Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Breast Cancer | Breast Oncology

Medical Maximizing–Minimizing Preferences in Relation to Low-Value Services for Older Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Authors: Nicole Mott, BS, Ton Wang, MD, Jacquelyn Miller, MA, Nicholas L. Berlin, MD, MPH, Sarah Hawley, PhD, MPH, Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, PhD, Lesly A. Dossett, MD, MPH

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multiple studies have demonstrated the safety of omitting therapies in older women with breast cancer. Despite de-implementation guidelines, up to 65% of older women continue to receive one or more of these low-value services. Previous work has investigated the role of both provider and patient attitudes as barriers to de-implementation; however, the importance of the patient’s maximizing–minimizing preferences within this context remains unclear.

Methods

In this qualitative study, we conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with women ≥ 70 years of age without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer to elicit perspectives on breast cancer treatment in relation to their medical maximizing–minimizing preferences, as determined by the single-item maximizer–minimizer elicitation question (MM1). We used an interpretive description approach in analysis to produce a thematic survey.

Results

Participants were relatively evenly distributed across the MM1 (minimizer, n = 8; neutral, n = 13; maximizer, n = 9). Despite being told of recommendations allowing for the safe omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy, maximizers consistently stated preferences for more medical intervention and aggressive therapies over minimizers and neutral individuals.

Conclusion

Medical maximizing–minimizing preferences in older women correspond with preferences for breast cancer treatment options that guidelines identify as potentially unnecessary. Increased awareness of patient-level variability in maximizing–minimizing preferences may be valuable in developing optimal intervention strategies to reduce utilization of low-value care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colla CH, Morden NE, Sequist TD, Schpero WL, Rosenthal MB. Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(2):221–28.PubMedCrossRef Colla CH, Morden NE, Sequist TD, Schpero WL, Rosenthal MB. Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(2):221–28.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Groopman JE, Hartzband P. Your medical mind: how to decide what is right for you. New York, NY: Penguin Press; 2011. Groopman JE, Hartzband P. Your medical mind: how to decide what is right for you. New York, NY: Penguin Press; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Scherer LD, Caverly TJ, Burke J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Steinley D, et al. Development of the medical maximizer-minimizer scale. Health Psychol. 2016;35(11):1276–87.PubMedCrossRef Scherer LD, Caverly TJ, Burke J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Steinley D, et al. Development of the medical maximizer-minimizer scale. Health Psychol. 2016;35(11):1276–87.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scherer LD, Shaffer VA, Caverly T, DeWitt J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical maximizing-minimizing predicts patient preferences for high- and low-benefit care. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(1):72–80.PubMedCrossRef Scherer LD, Shaffer VA, Caverly T, DeWitt J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical maximizing-minimizing predicts patient preferences for high- and low-benefit care. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(1):72–80.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Horowitz N, Sanft T, Wilson LD, Silber A, Killelea B, et al. Does lymph node status influence adjuvant therapy decision-making in women 70 years of age or older with clinically node negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):1082–8.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar AB, Horowitz N, Sanft T, Wilson LD, Silber A, Killelea B, et al. Does lymph node status influence adjuvant therapy decision-making in women 70 years of age or older with clinically node negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):1082–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Budman DR, Henderson IC, Citron ML, et al. Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3699–04.PubMedCrossRef Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Budman DR, Henderson IC, Citron ML, et al. Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3699–04.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, Cirrincione CT, Berry DA, McCormick B, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2382–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, Cirrincione CT, Berry DA, McCormick B, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2382–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Haffty BG, Habermann EB, Hoskin TL, Goetz MP. Has the time come to stop surgical staging of the axilla for all women age 70 years or older with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(3):614–7.PubMedCrossRef Boughey JC, Haffty BG, Habermann EB, Hoskin TL, Goetz MP. Has the time come to stop surgical staging of the axilla for all women age 70 years or older with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(3):614–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rhieu BH, Rajagopalan MS, Sukumvanich P, Kelley JL, Ahrendt GM, Heron DE, et al. Patterns of care for omission of radiation therapy for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(4):e267–73.PubMedCrossRef Rhieu BH, Rajagopalan MS, Sukumvanich P, Kelley JL, Ahrendt GM, Heron DE, et al. Patterns of care for omission of radiation therapy for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(4):e267–73.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM, Shubeck SP, Jagsi R, Dossett LA. Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the choosing wisely. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(8):2653–2663.PubMedCrossRef Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM, Shubeck SP, Jagsi R, Dossett LA. Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the choosing wisely. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(8):2653–2663.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shumway DA, Griffith KA, Sabel MS, Jones RD, Forstner JM, Bott-Kothari TL, et al. Surgeon and radiation oncologist views on omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3518–26.PubMedCrossRef Shumway DA, Griffith KA, Sabel MS, Jones RD, Forstner JM, Bott-Kothari TL, et al. Surgeon and radiation oncologist views on omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3518–26.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kullgren JT, Malani P, Kirch M, Singer D, Clark S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of overuse. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(1):365–7.PubMedCrossRef Kullgren JT, Malani P, Kirch M, Singer D, Clark S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of overuse. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(1):365–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Eliciting medical maximizing-minimizing preferences with a single question: development and validation of the MM1. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(4):545–50.PubMedCrossRef Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Eliciting medical maximizing-minimizing preferences with a single question: development and validation of the MM1. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(4):545–50.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Scherer LD, Kullgren JT, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Shaffer VA, Fagerlin A, et al. Medical maximizing-minimizing preferences predict responses to information about prostate-specific antigen screening. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(6):708–18.PubMedCrossRef Scherer LD, Kullgren JT, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Shaffer VA, Fagerlin A, et al. Medical maximizing-minimizing preferences predict responses to information about prostate-specific antigen screening. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(6):708–18.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Evron JM, Reyes-Gastelum D, Banerjee M, Scherer LD, Wallner LP, Hamilton AS, et al. Role of patient maximizing-minimizing preferences in thyroid cancer surveillance. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32):3042–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Evron JM, Reyes-Gastelum D, Banerjee M, Scherer LD, Wallner LP, Hamilton AS, et al. Role of patient maximizing-minimizing preferences in thyroid cancer surveillance. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32):3042–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thorne SE. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef Thorne SE. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(2):169–77.PubMedCrossRef Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(2):169–77.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing. 2000;3(3):68-70.CrossRef Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing. 2000;3(3):68-70.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Averill JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(6):855–66.PubMedCrossRef Averill JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(6):855–66.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(7):905–23.PubMedCrossRef Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(7):905–23.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schleifer D, Rothman DJ. The ultimate decision is yours: exploring patients’ attitudes about the overuse of medical interventions. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52552.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schleifer D, Rothman DJ. The ultimate decision is yours: exploring patients’ attitudes about the overuse of medical interventions. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52552.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):665–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):665–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jagsi R. Debating the oncologist’s role in defining the value of cancer care: we have a duty to society. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4035–8.PubMedCrossRef Jagsi R. Debating the oncologist’s role in defining the value of cancer care: we have a duty to society. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4035–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rice T. The behavioral economics of health and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:431–47.PubMedCrossRef Rice T. The behavioral economics of health and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:431–47.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Swindell JS, McGuire AL, Halpern SD. Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients’ decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(3):260-4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Swindell JS, McGuire AL, Halpern SD. Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients’ decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(3):260-4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bynum JPW, Barre L, Reed C, Passow H. Participation of very old adults in healthcare decisions. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(2):216–30.PubMedCrossRef Bynum JPW, Barre L, Reed C, Passow H. Participation of very old adults in healthcare decisions. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(2):216–30.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Giordano SH, Duan Z, Kuo YF, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS. Use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef Giordano SH, Duan Z, Kuo YF, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS. Use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Medical Maximizing–Minimizing Preferences in Relation to Low-Value Services for Older Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study
Authors
Nicole Mott, BS
Ton Wang, MD
Jacquelyn Miller, MA
Nicholas L. Berlin, MD, MPH
Sarah Hawley, PhD, MPH
Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, PhD
Lesly A. Dossett, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08924-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021 Go to the issue