Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: an umbrella review

Authors: E. L. Bird, J. O. Ige, P. Pilkington, A. Pinto, C. Petrokofsky, J. Burgess-Allen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The built and natural environment and health are inextricably linked. However, there is considerable debate surrounding the strength and quality of the evidence base underpinning principles of good practice for built and natural environment design in promoting health. This umbrella review aimed to assess relationships between the built and natural environment and health, concentrating on five topic areas: neighbourhood design, housing, food environment, natural and sustainable environment, and transport.

Methods

A structured search was conducted for quantitative systematic reviews and stakeholder reviews published between January 2005 and April 2016. Seven databases and the websites of 15 relevant and respected stakeholder organisations known to publish review-level documentation were searched. Searches were limited to English-language publications and duplicate references were removed. Evidence quality and strength was appraised using validated techniques. Findings were used to develop a diagram for each topic area, illustrating relationships between built and natural environment planning principles and health-related outcomes.

Results

A total of 117 systematic reviews and review-level documents were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was mixed; much of the evidence examined relied on findings from cross-sectional studies, making it difficult to draw clear causal links between built environment exposures and health-related impacts and outcomes. Fourteen actionable planning principles associated with positive health-related outcomes were identified across the five topic areas. For example, neighbourhoods that enhanced walkability, were complete and compact in design, and those which enhanced connectivity through safe and efficient infrastructure were associated with better health-related outcomes relating to physical activity, social engagement, mental health, perceptions of crime, and road traffic collisions. Evidence for the effectiveness of planning principles across different topic areas and on reducing health inequalities was sparse and inconclusive.

Conclusions

Findings provide an up-to-date overview of relationships between the built and natural environment and health and present logical, evidence-based messages to aid communication between public health and planning professionals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frank LD, Engelke P. Multiple impacts of the built environment on public health: walkable places and the exposure to air pollution. Int Reg Sci Rev. 2005;28(2):193–216.CrossRef Frank LD, Engelke P. Multiple impacts of the built environment on public health: walkable places and the exposure to air pollution. Int Reg Sci Rev. 2005;28(2):193–216.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, et al. (2010). Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, et al. (2010). Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Renalds A, Smith TH, Hale PJ. A systematic review of built environment and health. Fam Community Health. 2010;33(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed Renalds A, Smith TH, Hale PJ. A systematic review of built environment and health. Fam Community Health. 2010;33(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood DT, Greaves F, Harper L, Hawe P, Moore L, Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Sheill A, Thomas J, White M. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017;390:2602–4.CrossRefPubMed Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood DT, Greaves F, Harper L, Hawe P, Moore L, Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Sheill A, Thomas J, White M. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017;390:2602–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pilkington P, Powell J, Davis A. Evidence-based decision making when designing environments for physical activity: the role of public health. Sports Med. 2016;46(376):1–6. Pilkington P, Powell J, Davis A. Evidence-based decision making when designing environments for physical activity: the role of public health. Sports Med. 2016;46(376):1–6.
6.
go back to reference Lekkas P, Paquet C, Howard NJ, Daniel M. Illuminating the lifecourse of place in the longitudinal study of neightbourhoods and health. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:239–47.CrossRefPubMed Lekkas P, Paquet C, Howard NJ, Daniel M. Illuminating the lifecourse of place in the longitudinal study of neightbourhoods and health. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:239–47.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, et al. Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of health and health inequalities of organisational changes to the psychosocial work environment. Prev Med. 2009;48:454–61.CrossRefPubMed Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, et al. Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of health and health inequalities of organisational changes to the psychosocial work environment. Prev Med. 2009;48:454–61.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cairns J, Warren J, Garthwaite K, et al. Go slow: an umbrella review of the effects of 20 mph zones and limits on health and health inequalities. Journal of Public Health. 2015;37(3):515–20.CrossRefPubMed Cairns J, Warren J, Garthwaite K, et al. Go slow: an umbrella review of the effects of 20 mph zones and limits on health and health inequalities. Journal of Public Health. 2015;37(3):515–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Horodyska K, Luszczynska A, van den Berg M, et al. Good practice characteristics of diet and physical activity interventions and policies: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horodyska K, Luszczynska A, van den Berg M, et al. Good practice characteristics of diet and physical activity interventions and policies: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, et al. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e173–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, et al. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e173–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: an umbrella review
Authors
E. L. Bird
J. O. Ige
P. Pilkington
A. Pinto
C. Petrokofsky
J. Burgess-Allen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5870-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue