Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

01-08-2019 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

Phase III evaluating the addition of fulvestrant (F) to anastrozole (A) as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer (EBC): results from the GEICAM/2006–10 study

Authors: Manuel Ruíz-Borrego, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Begoña Bermejo, Manuel Ramos, Josefina Cruz, Jose Manuel Baena-Cañada, Beatriz Cirauqui, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Emilio Alba, Noelia Martínez-Jáñez, Montserrat Muñoz, Silvia Antolín, Isabel Álvarez, Sonia Del Barco, Elena Sevillano, José Ignacio Chacón, Antonio Antón, María José Escudero, Victoria Ruiz, Eva Carrasco, Miguel Martín, GEICAM

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

GEICAM/2006–10 compared anastrozole (A) versus fulvestrant plus anastrozole (A + F) to test the hypothesis of whether a complete oestrogen blockade is superior to aromatase inhibitors alone in breast cancer patients receiving hormone adjuvant therapy.

Methods

Multicenter, open label, phase III study. HR+/HER2− EBC postmenopausal patients were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant A (5 years [year]) or A + F (A plus F 250 mg/4 weeks for 3 year followed by 2 year of A). Stratification factors: prior chemotherapy (yes/no); number of positive lymph nodes (0/1–3/≥ 4); HR status (both positive/one positive) and site. Primary objective: disease-free survival (DFS). Planned sample size: 2852 patients.

Results

The study has an early stop due to the financer decision with 870 patients (437 randomized to A and 433 to A + F). Patient characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow-up of 6.24y and 111 DFS events (62 in A and 49 in A + F) the Hazard Ratio for DFS (combination vs. anastrozole) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.58–1.22; p = 0.352). The proportion of patients disease-free in arms A and A + F at 5 year and 7 year were 90.8% versus 91% and 83.6% versus 86.7%, respectively. Most relevant G2-4 toxicities (≥ 5% in either arm) with A versus A + F were joint pain (14.7%; 13.7%), fatigue (2.5%; 7.2%), bone pain (3%; 6.5%), hot flushes (3.5%; 5%) and muscle pain (2.8%; 5.1%).

Conclusions

The GEICAM/2006–10 study did not show a statistically significant increase in DFS by adding adjuvant F to A, though no firm conclusions can be drawn because of the limited sample size due to the early stop of the trial. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00543127.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2015) Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 386:1341–1352CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2015) Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 386:1341–1352CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3784–3796CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3784–3796CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al (2015) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26(Suppl 5):v8–30CrossRefPubMed Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al (2015) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26(Suppl 5):v8–30CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E et al (2016) Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388:2997–3005CrossRefPubMed Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E et al (2016) Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388:2997–3005CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bergh J, Jonsson PE, Lidbrink EK et al (2012) FACT: an open-label randomized phase III study of fulvestrant and anastrozole in combination compared with anastrozole alone as first-line therapy for patients with receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1919–1925CrossRefPubMed Bergh J, Jonsson PE, Lidbrink EK et al (2012) FACT: an open-label randomized phase III study of fulvestrant and anastrozole in combination compared with anastrozole alone as first-line therapy for patients with receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1919–1925CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Robertson JF, Dixon JM, Sibbering DM et al (2013) A randomized trial to assess the biological activity of short-term (pre-surgical) fulvestrant 500 mg plus anastrozole versus fulvestrant 500 mg alone or anastrozole alone on primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robertson JF, Dixon JM, Sibbering DM et al (2013) A randomized trial to assess the biological activity of short-term (pre-surgical) fulvestrant 500 mg plus anastrozole versus fulvestrant 500 mg alone or anastrozole alone on primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) (2006) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) (2006)
12.
go back to reference Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L et al (2010) Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4594–4600CrossRefPubMed Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L et al (2010) Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4594–4600CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L et al (2014) Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:djt337CrossRefPubMed Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L et al (2014) Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:djt337CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fernandez SV, Russo J (2010) Estrogen and xenoestrogens in breast cancer. Toxicol Pathol 38:110–122CrossRefPubMed Fernandez SV, Russo J (2010) Estrogen and xenoestrogens in breast cancer. Toxicol Pathol 38:110–122CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sestak I, Dowsett M, Zabaglo L et al (2013) Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1504–1511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sestak I, Dowsett M, Zabaglo L et al (2013) Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1504–1511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Negrouk A, Lacombe D, Cardoso F et al (2017) Safeguarding the future of independent, academic clinical cancer research in Europe for the benefit of patients. ESMO Open 2:e000187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Negrouk A, Lacombe D, Cardoso F et al (2017) Safeguarding the future of independent, academic clinical cancer research in Europe for the benefit of patients. ESMO Open 2:e000187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Phase III evaluating the addition of fulvestrant (F) to anastrozole (A) as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer (EBC): results from the GEICAM/2006–10 study
Authors
Manuel Ruíz-Borrego
Angel Guerrero-Zotano
Begoña Bermejo
Manuel Ramos
Josefina Cruz
Jose Manuel Baena-Cañada
Beatriz Cirauqui
Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
Emilio Alba
Noelia Martínez-Jáñez
Montserrat Muñoz
Silvia Antolín
Isabel Álvarez
Sonia Del Barco
Elena Sevillano
José Ignacio Chacón
Antonio Antón
María José Escudero
Victoria Ruiz
Eva Carrasco
Miguel Martín
GEICAM
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05296-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine