Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 2/2020

01-03-2020 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Influence of breast density on breast cancer risk: a case control study in Japanese women

Authors: Keiko Nishiyama, Naruto Taira, Taeko Mizoo, Mariko Kochi, Hirokuni Ikeda, Takayuki Iwamoto, Tadahiko Shien, Hiroyoshi Doihara, Setuko Ishihara, Hiroshi Kawai, Kensuke Kawasaki, Yoichi Ishibe, Yutaka Ogasawara, Shinichi Toyooka

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mammography is the standard examination for breast cancer screening of woman aged ≥ 40 years. High breast density on mammography indicates that mammary gland parenchyma occupy a high percentage of the breast. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with breast density and the risk of high breast density for breast cancer.

Methods

A multicenter case–control study was performed in 530 patients and 1043 controls. Breast density was classified as C1–C4 using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Clinical factors were obtained from questionnaires or medical records, and the influence of each factor (breast density, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), parity, presence or absence of breastfeeding history, age at menarche, age at first birth, and familial history of breast cancer) on breast cancer risk in all patients was calculated as an age-adjusted odds ratio (OR). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then performed in all patients and in pre- and postmenopausal and BMI-stratified groups using factors with a significant age-adjusted OR as adjustment factors.

Results

Age-adjusted ORs for breast cancer were significant for breast density, BMI, parity, and breast feeding, but not for age at menarche, age at first birth, or family history of breast cancer. In multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between breast density and breast cancer in postmenopausal women (OR for C1 vs. C2 1.90 [95% CI 1.34–2.70]; C1 vs. C4 2.85 [95% CI 1.10–7.16]). This correlation was also significant in patients in the third BMI quartile (22.3–24.5 kg/m2) (OR for C1 vs. C4 8.76 [95% CI 2.38–42.47]); and fourth BMI quartile (>24.5 kg/m2) (OR for C1 vs. C2 1.92 [95% CI 1.17–3.15]; C1 vs. C4 11.89 [95% CI 1.56–245.17]).

Conclusion

Breast density on mammography is a risk factor for breast cancer after adjustment for other risk factors. This risk is particularly high in postmenopausal women and those with a high BMI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:793–806.CrossRef Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:793–806.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS®-Mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Ragiology; 2013. pp 181–9 American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS®-Mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Ragiology; 2013. pp 181–9
3.
go back to reference Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168–75.CrossRef Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1159–69.CrossRef McCormack VA, dos Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1159–69.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kotsuma Y, Tamaki Y, Nishimura T, Tsubai M, Ueda S, Shimazu K, et al. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women. Breast. 2008;17:27–35.CrossRef Kotsuma Y, Tamaki Y, Nishimura T, Tsubai M, Ueda S, Shimazu K, et al. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women. Breast. 2008;17:27–35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nagao Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sugiyama Y, Saji S, Kashiki Y. Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:228–33.CrossRef Nagao Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sugiyama Y, Saji S, Kashiki Y. Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:228–33.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, Nagao Y, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2102–6.CrossRef Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, Nagao Y, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2102–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL, Ingman WV, Henderson MA, Hopper JL, et al. Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:479–502.CrossRef Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL, Ingman WV, Henderson MA, Hopper JL, et al. Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:479–502.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taira N, Arai M, Ikeda M, Iwasaki M, Okamura H, Takamatsu K, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines for epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer, 2015 edition. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:343–56.CrossRef Taira N, Arai M, Ikeda M, Iwasaki M, Okamura H, Takamatsu K, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines for epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer, 2015 edition. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:343–56.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1257–61.CrossRef Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1257–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ishihara S, Taira N, Kawasaki K, Ishibe Y, Mizoo T, Nishiyama K, et al. Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67:145–51.PubMed Ishihara S, Taira N, Kawasaki K, Ishibe Y, Mizoo T, Nishiyama K, et al. Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67:145–51.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Uematsu T. The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:26–31.CrossRef Uematsu T. The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:26–31.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5.CrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, Olshan AF, Yankaskas BC, Millikan RC. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in White and African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:571–80.CrossRef Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, Olshan AF, Yankaskas BC, Millikan RC. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in White and African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:571–80.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44.
16.
go back to reference Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1087–92.CrossRef Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1087–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, Santos Silva ID, McCormack V, Baglietto L, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:78.CrossRef Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, Santos Silva ID, McCormack V, Baglietto L, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:78.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wada K, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Oze I, Wakai K, et al. Body mass index and breast cancer risk in Japan: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:519–24.CrossRef Wada K, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Oze I, Wakai K, et al. Body mass index and breast cancer risk in Japan: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:519–24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference WCRFAIfC. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007. WCRFAIfC. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.
20.
go back to reference Wong CS, Lim GH, Gao F, Jakes RW, Offman J, Chia KS, et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:871–4.CrossRef Wong CS, Lim GH, Gao F, Jakes RW, Offman J, Chia KS, et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:871–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of breast density on breast cancer risk: a case control study in Japanese women
Authors
Keiko Nishiyama
Naruto Taira
Taeko Mizoo
Mariko Kochi
Hirokuni Ikeda
Takayuki Iwamoto
Tadahiko Shien
Hiroyoshi Doihara
Setuko Ishihara
Hiroshi Kawai
Kensuke Kawasaki
Yoichi Ishibe
Yutaka Ogasawara
Shinichi Toyooka
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01018-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Breast Cancer 2/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine