Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015

01-06-2015

C-Reactive protein and procalcitonin for the early detection of postoperative complications after sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary study in 97 patients

Authors: R. Kassir, P. Blanc, L. M. Bruna Tibalbo, C. Breton, P. Lointier

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fistula is the most fearsome complication after sleeve gastrectomy. The outcome depends on early and timely diagnosis. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have not been extensively evaluated in this context.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the interest of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) assay for the early detection of gastric fistula after sleeve gastrectomy and to study the PCT as an adjunctive marker to the CRP.

Setting

Private Practice.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively. This study was carried out in 97 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy between January 2011 and December 2012. The fistula is an abnormal connection between two organs. An abscess is a collection of pus.

Results

The rate of postoperative complications (fistulas and abscesses) was 7.2 %. The incidence of fistula was 2 % and the incidence of abscess was 5 %. Both CRP and PCT were significantly higher in patients with postoperative fistula or abscess. Mean CRP was 61.3 mg/l in patients without complications and 161.3 mg/l in case of complications (p = 0.02). Mean postoperative PCT was 0.062 ng/ml in uncomplicated patients versus 0.108 mg/l in those with complications (p = 0.0006). CRP and PCT measured during the postoperative period were correlated with the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Early detection of fistula or abscess after sleeve gastrectomy simplifies the management of these complications. While the ideal biomarker of infection does not yet exist, this study shows that clinical observations in association with CRP and PCT measurements could be of help for the early detection of septic complications after sleeve gastrectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL et al (2011) Third International Summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:749–759CrossRefPubMed Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL et al (2011) Third International Summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:749–759CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sarela AI, Simon PL, Dexter SPL et al (2012) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8–9-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8:679–684CrossRefPubMed Sarela AI, Simon PL, Dexter SPL et al (2012) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8–9-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8:679–684CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kehagias I, Spyropoulos C, Karamanakos S et al (2013) Efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as sole procedure in patients with clinically severe obesity (BMI <50 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:363–369CrossRefPubMed Kehagias I, Spyropoulos C, Karamanakos S et al (2013) Efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as sole procedure in patients with clinically severe obesity (BMI <50 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:363–369CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sheila J, Constantinos S, Evangelos E (2012) A very challenging leak from a sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:e56–e59 Sheila J, Constantinos S, Evangelos E (2012) A very challenging leak from a sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:e56–e59
5.
go back to reference Nedelcu M, Skalli M, Delhom E et al (2013) New CT scan classification of leak after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23:1341–1343CrossRefPubMed Nedelcu M, Skalli M, Delhom E et al (2013) New CT scan classification of leak after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23:1341–1343CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nedelcu AM, Skalli M, Deneve E et al (2013) Surgical management of chronic fistula after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:879–884CrossRefPubMed Nedelcu AM, Skalli M, Deneve E et al (2013) Surgical management of chronic fistula after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:879–884CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA (2012) Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc 26:1509–1515CrossRefPubMed Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA (2012) Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc 26:1509–1515CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: 5-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: 5-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Natoudi M et al (2013) C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:864–871CrossRefPubMed Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Natoudi M et al (2013) C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:864–871CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lagoutte N, Facy O, Ravoire A et al (2012) La protéine C réactive et la procalcitonine dans la détection précoce de la fistule anastomotique après chirurgie colorectale réglée : étude pilote chez 100 patients. J Chir 149:389–394 Lagoutte N, Facy O, Ravoire A et al (2012) La protéine C réactive et la procalcitonine dans la détection précoce de la fistule anastomotique après chirurgie colorectale réglée : étude pilote chez 100 patients. J Chir 149:389–394
11.
go back to reference Schuetz P, Albrich W, Mueller B (2011) Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present, and future. BMC Medecine 9:1–9CrossRef Schuetz P, Albrich W, Mueller B (2011) Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present, and future. BMC Medecine 9:1–9CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Csendes A, Burgos AM, Roizblatt D et al (2009) Inflammatory response measured by body temperature, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count 1, 3, and 5 days after laparotomic or laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 19:890–893CrossRefPubMed Csendes A, Burgos AM, Roizblatt D et al (2009) Inflammatory response measured by body temperature, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count 1, 3, and 5 days after laparotomic or laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 19:890–893CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Natoudi M et al (2013) C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:864–871CrossRefPubMed Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Natoudi M et al (2013) C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:864–871CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ruiz-Tovar J, Oller I, Galindo I et al (2013) Change in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum cortisol in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23:764–769CrossRefPubMed Ruiz-Tovar J, Oller I, Galindo I et al (2013) Change in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum cortisol in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23:764–769CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
C-Reactive protein and procalcitonin for the early detection of postoperative complications after sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary study in 97 patients
Authors
R. Kassir
P. Blanc
L. M. Bruna Tibalbo
C. Breton
P. Lointier
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3821-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015 Go to the issue