Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Breast Cancer | Research

Social inequalities in breast cancer screening: evaluating written communications with immigrant Haitian women in Montreal

Authors: Marie-France Raynault, Christelle Féthière, Dominique Côté

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The province of Quebec (Canada) has implemented a breast cancer screening program to diagnose this cancer at an early stage. The strategy is to refer women 50 to 69 years old for a mammogram every two years by sending an invitation letter that acts as a prescription. Ninety per cent (90%) of deaths due to breast cancer occur in women aged 50 and over. Numerous studies have shown social inequalities in health for most diseases. With breast cancer, a significant paradox arises: its incidence is lower among disadvantaged women and yet, more of them die from this disease. The health care system might play a role in this inequality. The scientific literature documents the potential for creating such inequalities when prevention does not consider equity among social groups. Immigrant women are often disadvantaged. They die of breast cancer more than non-immigrants. Studies attribute this to late-stage diagnosis due to poor adherence to mammography screening programs.

Purpose of the study

The main objective of our research is to assess how Haitian immigrant women in Montreal are reached by the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program, and specifically how they perceive the mammogram referral letter sent by the program.

Methods

The study uses a two-step qualitative method: i) In-depth interviews with influential community workers to identify the most relevant issues; ii) Focus groups with disadvantaged women from Montreal’s Haitian community.

Results

A mammogram referral letter from the Breast Cancer Screening Program may be a barrier to compliance with mammography by underprivileged Haitian women in Montreal. This might be attributable to a low level of literacy, poor knowledge of the disease, and lack of financial resources.

Conclusion

Barriers may be underestimated in underprivileged immigrant and non-immigrant communities. A preventive strategy must be adapted to different sub-groups and must also take into account lower literacy levels. To increase mammography uptake, it is crucial that the benefits of prevention be clearly identified and described in understandable terms. Finally, economic access to follow-up measures should be considered.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Dunbrack J. Breast cancer: economic impact and labour force re-entry. Ottawa: Canadian Breast Cancer Network; 2010. 46 p.
4.
Boucher P, Beauregard H. Le coût économique du cancer, en 2008 [the economic costs of cancer, in 2008]. Montréal: Coalition Priorité Cancer au Québec; 2010.
5.
Vandal N, Daigle J-M, Hébert-Croteau N, Théberge I, Major D, Bisson J. Évolution de la mortalité par cancer du sein depuis l’implantation du programme québécois de dépistage du cancer du sein (PQDCS). Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec; 2009. p. 14.
6.
7.
8.
Mahamoud A. Breast cancer screening in Racialized women; implications for health equity. Toronto: Report for the Wellesley Institute; 2014.
9.
10.
Vahabi M. Knowledge of breast cancer and screening practices among Iranian immigrant women in Toronto. J Community Health. 2011;36(2):265–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Black D. Inequalities in health: report of a research working group. London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.
13.
World Health Organisation Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
14.
Marmot M. Fair society, healthy lives–strategic review of Heatlh inequalities in England post-2010. London: UCL Institute of Health Equity; 2010.
15.
Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):417–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10552-008-9256-0.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Yabroff KR, Gordis L. Does stage at diagnosis influence the observed relationship between socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence, case-fatality, and mortality? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2265–79.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Jack RH, Davies EA, Moller H. Breast cancer incidence, stage, treatment and survival in ethnic groups in south East England. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(3):545–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, Abraham L, Barbash RB, Strzelczyk J, et al. Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):541–53.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice, the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):216–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
26.
27.
Kawar LN. Barriers to breast cancer screening participation among Jordanian and Palestinian American women. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;179(1):88–94.CrossRef
28.
Guidry JJ, Matthews-Juarez P, Copeland VA. Barriers to breast cancer control for African-American women. Cancer. 2003;97(Suppl 1):318–23.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Fouron F, DeRepentigny G. Répartition spatiale des immigrants dans la RMR de Montréal. Montréal City: Série Portraits démographiques [Spatial Distribution of Immigrants in the Montreal CMS. Demographic Profile Series]; 2010. 14 pages.
30.
Leblanc EM, Boisvert N, Leaune V. Le portrait de la participation des Montréalaises au PQDCS — CSSS d’Ahuntsic et Montréal-Nord [profile of Montrealers’ participation in the Québec breast cancer screening program — CSSS d’Ahuntsic et Montréal-Nord ]. Montréal: Direction de santé publique de l'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal; 2009.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Ministère de l’Immigration, de la Diversité et de l’Inclusion du Québec. Portrait statistique de la population d’origine ethnique haïtienne au Québec en 2011[statistical profile of the Haitian population in Québec in 2011]. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec; 2014.
35.
Polgar S, Thomas SA. Introduction to research in the health sciences. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
36.
37.
Touré EH. Réflexion épistémologique Sur l’usage des focus groups : fondements scientifiques et problèmes de scientificité. Recherche Qual. 2010;29(1):5–27.
38.
Welch VA, Norheim OF, Jull J, Cookson R, Sommerfelt H, Tugwell P. CONSORT-equity 2017 extension and elaboration for better reporting of health equity in randomised trials. BMJ. 2017;359:j5085.PubMedCrossRef
39.
40.
Jull J, Petticrew M, Kristjansson E, Yoganathan M, Petkovic J, Tugwell P, et al. Engaging knowledge users in development of the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: a qualitative study using in depth interviews. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(34). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40900-018-0118-y.
41.
42.
Geoffrion P. Le groupe de discussion [focus groups]. In: Gauthier B, Beaud JP, editors. Recherche sociale: De la problématique à la collecte des données. 5th ed. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2009. p. 303–28.
43.
Blais M, Martineau S. L’analyse inductive générale : description d’une démarche visant à Donner un Sens à des données brutes [general inductive analysis: description of an approach designed to give meaning to raw data]. Recherche Qual. 2006;26(2):18.
44.
Comeau Y. L'analyse des données qualitatives [qualitative data analysis]Cahiers du CRISE, collection Études théoriques; 1994. p. ET9402.
45.
World Health Organisation. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
46.
Darcovich N, Jones S, Kirsh IS, Levin HM, Murray TS, Rubenson K, et al. Literacy skills for the knowledge society: further results of the international adult literacy survey. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Human Resources Development Canada; 1997. p. 195.
47.
Komenaka IK, Nodora JN, Hsu C-H, Martinez ME, Gandhi SG, Bouton ME, et al. Association of Health Literacy with adherence to screening mammography guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):852–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza JI. Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1:CD002943.
49.
Major D. Déterminants de la qualité des programmes organisés de dépistage du cancer du sein [determinants of the quality of organized breast cancer screening programs]. Ottawa: Santé Canada, Groupe de travail Sur les déterminants de la qualité; 2003.
50.
Champion V, Maraj M, Hui S, Perkins AJ, Tierney W, Menon U, et al. Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Prev Med. 2003;36(2):150–8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Luckmann R, White MJ, Spitz AJ, Clemow L. Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(1):39–46.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Dubois N. Les effets du programme québécois de dépistage du cancer du sein Sur l’utilisation des services de dépistage par mammographie [the effects of the Québec breast cancer screening program on the use of mammography services] [dissertation]. Montréal: École nationale d’administration publique (ENAP); 2008.
53.
Lepage C, Borduas F, Gagnon C, Grégoire L, Messely M-C, Moreault L, et al. Les interventions favorisant la participation des femmes au dépistage par mammographie : revue de la littérature [interventions fostering women’s participation in screening mammography: literature review]. Québec: Direction régionale de santé publique and Agence de développement de réseaux locaux de services de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale nationale; 2005.
54.
Richards CL, Viadro CI, Earp JA. Bringing down the barriers to mammography: a review of current research and interventions. Breast Dis. 1998;10(3):33–44.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Shields M, Wilkins K. An update on mammography use in Canada. Health Rep. 2009;20(3):7–19.PubMed
56.
Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine D. Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med. 2003;37(5):475–84.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Wang JH, Mandelblatt JS, Liang W, Yi B, Ma IJ, Schwartz MD. Knowledge, cultural, and attitudinal barriers to mammography screening among nonadherent immigrant Chinese women. Cancer. 2009;115(20):4828–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Barg FK, Grier SA. Enhancing breast cancer communications: a cultural models approach. Int J Res Mark. 2008;25(4):335–42.CrossRef
64.
Rajaram SS, Rashidi A. Minority women and breast cancer screening: the role of cultural explanatory models. Prev Med. 1998;27(5):757–64.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Klassen AC, Smith KC. The enduring and evolving relationship between social class and breast cancer burden: a review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(3):217–34.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Purc-Stephenson RJ, Gorey KM. Lower adherence to screening mammography guidelines among ethnic minority women in America: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):479–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman M. Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(1):5–19.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Social inequalities in breast cancer screening: evaluating written communications with immigrant Haitian women in Montreal
Authors
Marie-France Raynault
Christelle Féthière
Dominique Côté
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01322-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research

Limited access to family-based addiction prevention services for socio-economically deprived families in Switzerland: a grounded theory study

Research

The potential of mobile health clinics in chronic disease prevention and health promotion in universal healthcare systems. An on-field experiment

Research

Homeownership status and risk of food insecurity: examining the role of housing debt, housing expenditure and housing asset using a cross-sectional population-based survey of Canadian households

Research

Values are not enough: qualitative study identifying critical elements for prioritization of health equity in health systems

Commentary

Who is going to pay the price of Covid-19? Reflections about an unequal Brazil

Research

Ethnic inequalities in child stunting and feeding practices: results from surveys in thirteen countries from Latin America