Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

Re-interpretation of PAM50 gene expression as quantitative tumor dimensions shows utility for clinical trials: application to prognosis and response to paclitaxel in breast cancer

Authors: Nicola J. Camp, Michael J. Madsen, Jesús Herranz, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Amparo Ruiz, Miguel Martín, Philip S. Bernard

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We recently showed PAM50 gene expression data can be represented by five quantitative, orthogonal, multi-gene breast tumor traits. These novel tumor ‘dimensions’ were superior to categorical intrinsic subtypes for clustering in high-risk breast cancer pedigrees, indicating potential to represent underlying genetic susceptibilities and biological pathways. Here we explore the prognostic and predictive utility of these dimensions in a sub-study of GEICAM/9906, a Phase III randomized prospective clinical trial of paclitaxel in breast cancer.

Methods

Tumor dimensions, PC1–PC5, were calculated using pre-defined coefficients. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards (PH) models for disease-free survival (DFS) were used to identify associations between quantitative dimensions and prognosis or response to the addition of paclitaxel. Results were illustrated using Kaplan–Meier curves.

Results

Dimensions PC1 and PC5 were associated with DFS (Cox PH p = 6.7 \(\times\) 10−7 and p = 0.036), remaining significant after correction for standard clinical–pathological prognostic characteristics. Both dimensions were selected in the optimal multivariable model, together with nodal status and tumor size (Cox PH p = 1.4 \(\times\) 10−12). Interactions with treatment were identified for PC3 and PC4. Response to paclitaxel was restricted to tumors with low PC3 and PC4 (log-rank p = 0.0021). Women with tumors high for PC3 or PC4 showed no survival advantage.

Conclusions

Our proof-of-concept application of quantitative dimensions illustrated novel findings and clinical utility beyond standard clinical–pathological characteristics and categorical intrinsic subtypes for prognosis and predicting chemotherapy response. Consideration of expression data as quantitative tumor dimensions offers new potential to identify clinically important patient subsets in clinical trials and advance precision medicine.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas N (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas N (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sestak I, Buus R, Cuzick J et al (2018) Comparison of the performance of 6 prognostic signatures for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4(4):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sestak I, Buus R, Cuzick J et al (2018) Comparison of the performance of 6 prognostic signatures for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4(4):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752CrossRefPubMed Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genome 7:96CrossRef Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genome 7:96CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E et al (2013) Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 31(22):2783–2790CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E et al (2013) Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 31(22):2783–2790CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Filipits M, Nielsen TO, Rudas M et al (2014) The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 20(5):1298–1305CrossRefPubMed Filipits M, Nielsen TO, Rudas M et al (2014) The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 20(5):1298–1305CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cheang MC, Voduc KD, Tu D et al (2012) Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res 18(8):2402–2412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheang MC, Voduc KD, Tu D et al (2012) Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res 18(8):2402–2412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG et al (2007) HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(15):1496–1506CrossRefPubMed Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG et al (2007) HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(15):1496–1506CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference De Laurentiis M, Cancello G, D’Agostino D et al (2008) Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(1):44–53CrossRefPubMed De Laurentiis M, Cancello G, D’Agostino D et al (2008) Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(1):44–53CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nowak AK, Wilcken NR, Stockler MR et al (2004) Systematic review of taxane-containing versus non-taxane-containing regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 5(6):372–380CrossRefPubMed Nowak AK, Wilcken NR, Stockler MR et al (2004) Systematic review of taxane-containing versus non-taxane-containing regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 5(6):372–380CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Martin M, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ruiz A et al (2008) Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by Paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(11):805–814CrossRefPubMed Martin M, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ruiz A et al (2008) Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by Paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(11):805–814CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bria E, Nistico C, Cuppone F et al (2006) Benefit of taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: pooled analysis of 15,500 patients. Cancer 106(11):2337–2344CrossRefPubMed Bria E, Nistico C, Cuppone F et al (2006) Benefit of taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: pooled analysis of 15,500 patients. Cancer 106(11):2337–2344CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Peto R, Davies C et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;379(9814):432–444CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Peto R, Davies C et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;379(9814):432–444CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Martin M, Prat A, Rodriguez-Lescure A et al (2013) PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138(2):457–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin M, Prat A, Rodriguez-Lescure A et al (2013) PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138(2):457–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Bastien RR, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ebbert MT et al (2012) PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers. BMC Med Genomics 5:44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bastien RR, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ebbert MT et al (2012) PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers. BMC Med Genomics 5:44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Caan B, Sternfeld B, Gunderson E et al (2005) Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study: a cohort of early stage breast cancer survivors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 16(5):545–556CrossRefPubMed Caan B, Sternfeld B, Gunderson E et al (2005) Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study: a cohort of early stage breast cancer survivors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 16(5):545–556CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kwan ML, Ambrosone CB, Lee MM et al (2008) The pathways study: a prospective study of breast cancer survivorship within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Cancer Causes Control 19(10):1065–1076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwan ML, Ambrosone CB, Lee MM et al (2008) The pathways study: a prospective study of breast cancer survivorship within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Cancer Causes Control 19(10):1065–1076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Martin M, Brase JC, Ruiz A et al (2016) Prognostic ability of EndoPredict compared to research-based versions of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) scores in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer. A GEICAM/9906 sub-study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156(1):81–89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin M, Brase JC, Ruiz A et al (2016) Prognostic ability of EndoPredict compared to research-based versions of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) scores in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer. A GEICAM/9906 sub-study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156(1):81–89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Volinsky CT, Raftery AE (2000) Bayesian information criterion for censored survival models. Biometrics 56(1):256–262CrossRefPubMed Volinsky CT, Raftery AE (2000) Bayesian information criterion for censored survival models. Biometrics 56(1):256–262CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W et al (2005) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9067–9072CrossRefPubMed McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W et al (2005) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9067–9072CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Re-interpretation of PAM50 gene expression as quantitative tumor dimensions shows utility for clinical trials: application to prognosis and response to paclitaxel in breast cancer
Authors
Nicola J. Camp
Michael J. Madsen
Jesús Herranz
Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
Amparo Ruiz
Miguel Martín
Philip S. Bernard
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05097-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine