Top

BMC Cancer

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Breast Cancer | Research

Rehabilitation interventions to support return to work for women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Naomi Algeo, Kathleen Bennett, Deirdre Connolly

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Research recommends the development and evaluation of interventions to support women with breast cancer in returning to, or managing, work. Despite this, there has historically been a paucity of rehabilitation interventions to support women with breast cancer to maintain or return to their work role. The aim of this systematic review was to examine key characteristics of rehabilitation interventions, and their effectiveness on work outcomes for women with breast cancer, compared to usual care.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of controlled studies of rehabilitation interventions with work outcomes for women with breast cancer. Six databases were systematically searched: EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Results are presented either as pooled odds ratio (OR) or pooled effect size (hedges g) between groups, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Narrative synthesis was conducted on intervention outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis.

Results

Five thousand, five hundred and thirty-five studies were identified. Nine out of 28 abstracts met inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis for most outcomes. Of the interventions included in meta-analysis, no significant differences compared to usual care were found for sick leave (2 studies (12 months); OR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.66 to 1.87), number of sick days taken (2 studies (six months); difference in effect: − 0.08, (95% CI: − 0.48 to 0.38) or working hours (2 studies (12 months); 0.19, (95% CI: − 0.20 to 0.64). Only one study, with a multidisciplinary intervention, showed a significant difference for work outcomes when compared to usual care. Work-specific content featured in three interventions only, none of which provided conclusive evidence for improvement in work outcomes. Enhanced physical and psychological sequalae, and quality of life was observed in some studies.

Conclusion

There remains a lack of effective and methodologically rigorous rehabilitation intervention studies for breast cancer survivors. The development and evaluation of effective rehabilitation interventions to support return to work is warranted.

Available only for authorised users

GLOBOCAN. All cancers fact sheet. World Health Organization: 2018. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf

American Cancer Society. Survival Rates for breast cancer. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2019. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/understanding-a-breast-cancer-diagnosis/breast-cancer-survival-rates.html

Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer survival. London: Cancer Research UK; 2020. Available at: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/survival

National Cancer Registry Ireland. Cancer in Ireland 1994–2017 with estimates for 2017-2019: Annual report of the national cancer registry. National Cancer Registry Ireland 2019. Available at: https://www.ncri.ie/sites/ncri/files/pubs/NCRI_Annual%20Report2019_01102019.pdf

Parkinson M, Maheu C. Cancer and work. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2019;29:258–266. PMC6970012.

Balak F, Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, Ten Berge EE, Groothoff JW. Return to work after early-stage breast cancer: a cohort study into the effects of treatment and cancer-related symptoms. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(3):267–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9146-z.CrossRefPubMed

Chaker L, Falla A, van der Lee SJ, Muka T, Imo D, Jaspers L, et al. The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: a systematic review. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(5):357–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0026-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3446-1.CrossRefPubMed

Todd BL, Feuerstein EL, Feuerstein M. When breast cancer survivors report cognitive problems at work. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 2011;42(3):279–94. https://doi.org/10.2190/PM.42.3.d.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Carlsen K, Jensen AJ, Rugulies R, Christensen J, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, et al. Self-reported work ability in long-term breast cancer survivors. A population-based questionnaire study in Denmark. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(2):423–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.744877.CrossRefPubMed

11.

de Sire A, Losco L, Cisari C, Gennari A, Boldorini R, Fusco N, et al. Axillary web syndrome in women after breast cancer surgery referred to an Oncological Rehabilitation Unit: which are the main risk factors? A retrospective case-control study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020a;24(15):8028–35. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202008_22486.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Mangone M, Bernetti A, Agostini F, Paoloni M, De Cicco FA, Capobianco SV, et al. Changes in spine alignment and postural balance after breast Cancer surgery: a rehabilitative point of view. Biores Open Access. 2019;8(1):121–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

de Sire A, Losco L, Cigna E, Lippi L, Gimigliano F, Gennari A, et al. Three-dimensional laser scanning as a reliable and reproducible diagnostic tool in breast cancer related lymphedema rehabilitation: a proof-of-principle study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020b;24(8):4476–85. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202004_21030.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Paolucci T, Bernetti A, Paoloni M, Capobianco SV, Bai AV, Lai C, Pierro L, Rotundi M, Damiani C, Santilli V, Agostini F, Mangone M. Therapeutic Alliance in a Single Versus Group Rehabilitative Setting After Breast Cancer Surgery: Psychological Profile and Performance Rehabilitation. Biores Open Access. 2019;8(1): 101–110. doi: 10.1089/biores.2019.0011.

15.

de Boer AGEM, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MHW, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. [Internet]. 2015;2015(9):CD007569. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007569.pub3.

16.

Hegewald J, Wegewitz UE, Euler U, van Dijk JL, Adams J, Fista A, Heinrich P, Seidler A. Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2019;3(3):CD010748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010748.pub2.

17.

Fadyl JK, Anstiss D, Reed K, Khoronzhevych M, Levack WMM. Effectiveness of vocational interventions for gaining paid work for people living with mild to moderate mental health conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e039699. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Nevala N, Pehkponen I, Teittinen A, Vesala HT, Pörtfors P, Anttila H. The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on the employment and functioning of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):773–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09837-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Hoving JL, Broekhuizen ML, Frings-Dresen MH. Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(117):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-117.CrossRef

20.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.CrossRef

21.

Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JMM, Kyle RG. Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled study. Trials. 2013;14(175):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-175

22.

Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5^th ed. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available at www.handbook.cochrane.org.

23.

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Von Hippel PT. The heterogeneity statistic I² can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(35):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.

25.

Ibrahim M, Muanza T, Smirnow N, Sateren W, Fournier B, Kavan P, et al. Time course of upper limb function and return-to-work post-radiotherapy in young adults with breast cancer: a pilot randomized control trial on effects of targeted exercise program. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(6):791–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0617-0.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, Pamenter R, Courneya KS, Markwell S, et al. A randomised trial to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(4):935–46. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818e0e1b.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Maguire P, Brooke M, Tait A, Thomas C, Sellwood R. The effect of counselling on physical disability and social recovery after mastectomy. Clin Oncol. 1983;9(4):319–24 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6362943/.PubMed

28.

Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L, Frasure-Smith N. Randomized trial of a psychologic distress screening program after breast cancer: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(10):2747–55. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2747.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Björneklett HG, Rosenblad A, Lindemalm C, Ojutkangas M-L, Letocha H, Strang P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of support group intervention after breast cancer treatment: results on sick leave, health care utilization and health economy. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.734921.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bolam KA, Mijwel S, Rundqvist H, Wengström Y. Two-year follow-up of the OptiTrain randomised controlled exercise trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175(3):637–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05204-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Jong MC, Boers I, van der Velden Schouten AP, van der Meij S, Göker E, Timmer-Bonte ANJH. Can Wietmarschen. A randomized study of yoga for fatigue and quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing (neo) adjuvant chemo- therapy. J Alternat Complement Med. 2018;24(9):942–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0191.CrossRef

32.

Mourgues C, Gerbaud L, Leger S, Auclair C, Peyrol F, Blanquet M, et al. Positive and cost-effectiveness effect of spa therapy on the resumption of occupational and non-occupational activities in women in breast cancer remission: a french multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(2014):505–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.04.008.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Howell D, Harth T, Brown J, Bennett C, Boyko S. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(4):1323–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3500-z.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lamore K, Dubois T, Rothe U, Leonardi M, Girard I, Manuwald U, et al. Return to work interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review and a methodological critique. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081343.CrossRefPubMedCentral

35.

Cramp F & Byron-Daniel J. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006145.pub3.

36.

Goedendorp MM, Gielissen MFM, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G. Psychosocial interventions for reducing fatigue during cancer treatment in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006953.pub2.

37.

Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cardwell CR, Mills M & Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2.

38.

Islam T, Dahlui M, Abd Majid H, Nahar AM, Taib N, Su TT, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(Suppl 3):S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Boyages J, Kalfa S, Xu Y, Koelmeyer L, Mackie H, Viveros H, et al. Worse and worse off: the impact of lymphedema on work and career after breast cancer. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2300-8.CrossRef

40.

Bilodeau K, Tremblay D, Durand MJ. Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(6):1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3526-2.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Dong X, Yi X, Ding M, Gao Z, McDonagh DJ, Yi N, et al. A longitudinal study of a multicomponent exercise intervention with remote guidance among breast Cancer patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103425.CrossRefPubMedCentral

42.

Invernizzi M, de Sire A, Lippi L, Venetis K, Sajjadi E, Gimigliano F, et al. Impact of Rehabilitation on Breast Cancer Related Fatigue: A Pilot Study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:556718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.556718.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Désiron HAM, Donceel P, de Rijk A, van Hoof E. A conceptual-practice model for occupational therapy to facilitate return to work in breast cancer patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):516–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9427-z.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

45.

Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0154-6.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Stevens CL, Hegel MT, Bakitas MA, et al. Study protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial of a rehabilitation intervention to reduce participation restrictions among female breast cancer survivors. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e036864. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Sheppard DM, Frost D, Jefford M, O’Connor M, Halkett G. ‘Beyond Cancer’: a study protocol of a multimodal occupational rehabilitation programme to support breast cancer survivors to return to work. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e032505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

de Groef A, Devoogdt N, Van der Gucht E, et al. EduCan trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, emotional and work-related functioning. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e025742. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025742.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Czajkowski SM, Powell LH, Adler N, Naar-King S, Reynolds KD, Hunter CM, et al. From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol. 2015;34(10):971–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2010;35(2):215–47. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961.CrossRef

Title: Rehabilitation interventions to support return to work for women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Naomi Algeo
Kathleen Bennett
Deirdre Connolly
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Published in: BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08613-x

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Pre-existing interstitial lung disease is associated with onset of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in patients with solid tumors: a retrospective analysis

MiR-105-3p acts as an oncogene to promote the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells by targeting GOLIM4

Circ_0003266 sponges miR-503-5p to suppress colorectal cancer progression via regulating PDCD4 expression

AGITG MASTERPLAN: a randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX alone or in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with high-risk and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Exercise efficacy and prescription during treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review

Exploratory analysis of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node status for optimal management of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in advanced lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer