76.CrossRefPubMed van Nunen LX, Noc M, Kapur NK, Patel MR, Perera D, Pijls NH. Usefulness of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:469–76.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ferguson JJ 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ Jr, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1456–62.CrossRefPubMed Ferguson JJ 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ Jr, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1456–62.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–96.CrossRefPubMed Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–96.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wang J, Yu W, Gao M, Gu C, Yu Y. Preoperative Prophylactic Intraaortic Balloon Pump Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Short-Term Death of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2007–19.CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Yu W, Gao M, Gu C, Yu Y. Preoperative Prophylactic Intraaortic Balloon Pump Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Short-Term Death of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2007–19.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Poirier Y, Voisine P, Plourde G, et al. Efficacy and safety of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;207:67–79.CrossRefPubMed Poirier Y, Voisine P, Plourde G, et al. Efficacy and safety of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;207:67–79.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Deppe AC, Weber C, Liakopoulos OJ, et al. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in high-risk patients prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery decreases the risk for morbidity and mortality-A meta-analysis of 9,212 patients. J Card Surg. 2017;32:177–85.CrossRefPubMed Deppe AC, Weber C, Liakopoulos OJ, et al. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in high-risk patients prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery decreases the risk for morbidity and mortality-A meta-analysis of 9,212 patients. J Card Surg. 2017;32:177–85.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rampersad PP, Udell JA, Zawi R, et al. Preoperative Intraaortic Balloon Pump Improves Early Outcomes Following High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Prospective Study Design. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30:2–9.PubMed Rampersad PP, Udell JA, Zawi R, et al. Preoperative Intraaortic Balloon Pump Improves Early Outcomes Following High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Prospective Study Design. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30:2–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Baskett RJ, O’Connor GT, Hirsch GM, et al. The preoperative intraaortic balloon pump in coronary bypass surgery: a lack of evidence of effectiveness. Am Heart J. 2005;150(6):1122–7.CrossRefPubMed Baskett RJ, O’Connor GT, Hirsch GM, et al. The preoperative intraaortic balloon pump in coronary bypass surgery: a lack of evidence of effectiveness. Am Heart J. 2005;150(6):1122–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rocha Ferreira GS, de Almeida JP, Landoni G, et al. Effect of a Perioperative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e742–50.CrossRefPubMed Rocha Ferreira GS, de Almeida JP, Landoni G, et al. Effect of a Perioperative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e742–50.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Scherner M, et al. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump before urgent coronary bypass grafting. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2018;26:353–60.CrossRefPubMed Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Scherner M, et al. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump before urgent coronary bypass grafting. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2018;26:353–60.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ali JM, Abu-Omar Y. The intra-aortic balloon pump and other methods of mechanical circulatory support. Surgery (Oxford). 2018;36:68–74.CrossRef Ali JM, Abu-Omar Y. The intra-aortic balloon pump and other methods of mechanical circulatory support. Surgery (Oxford). 2018;36:68–74.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ratcliffe MB, Bavaria JE, Wenger RK, Bogen DK, Edmunds LH Jr. Left ventricular mechanics of ejecting, postischemic hearts during left ventricular circulatory assistance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:245–55.PubMed Ratcliffe MB, Bavaria JE, Wenger RK, Bogen DK, Edmunds LH Jr. Left ventricular mechanics of ejecting, postischemic hearts during left ventricular circulatory assistance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:245–55.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Abu-Omar Y, Tsui SS. Mechanical circulatory support for AMI and cardiogenic shock. J Card Surg. 2010;25:434–41.CrossRefPubMed Abu-Omar Y, Tsui SS. Mechanical circulatory support for AMI and cardiogenic shock. J Card Surg. 2010;25:434–41.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Beckmann A, Benk C, Beyersdorf F, et al. Position article for the use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:676–80.PubMed Beckmann A, Benk C, Beyersdorf F, et al. Position article for the use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:676–80.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:610–6.CrossRefPubMed Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:610–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Golding LA, Crouch RD, Stewart RW, et al. Postcardiotomy centrifugal mechanical ventricular support. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1059–63.CrossRefPubMed Golding LA, Crouch RD, Stewart RW, et al. Postcardiotomy centrifugal mechanical ventricular support. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1059–63.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Biancari F, Dalén M, Perrotti A, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting: Results of a multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;241:109–14.CrossRefPubMed Biancari F, Dalén M, Perrotti A, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting: Results of a multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;241:109–14.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M, et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:302–11.CrossRefPubMed Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M, et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:302–11.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hsu PS, Chen JL, Hong GJ, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery: predictors of early mortality and outcome from 51 adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:328–33.PubMed Hsu PS, Chen JL, Hong GJ, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery: predictors of early mortality and outcome from 51 adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:328–33.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Mikus E, Tripodi A, Calvi S, Giglio MD, Cavallucci A, Lamarra M. CentriMag venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as treatment for patients with refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2013;59:18–23.CrossRefPubMed Mikus E, Tripodi A, Calvi S, Giglio MD, Cavallucci A, Lamarra M. CentriMag venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as treatment for patients with refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2013;59:18–23.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Guihaire J, Van Dang S, Rouze S, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience of 92 cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25:363–9.CrossRefPubMed Guihaire J, Van Dang S, Rouze S, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience of 92 cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25:363–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencionista; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:E175–96.CrossRefPubMed Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencionista; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:E175–96.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kar B, Basra SS, Shah NR, Loyalka P. Percutaneous circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: interventional bridge to recovery. Circulation. 2012;125:1809–17.CrossRefPubMed Kar B, Basra SS, Shah NR, Loyalka P. Percutaneous circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: interventional bridge to recovery. Circulation. 2012;125:1809–17.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, Idelchik GM, Loyalka P. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:688–96.CrossRefPubMed Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, Idelchik GM, Loyalka P. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:688–96.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O'Neill WW. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2006;152:469.CrossRefPubMed Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O'Neill WW. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2006;152:469.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1276–83.CrossRefPubMed Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1276–83.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Lauten A, Engström AE, Jung C, et al. Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:23–30.CrossRefPubMed Lauten A, Engström AE, Jung C, et al. Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:23–30.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1584–8.CrossRefPubMed Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1584–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012;126:1717–27.CrossRefPubMed O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012;126:1717–27.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Pepino P, Coronella G, Oliviero P, et al. Successful use of the Impella Recover LP 5.0 device for circulatory support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:803–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pepino P, Coronella G, Oliviero P, et al. Successful use of the Impella Recover LP 5.0 device for circulatory support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:803–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Akay MH, Frazier OH. Impella Recover 5.0 assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg. 2010;25:606–7.CrossRefPubMed Akay MH, Frazier OH. Impella Recover 5.0 assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg. 2010;25:606–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Gregoric ID, Poglajen G, Span M, Frazier OH, Loyalka P, Kar B. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:637–9.CrossRefPubMed Gregoric ID, Poglajen G, Span M, Frazier OH, Loyalka P, Kar B. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:637–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Siegenthaler MP, Brehm K, Strecker T, et al. The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:812–22.CrossRefPubMed Siegenthaler MP, Brehm K, Strecker T, et al. The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:812–22.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Thomas MP, Altman A, Magovern GJ Jr, Moraca RJ. Insertion of an Abiomed Impella(R) left ventricular assist device following bioprosthetic aortic valve placement. J Card Surg. 2013;28:469–71.CrossRefPubMed Thomas MP, Altman A, Magovern GJ Jr, Moraca RJ. Insertion of an Abiomed Impella(R) left ventricular assist device following bioprosthetic aortic valve placement. J Card Surg. 2013;28:469–71.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Sinclair A, et al. A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Sinclair A, et al. A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Akay MH, Gregoric ID, Radovancevic R, Cohn WE, Frazier OH. Timely use of a CentriMag heart assist device improves survival in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Card Surg. 2011;26:548–52.CrossRefPubMed Akay MH, Gregoric ID, Radovancevic R, Cohn WE, Frazier OH. Timely use of a CentriMag heart assist device improves survival in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Card Surg. 2011;26:548–52.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Alsoufi B, Rao V, Tang A, Maganti M, Cusimano R. Risk modeling for ventricular assist device support in post-cardiotomy shock. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2012;24:69–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alsoufi B, Rao V, Tang A, Maganti M, Cusimano R. Risk modeling for ventricular assist device support in post-cardiotomy shock. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2012;24:69–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Mechanical support for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting
Authors
Jason M. Ali
Yasir Abu-Omar
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue Special Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0970-9134
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0740-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2018

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue