Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Breast cancers missed by screening radiologists can be detected by reading mammograms at a distance

Authors: Ineke L. Schreutelkamp, Robert M. Kwee, Peter Veekmans, Miraude E. A. P. M. Adriaensen

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

During locally organized quality assurance evaluation sessions for screening radiologists, we noticed that individual screening radiologists did miss tumours which in our opinion could be detected at a distance.

Aim

To determine whether tumours missed by individual screening radiologists can be detected at a distance.

Methods

Twenty-eight screening mammograms of 28 females (mean age 63 years, range 49–73) with a pathologically proven malignant tumour missed by individual screening radiologists were mixed with 56 normal screening mammograms of 56 females (mean age 63 years, range 53–74). This test set was independently assessed by a senior screening radiologist and by a radiology resident without prior training in screening mammography at 1.5 m distance from the screen display. Readers were unaware of the prevalence of pathologically proven malignant tumours in the test set. Primary outcome was whether the reader would recall the woman.

Results

The senior screening radiologist recalled 28 of 28 women with a pathologically proven malignant tumour (sensitivity of 100%) and 16 of 56 women without pathology (specificity of 71%). The radiology resident recalled 25 of 28 women with a pathologically proven malignant tumour (sensitivity of 89%) and 10 of 56 women without pathology (specificity of 82%).

Conclusion

Some malignant tumours missed by an individual screening radiologist can be detected from 1.5 m distance. Therefore, we recommend that screening radiologists consciously take a distant view before closely evaluating the mammogram in detail.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Fracheboud J, van Luijt PA, Sankatsing VD et al (2014) National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands. 1990–2011/2012 (XIII). Thirteenth evaluation report. National Evaluation Team for Breast cancer screening (NETB), Rotterdam Fracheboud J, van Luijt PA, Sankatsing VD et al (2014) National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands. 1990–2011/2012 (XIII). Thirteenth evaluation report. National Evaluation Team for Breast cancer screening (NETB), Rotterdam
4.
go back to reference Boyer B, Hauret L, Bellaiche R, Gräf C, Bourcier B, Fichet G (2004) Retrospectively detectable carcinomas: review of the literature. J Radiol 85:2071–2078CrossRefPubMed Boyer B, Hauret L, Bellaiche R, Gräf C, Bourcier B, Fichet G (2004) Retrospectively detectable carcinomas: review of the literature. J Radiol 85:2071–2078CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, Holli K, Isola J, Kärkkäinen A, Pakkanen J, Piironen A, Salo A, Hakama M (1999) The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme. Eur J Cancer 35:1118–1122CrossRefPubMed Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, Holli K, Isola J, Kärkkäinen A, Pakkanen J, Piironen A, Salo A, Hakama M (1999) The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme. Eur J Cancer 35:1118–1122CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Zonderland HM et al (2012) The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool. Eur Radiol 22:5CrossRef Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Zonderland HM et al (2012) The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool. Eur Radiol 22:5CrossRef
7.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2013) American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS), 5th edn. Reston (Va) American College of Radiology (2013) American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS), 5th edn. Reston (Va)
8.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nodine CF, Kundel HL (1987) Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics 7:1241–1250CrossRefPubMed Nodine CF, Kundel HL (1987) Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics 7:1241–1250CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Daly CA, Apthorp L, Field S (1998) Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier? Clin Radiol 53:25–28CrossRefPubMed Daly CA, Apthorp L, Field S (1998) Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier? Clin Radiol 53:25–28CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GP, MacMillan JH (1997) Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204:131–135CrossRefPubMed Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GP, MacMillan JH (1997) Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204:131–135CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Haygood TM, Wang J, Atkinson EN, Lane D, Stephens TW, Patel P, Whitman GJ (2009) Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:216–220CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Haygood TM, Wang J, Atkinson EN, Lane D, Stephens TW, Patel P, Whitman GJ (2009) Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:216–220CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Pijnappel RM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2014) Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt. Eur Radiol 24:294–304CrossRefPubMed Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Pijnappel RM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2014) Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt. Eur Radiol 24:294–304CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Qaqish BF, Barlow WE, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R (2007) Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology 243:681–689CrossRefPubMed Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Qaqish BF, Barlow WE, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R (2007) Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology 243:681–689CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pow RE, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan P (2016) Evaluation of the effect of double reporting on test accuracy in screening and diagnostic imaging studies: a review of the evidence. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 60(3):306–314CrossRefPubMed Pow RE, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan P (2016) Evaluation of the effect of double reporting on test accuracy in screening and diagnostic imaging studies: a review of the evidence. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 60(3):306–314CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breast cancers missed by screening radiologists can be detected by reading mammograms at a distance
Authors
Ineke L. Schreutelkamp
Robert M. Kwee
Peter Veekmans
Miraude E. A. P. M. Adriaensen
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1828-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 1/2019 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.