Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

01-07-2019 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

Multigene panel testing in unselected Israeli breast cancer cases: mutational spectrum and use of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction algorithms

Authors: Rinat Bernstein-Molho, Amihood Singer, Yael Laitman, Iris Netzer, Shelley Zalmanoviz, Eitan Friedman

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Studies assessing the contribution of non-BRCA1/2 gene mutations to inherited breast cancer (BC) predisposition consistently reported low (up to 4%) yield. The current study aimed at assessing the spectrum of non-BRCA mutations in unselected Israeli BC cases and the utility of BRCAPRO and Penn II models, as tools for prediction of detecting non-BRCA1/2 mutations in Israeli BC patients who tested negative for the predominant Jewish BRCA1/2 mutations.

Methods

All consecutive Jewish Israeli BC patients at the Sheba Medical center who tested negative for the predominant BRCA1/2 mutations and elected to perform multigene panel testing were included. For each patient probability of BRCA mutation detection was calculated by the Penn II algorithm and the BRCAPRO tool.

Results

Overall, 144 cases were included (median age at diagnosis was 48, range 20–73 years); 48% were Ashkenazim. One patient harbored a non-founder BRCA1 mutation (c.5434C>G; p.P1812A). Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations in non-BRCA1/2 genes were detected in additional 14/144 patients, including CHEK2 (n = 5), RAD51D (n = 2), MSH6 (n = 2), and one each in ATM, RET, TP53, NBN, and BAP1. Using a cutoff of 15% probability of BRCA mutation detection, both models accurately predicted the observed carrier rate of non-BRCA mutations.

Conclusions

In unselected Jewish Israeli BC patients, the rate of detecting non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations is low, with CHEK2 mutations detected in 3.4% of cases. BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models may be utilized for selecting patients eligible for further multigene panel testing after exclusion of predominant BRCA1/2 mutations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology, Committee on Genetics, Society of Gynecologic Oncology (2017) Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2130(3):e110–e126 Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology, Committee on Genetics, Society of Gynecologic Oncology (2017) Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2130(3):e110–e126
4.
go back to reference Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lee AJ, Cunningham AP, Kuchenbaecker KB, Mavaddat N, Easton DF, Antoniou AC (2014) BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface. Br J Cancer 110:535–545CrossRefPubMed Lee AJ, Cunningham AP, Kuchenbaecker KB, Mavaddat N, Easton DF, Antoniou AC (2014) BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface. Br J Cancer 110:535–545CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23:1111–1130CrossRefPubMed Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23:1111–1130CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cintolo-Gonzalez JA, Braun D, Blackford AL, Mazzola E, Acar A, Plichta JK et al (2017) Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:263–284CrossRefPubMed Cintolo-Gonzalez JA, Braun D, Blackford AL, Mazzola E, Acar A, Plichta JK et al (2017) Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:263–284CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barnes-Kedar I, Bernstein-Molho R, Ginzach N, Hartmajer S, Shapira T, Magal N et al (2018) The yield of full BRCA1/2 genotyping in Israeli high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients who do not carry the predominant mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 172:151–157CrossRefPubMed Barnes-Kedar I, Bernstein-Molho R, Ginzach N, Hartmajer S, Shapira T, Magal N et al (2018) The yield of full BRCA1/2 genotyping in Israeli high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients who do not carry the predominant mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 172:151–157CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Janavičius R (2010) Founder BRCA1/2 mutations in the Europe: implications for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer prevention and control. EPMA J 1:397–412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janavičius R (2010) Founder BRCA1/2 mutations in the Europe: implications for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer prevention and control. EPMA J 1:397–412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bernstein-Molho R, Laitman Y, Schayek H, Reish O, Lotan S, Haim S et al (2018) The yield of targeted genotyping for the recurring mutations in BRCA1/2 in Israel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167:697–702CrossRefPubMed Bernstein-Molho R, Laitman Y, Schayek H, Reish O, Lotan S, Haim S et al (2018) The yield of targeted genotyping for the recurring mutations in BRCA1/2 in Israel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167:697–702CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Petrucelli N, Mange S, Fulbright JL, Dohany L, Zakalik D, Duquette D (2015) To reflex or not: additional BRCA1/2 testing in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals without founder mutations. J Genet Couns 24:285–293CrossRefPubMed Petrucelli N, Mange S, Fulbright JL, Dohany L, Zakalik D, Duquette D (2015) To reflex or not: additional BRCA1/2 testing in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals without founder mutations. J Genet Couns 24:285–293CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Walsh T, Mandell JB, Norquist BM, Casadei S, Gulsuner S, Lee MK et al (2017) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer due to mutations other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder alleles among Ashkenazi Jewish women. JAMA Oncol 3:1647–1653CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walsh T, Mandell JB, Norquist BM, Casadei S, Gulsuner S, Lee MK et al (2017) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer due to mutations other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder alleles among Ashkenazi Jewish women. JAMA Oncol 3:1647–1653CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Tung N, Lin NU, Kidd J, Allen BA, Singh N, Wenstrup RJ et al (2016) Frequency of germline mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a sequential series of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:1460–1468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tung N, Lin NU, Kidd J, Allen BA, Singh N, Wenstrup RJ et al (2016) Frequency of germline mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a sequential series of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:1460–1468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Saam J, Arnell C, Theisen A, Moyes K, Marino I, Roundy KM et al (2015) Patients tested at a laboratory for hereditary cancer syndromes show an overlap for multiple syndromes in their personal and familial cancer histories. Oncology 89:288–293CrossRefPubMed Saam J, Arnell C, Theisen A, Moyes K, Marino I, Roundy KM et al (2015) Patients tested at a laboratory for hereditary cancer syndromes show an overlap for multiple syndromes in their personal and familial cancer histories. Oncology 89:288–293CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Espenschied CR, LaDuca H, Li S, McFarland R, Gau C-L, Hampel H (2017) Multigene panel testing provides a new perspective on lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 35:2568–2575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Espenschied CR, LaDuca H, Li S, McFarland R, Gau C-L, Hampel H (2017) Multigene panel testing provides a new perspective on lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 35:2568–2575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Berry DA, Iversen ES, Gudbjartsson DF, Hiller EH, Garber JE, Peshkin BN et al (2002) BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol 20:2701–2712CrossRefPubMed Berry DA, Iversen ES, Gudbjartsson DF, Hiller EH, Garber JE, Peshkin BN et al (2002) BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol 20:2701–2712CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Foulkes WD, Knoppers BM, Turnbull C (2016) Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13:41–54CrossRefPubMed Foulkes WD, Knoppers BM, Turnbull C (2016) Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13:41–54CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vysotskaia VS, Hogan GJ, Gould GM, Wang X, Robertson AD, Haas KR et al (2017) Development and validation of a 36-gene sequencing assay for hereditary cancer risk assessment. PeerJ 5:e3046CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vysotskaia VS, Hogan GJ, Gould GM, Wang X, Robertson AD, Haas KR et al (2017) Development and validation of a 36-gene sequencing assay for hereditary cancer risk assessment. PeerJ 5:e3046CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Lincoln SE, Kobayashi Y, Anderson MJ, Yang S, Desmond AJ, Mills MA et al (2015) A systematic comparison of traditional and multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes in more than 1000 patients. J Mol Diagn 17(5):533–544CrossRefPubMed Lincoln SE, Kobayashi Y, Anderson MJ, Yang S, Desmond AJ, Mills MA et al (2015) A systematic comparison of traditional and multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes in more than 1000 patients. J Mol Diagn 17(5):533–544CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Woodage T, King SM, Wacholder S, Hartge P, Struewing JP, McAdams M et al (1998) The APC I1307 K allele and cancer risk in a community-based study of Ashkenazi Jews. Nat Genet 20:62–65CrossRefPubMed Woodage T, King SM, Wacholder S, Hartge P, Struewing JP, McAdams M et al (1998) The APC I1307 K allele and cancer risk in a community-based study of Ashkenazi Jews. Nat Genet 20:62–65CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brugières L, Pagès S, Feunteun J et al (2001) Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53germline mutation screening. J Med Genet 38:43–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brugières L, Pagès S, Feunteun J et al (2001) Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53germline mutation screening. J Med Genet 38:43–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Yablonski-Peretz T, Paluch-Shimon S, Gutman LS, Kaplan Y, Dvir A, Barnes-Kedar I et al (2016) Screening for germline mutations in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in high-risk families in Israel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155:133–138CrossRefPubMed Yablonski-Peretz T, Paluch-Shimon S, Gutman LS, Kaplan Y, Dvir A, Barnes-Kedar I et al (2016) Screening for germline mutations in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in high-risk families in Israel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155:133–138CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Daly MB, Pilarski R, Berry M, Buys SS, Farmer M, Friedman S et al (2017) NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:9–20CrossRefPubMed Daly MB, Pilarski R, Berry M, Buys SS, Farmer M, Friedman S et al (2017) NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:9–20CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, Miranda S, Mossop H, Perez-Lopez R et al (2015) DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 373(18):1697–1708CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, Miranda S, Mossop H, Perez-Lopez R et al (2015) DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 373(18):1697–1708CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Manchanda R, Patel S, Gordeev VS, Antoniou AC, Smith S, Lee A et al (2018) Cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 mutation testing in unselected general population women. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 110:714–725CrossRefPubMed Manchanda R, Patel S, Gordeev VS, Antoniou AC, Smith S, Lee A et al (2018) Cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 mutation testing in unselected general population women. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 110:714–725CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S et al (2014) Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(1):379PubMed Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S et al (2014) Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(1):379PubMed
29.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Poll A, Royer R, Llacuachaqui M, Tulman A, Sun P et al (2009) Screening for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in unselected Jewish women. J Clin Oncol 28:387–391CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Poll A, Royer R, Llacuachaqui M, Tulman A, Sun P et al (2009) Screening for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in unselected Jewish women. J Clin Oncol 28:387–391CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lieberman S, Tomer A, Ben-Chetrit A, Olsha O, Strano S, Beeri R et al (2017) Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews: proactive recruitment compared with self-referral. Genet Med 19:754–762CrossRefPubMed Lieberman S, Tomer A, Ben-Chetrit A, Olsha O, Strano S, Beeri R et al (2017) Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews: proactive recruitment compared with self-referral. Genet Med 19:754–762CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, Friedman E, Segev S, Renbaum P et al (2014) Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:14205–14210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, Friedman E, Segev S, Renbaum P et al (2014) Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:14205–14210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Multigene panel testing in unselected Israeli breast cancer cases: mutational spectrum and use of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction algorithms
Authors
Rinat Bernstein-Molho
Amihood Singer
Yael Laitman
Iris Netzer
Shelley Zalmanoviz
Eitan Friedman
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05228-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine