Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2024

09-01-2024 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: A patient survey

Authors: Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless, Gail Larocque, Muriel Brackstone, Angel Arnaout, Jean-Michel Caudrelier, Denise Boone, Parvaneh Fallah, Terry Ng, Peter Cross, Nasser Alqahtani, John Hilton, Lisa Vandermeer, Gregory Pond, Mark Clemons

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Despite limited evidence supporting its effectiveness, most guidelines recommend long-term, routinely scheduled in-person surveillance of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased use of virtual care. This survey evaluated patient perspectives on follow-up care.

Methods

Patients with EBC undergoing surveillance were surveyed about follow-up protocols, perceptions, and interest in clinical trials assessing different follow-up strategies.

Results

Of 402 approached patients 270 completed the survey (response rate 67%). Median age 62.5 years (range 25–86) and median time since breast cancer diagnosis was 3.8 years (range < 1–33 years). Most (n = 148/244, 60%) were followed by more than one provider. Routine follow-ups with breast examination were mostly conducted by medical/radiation oncologists every 6 months (n = 110/236, 46%) or annually (n = 106/236, 44%). Participants felt routine follow-up was useful to monitor for recurrence, manage side effects of cancer treatment and to provide support/reassurance. Most participants felt regular follow-up care would detect recurrent cancer earlier (n = 214/255, 96%) and increase survival (n = 218/249, 88%). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of in-person visits for 54% of patients (n = 63/117). Patients were concerned this reduction of in-person visits would lead to later detection of both local (n = 29/63, 46%) and distant recurrences (n = 25/63, 40%). While many felt their medical and radiation oncologists were the most suited to provide follow-up care, 55% felt comfortable having their primary care provider (PCP) conduct surveillance. When presented with a scenario where follow-up has no effect on earlier detection or survival, 70% of patients still wanted routine in-person follow-up for reassurance (63%) with the goal of earlier recurrence detection (56%).

Conclusions

Despite limited evidence of effectiveness of routine in-person assessment, patients continue to place importance on regularly scheduled in-person follow-up.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference de Bock GH, Bonnema J, van der Hage J et al (2004) Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive Breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:4010–4018. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.080CrossRef de Bock GH, Bonnema J, van der Hage J et al (2004) Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive Breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:4010–4018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​06.​080CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference National Institute for Healthcare and Excellence Improving outcomes in breast cancer National Institute for Healthcare and Excellence Improving outcomes in breast cancer
11.
go back to reference Cancer Care Ontario (2010) Cancer Care Ontario’s position. Guidelines for Breast Cancer Well Follow Up Care Cancer Care Ontario (2010) Cancer Care Ontario’s position. Guidelines for Breast Cancer Well Follow Up Care
12.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2023) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2023) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology 2023
20.
go back to reference European Comission (2019) Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health. EXPH) European Comission (2019) Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health. EXPH)
21.
go back to reference World Health Organization Taking stock (2008) : Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages: World Health Organization Taking stock (2008) : Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages:
27.
go back to reference Sisler J, Chaput G, Sussman J, Ozokwelu E (2016) Follow-up after treatment for Breast cancer: practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 62:805–811PubMedPubMedCentral Sisler J, Chaput G, Sussman J, Ozokwelu E (2016) Follow-up after treatment for Breast cancer: practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 62:805–811PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: A patient survey
Authors
Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless
Gail Larocque
Muriel Brackstone
Angel Arnaout
Jean-Michel Caudrelier
Denise Boone
Parvaneh Fallah
Terry Ng
Peter Cross
Nasser Alqahtani
John Hilton
Lisa Vandermeer
Gregory Pond
Mark Clemons
Publication date
09-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07232-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine