Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2021

01-11-2021 | Breast Cancer | Epidemiology

Multilevel predictors of guideline concordant needle biopsy use for non-metastatic breast cancer

Authors: Anja Zgodic, Jan M. Eberth, Benjamin D. Smith, Whitney E. Zahnd, Swann A. Adams, Brian P. McKinley, Ronnie D. Horner, Mark A. O’Rourke, Dawn W. Blackhurst, Matthew F. Hudson

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Persistent breast cancer disparities, particularly geographic disparities, may be explained by diagnostic practice patterns such as utilization of needle biopsy, a National Quality Forum-endorsed quality metric for breast cancer diagnosis. Our objective was to assess the relationship between patient- and facility-level factors and needle biopsy receipt among women with non-metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

Methods

We examined characteristics of women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015 in the National Cancer Database. We assessed the relationship between patient- (e.g., race/ethnicity, stage, age, rurality) and facility-level (e.g., facility type, breast cancer case volume) factors with needle biopsy utilization via a mixed effects logistic regression model controlling for clustering by facility.

Results

In our cohort of 992,209 patients, 82.96% received needle biopsy. In adjusted models, the odds of needle biopsy receipt were higher for Hispanic (OR 1.04, Confidence Interval 1.01–1.08) and Medicaid patients (OR 1.04, CI 1.02–1.08), and for patients receiving care at Integrated Network Cancer Programs (OR 1.21, CI 1.02–1.43). Odds of needle biopsy receipt were lower for non-metropolitan patients (OR 0.93, CI 0.90–0.96), patients with cancer stage 0 or I (at least OR 0.89, CI 0.86–0.91), patients with comorbidities (OR 0.93, CI 0.91–0.94), and for patients receiving care at Community Cancer Programs (OR 0.84, CI 0.74–0.96).

Conclusion

This study suggests a need to account for sociodemographic factors including rurality as predictors of utilization of evidence-based diagnostic testing, such as needle biopsy. Addressing inequities in breast cancer diagnosis quality may help improve breast cancer outcomes in underserved patients.
Literature
3.
go back to reference National Quality Forum (2009) National voluntary consensus standards for quality of cancer care. Nat Qual Forum 31:C18–C26 National Quality Forum (2009) National voluntary consensus standards for quality of cancer care. Nat Qual Forum 31:C18–C26
6.
go back to reference Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, Parker C, Kuerer H, Shaitelman S (2015) Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150(8):778–786CrossRef Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, Parker C, Kuerer H, Shaitelman S (2015) Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150(8):778–786CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Calhoun K, Anderson B (2014) Needle biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis: a quality metric for breast surgical practice. J Clin Oncol 32(21):2191–2192CrossRef Calhoun K, Anderson B (2014) Needle biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis: a quality metric for breast surgical practice. J Clin Oncol 32(21):2191–2192CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khang L, Adams S, Stec S, Zhang J, Xirasagar S, Daguise V (2017) Travel distance to screening facilities and completion of abnormal mammographic follow-up among disadvantaged women. Ann Epidemiol 27(1):35–41CrossRef Khang L, Adams S, Stec S, Zhang J, Xirasagar S, Daguise V (2017) Travel distance to screening facilities and completion of abnormal mammographic follow-up among disadvantaged women. Ann Epidemiol 27(1):35–41CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eberth J, Xu Y, Smith G, Shen Y, Jiang J, Buchholz T (2014) Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study. J Clin Oncol 32(21):2206–2216CrossRef Eberth J, Xu Y, Smith G, Shen Y, Jiang J, Buchholz T (2014) Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study. J Clin Oncol 32(21):2206–2216CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dreyer M, Nattinger A, McGinley E, Pezzin L (2018) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(1):1–8CrossRef Dreyer M, Nattinger A, McGinley E, Pezzin L (2018) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(1):1–8CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sprague B, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon R, Ramchandani R, Hampton J, Robert S (2011) Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer 117(1):1542–1551CrossRef Sprague B, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon R, Ramchandani R, Hampton J, Robert S (2011) Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer 117(1):1542–1551CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Markossian T, Hines R (2012) Disparities in late stage diagnosis, treatment, and breast cancer-related death by race, age, and rural residence among women in Georgia. Women Health 52(4):2187–2335CrossRef Markossian T, Hines R (2012) Disparities in late stage diagnosis, treatment, and breast cancer-related death by race, age, and rural residence among women in Georgia. Women Health 52(4):2187–2335CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams R, Yao K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Turk M, Gorchow A (2011) Needle versus excisional biopsy for noninvasive and invasive breast cancer: report from the national cancer data base, 2003–2008. Ann Surg Oncol 18(13):3802–3810CrossRef Williams R, Yao K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Turk M, Gorchow A (2011) Needle versus excisional biopsy for noninvasive and invasive breast cancer: report from the national cancer data base, 2003–2008. Ann Surg Oncol 18(13):3802–3810CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lin C, Virgo K, Robbins A, Jemal A, Ward E (2016) Comparison of comorbid medical conditions in the national cancer database and the SEER-medicare database. Ann Surg Oncol 23(13):4139–4148CrossRef Lin C, Virgo K, Robbins A, Jemal A, Ward E (2016) Comparison of comorbid medical conditions in the national cancer database and the SEER-medicare database. Ann Surg Oncol 23(13):4139–4148CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wong M, McMurry T, Schumacher J, Hu C-Y, Stukenborg GJ, Francescatti AB, Greenberg CC, Chang GJ, McKellar DP, Walter LC, Kozower BD (2018) Comorbidity assessment in the national cancer database for patients with surgically resected breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. J Oncol Pract 14(10):e631–e643CrossRef Wong M, McMurry T, Schumacher J, Hu C-Y, Stukenborg GJ, Francescatti AB, Greenberg CC, Chang GJ, McKellar DP, Walter LC, Kozower BD (2018) Comorbidity assessment in the national cancer database for patients with surgically resected breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. J Oncol Pract 14(10):e631–e643CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schootman M, Myers-Geadelmann J, Fuortes L (2020) Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results. J Am Board Fam Pract 13(2):94–100CrossRef Schootman M, Myers-Geadelmann J, Fuortes L (2020) Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results. J Am Board Fam Pract 13(2):94–100CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bhatt A, Whaley D, Lee C (2020) Ultrasouns-guided breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 9999:1–17 Bhatt A, Whaley D, Lee C (2020) Ultrasouns-guided breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 9999:1–17
30.
go back to reference Wu J, Kong R, Tian S, Li H, Liu J, Xu Z, Zou B, Wu K, Kong L (2021) Advances in ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Ultrasound Med Biol 47(5):1172–1181CrossRef Wu J, Kong R, Tian S, Li H, Liu J, Xu Z, Zou B, Wu K, Kong L (2021) Advances in ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Ultrasound Med Biol 47(5):1172–1181CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nicosia L, Bozzini A, Addante F, Renne G, Latronico A, Meneghetti L, Pala O, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Cassano E, Mastropasqua MG (2021) Wireless ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience in clinical practice at European institute of oncology. Breast J 27:514–520CrossRef Nicosia L, Bozzini A, Addante F, Renne G, Latronico A, Meneghetti L, Pala O, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Cassano E, Mastropasqua MG (2021) Wireless ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience in clinical practice at European institute of oncology. Breast J 27:514–520CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Miller ME, Bleicher RJ, Kaufman CS, Kurtzman SH, Chang C, Wang C-H, Pollitt KA, Connolly J, Winchester DP, Yao KA (2019) Impact of breast center accreditation on compliance with breast quality performance measures at commission on cancer-accredited centers. Ann Surg Oncol 26(5):1202–1211CrossRef Miller ME, Bleicher RJ, Kaufman CS, Kurtzman SH, Chang C, Wang C-H, Pollitt KA, Connolly J, Winchester DP, Yao KA (2019) Impact of breast center accreditation on compliance with breast quality performance measures at commission on cancer-accredited centers. Ann Surg Oncol 26(5):1202–1211CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bilimoria K, Bentrem D, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C (2009) Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the national cancer data base. J Clin Oncol 27(25):4177–4181CrossRef Bilimoria K, Bentrem D, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C (2009) Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the national cancer data base. J Clin Oncol 27(25):4177–4181CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multilevel predictors of guideline concordant needle biopsy use for non-metastatic breast cancer
Authors
Anja Zgodic
Jan M. Eberth
Benjamin D. Smith
Whitney E. Zahnd
Swann A. Adams
Brian P. McKinley
Ronnie D. Horner
Mark A. O’Rourke
Dawn W. Blackhurst
Matthew F. Hudson
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06352-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine