Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Breast Cancer | Methodology

Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software

Authors: Sevgi Kurt, Ahmet Serkan İlgün, Enver Özkurt, Gürsel Soybir, Gül Alço, Çağlar Ünal, Filiz Elbüken Çelebi, Tomris Duymaz, Tuğba Kayan Tapan, Naziye Ak, Çetin Ordu, Vahit Özmen

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery remains a priority for breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to compare the cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgery, mini-LDF (latissimus dorsi flap), and immediate implant reconstruction using both the Japanese scale and the BCCT.core (The Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results software) program and to validate this program.

Patients and methods

Patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer between 1997 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into three groups: 1-those who had undergone breast-conserving surgery (245 patients, 71.3%), 2-those who had undergone mini-LDF after lumpectomy (38 patients, 11.02%), and 3- those who underwent reconstruction with implants after nipple-sparing mastectomy (61 patients, 17.68%). The patients were called for a follow-up examination, and their photos were taken. The photographs were shown to an independent breast surgeon and a plastic surgeon who was not included in the surgeries, and they were asked to evaluate and rate them according to the Japanese cosmetic evaluation scale. The same images were transferred to the computer and scored using BCCT.core.

Results

The plastic and breast surgeon evaluation results showed no significant difference between the three cosmetic techniques (p = 0.99, 0.98).
The results of BCCT.core software measurements were similar to the results of plastic and breast surgeons (p: 0.43).

Conclusion

Patients are more knowledgeable about cosmetic outcomes and expect more objective data. In this study, we used 3 different cosmetic evaluation scales. We found that these techniques give results that are compatible with each other in terms of evaluating the work done in a more concrete way. For this reason, we recommend the use of such software, which offers objective results in a subjective field such as aesthetics and is very easy to apply.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ozmen V, Ozmen T, True V. Breast cancer in Turkey: analysis of 20,000 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2019;15(3):141-6. Ozmen V, Ozmen T, True V. Breast cancer in Turkey: analysis of 20,000 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2019;15(3):141-6.
2.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.
3.
go back to reference Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:445–53.CrossRefPubMed Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:445–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference South Australian Cancer Registry Publications: Epidemiology of Cancer in South Australia- Incidence, Mortality and Survival 1977 to 1999- 23 years of data, South Australian Government 2000. South Australian Cancer Registry Publications: Epidemiology of Cancer in South Australia- Incidence, Mortality and Survival 1977 to 1999- 23 years of data, South Australian Government 2000.
5.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kissane DW, Clarke DM, Ikin J, et al. Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early stage breast cancer: Across-sectional survey. Med J Aust. 1998;169:192–6.CrossRefPubMed Kissane DW, Clarke DM, Ikin J, et al. Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early stage breast cancer: Across-sectional survey. Med J Aust. 1998;169:192–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of young women with breast cancer: A prospective study. Cancer. 2001;92:1288–98.CrossRefPubMed Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of young women with breast cancer: A prospective study. Cancer. 2001;92:1288–98.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;17:747–53. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;17:747–53.
9.
go back to reference Walstra CJEF, Schipper RJ, Poodt IGM, et al. Repeat breast-conserving therapy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1317–27.CrossRefPubMed Walstra CJEF, Schipper RJ, Poodt IGM, et al. Repeat breast-conserving therapy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1317–27.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N, et al. Turning subjective into objective: The BCCT.core software for evaluation od cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast. 2007;16(5):456–61.CrossRefPubMed Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N, et al. Turning subjective into objective: The BCCT.core software for evaluation od cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast. 2007;16(5):456–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hart A, Doyle K, Losken A, et al. Nipple malposition after bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant based reconstruction: Objective postoperative analysis utilizing BCCT.core computer software. Breast J. 2020;26(7):1270-75. Hart A, Doyle K, Losken A, et al. Nipple malposition after bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant based reconstruction: Objective postoperative analysis utilizing BCCT.core computer software. Breast J. 2020;26(7):1270-75.
13.
go back to reference Ozmen V, Ilgun S, Özden BÇ, et al. Comparison of breast cancer patients who underwent partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (M+I) related quality of life (QOL), cosmetic outcome and survival rates. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18(1):87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozmen V, Ilgun S, Özden BÇ, et al. Comparison of breast cancer patients who underwent partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (M+I) related quality of life (QOL), cosmetic outcome and survival rates. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18(1):87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Trakis S, Lord H, Graham P, Fernandez R. Reliability of the BCCT.Core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis- A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65(6):817–25.CrossRefPubMed Trakis S, Lord H, Graham P, Fernandez R. Reliability of the BCCT.Core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis- A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65(6):817–25.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sawai K, Nakajima H, Ichihara S, et al. Reaserch of cosmetic evaluation and extent of resection for breast conserving surgery. 12th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. 2004;12. Abstract #107–8 Sawai K, Nakajima H, Ichihara S, et al. Reaserch of cosmetic evaluation and extent of resection for breast conserving surgery. 12th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. 2004;12. Abstract #107–8
17.
go back to reference Nohara Y, Hanamura N, Zaha H, et al. Cosmetic evaluation methods adapted to asian patients after breast-conserving surgery and examination of the necessarily elements for cosmetic evaluation. J Breast Cancer. 2015;18(1):80–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nohara Y, Hanamura N, Zaha H, et al. Cosmetic evaluation methods adapted to asian patients after breast-conserving surgery and examination of the necessarily elements for cosmetic evaluation. J Breast Cancer. 2015;18(1):80–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Yu T, Eom KY, Jang NY, et al. Objective measurement of cosmetic outcomes os breast conserving therapy using BCCTcore. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):491–8.CrossRefPubMed Yu T, Eom KY, Jang NY, et al. Objective measurement of cosmetic outcomes os breast conserving therapy using BCCTcore. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):491–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software
Authors
Sevgi Kurt
Ahmet Serkan İlgün
Enver Özkurt
Gürsel Soybir
Gül Alço
Çağlar Ünal
Filiz Elbüken Çelebi
Tomris Duymaz
Tuğba Kayan Tapan
Naziye Ak
Çetin Ordu
Vahit Özmen
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03343-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024 Go to the issue