Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015

Open Access 01-01-2015 | Epidemiology

Breast cancer risk after diagnosis by screening mammography of nonproliferative or proliferative benign breast disease: a study from a population-based screening program

Authors: Xavier Castells, Laia Domingo, Josep María Corominas, Isabel Torá-Rocamora, María Jesús Quintana, Marisa Baré, Carmen Vidal, Carmen Natal, Mar Sánchez, Francina Saladié, Joana Ferrer, Mar Vernet, Sonia Servitja, Ana Rodríguez-Arana, Marta Roman, Josep Alfons Espinàs, María Sala

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Benign breast disease increases the risk of breast cancer. This association has scarcely been evaluated in the context of breast cancer screening programs although it is a prevalent finding in mammography screening. We assessed the association of distinct categories of benign breast disease and subsequent risk of breast cancer, as well as the influence of a family history of breast cancer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 545,171 women aged 50–69 years biennially screened for breast cancer in Spain. The median of follow-up was 6.1 years. The age-adjusted rate ratio (RR) of breast cancer for women with benign breast disease, histologically classified into nonproliferative and proliferative disease with and without atypia, compared with women without benign breast disease was estimated by Poisson regression analysis. A stratified analysis by family history of breast cancer was performed in a subsample. All tests were two-sided. The age-adjusted RR of breast cancer after diagnosis of benign breast disease was 2.51 (95 % CI: 2.14–2.93) compared with women without benign breast disease. The risk was higher in women with proliferative disease with atypia (RR = 4.56, 95 % CI: 2.06–10.07) followed by those with proliferative disease without atypia (RR = 3.58; 95 % CI = 2.61–4.91). Women with nonproliferative disease and without a family history of breast cancer remained also at increased risk of cancer (OR = 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.86–2.68). An increased risk of breast cancer was observed among screening participants with proliferative or nonproliferative benign breast disease, regardless of a family history of breast cancer. This information may be useful to explore risk-based screening strategies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carter CL, Corle DK, Micozzi MS et al (1988) A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol 128:467–477PubMed Carter CL, Corle DK, Micozzi MS et al (1988) A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol 128:467–477PubMed
2.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:229–237PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:229–237PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference London SJ, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ et al (1992) A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 267:941–944PubMedCrossRef London SJ, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ et al (1992) A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 267:941–944PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312:146–151PubMedCrossRef Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312:146–151PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons PL, Henson DE, Hutter RV (1998) Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement. Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122:1053–1055PubMed Fitzgibbons PL, Henson DE, Hutter RV (1998) Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement. Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122:1053–1055PubMed
6.
go back to reference Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW et al (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55:2698–2708PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW et al (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55:2698–2708PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kabat GC, Jones JG, Olson N et al (2010) A multi-center prospective cohort study of benign breast disease and risk of subsequent breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 21:821–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kabat GC, Jones JG, Olson N et al (2010) A multi-center prospective cohort study of benign breast disease and risk of subsequent breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 21:821–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tice JA, O’Meara ES, Weaver DL et al (2013) Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1043–1049PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tice JA, O’Meara ES, Weaver DL et al (2013) Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1043–1049PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wang J, Costantino JP, Tan-Chiu E et al (2004) Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:616–620PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Costantino JP, Tan-Chiu E et al (2004) Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:616–620PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cote ML, Ruterbusch JJ, Alosh B et al (2012) Benign breast disease and the risk of subsequent breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5:1375–1380CrossRef Cote ML, Ruterbusch JJ, Alosh B et al (2012) Benign breast disease and the risk of subsequent breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5:1375–1380CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Perry N (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. In: Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds) 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg Perry N (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. In: Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds) 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
12.
go back to reference Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA et al (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1053–1060PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA et al (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1053–1060PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study. J Clin Oncol 25:2671–2677PubMedCrossRef Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study. J Clin Oncol 25:2671–2677PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ascunce N, Salas D, Zubizarreta R et al (2010) Cancer screening in Spain. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 3):iii43–iii51PubMed Ascunce N, Salas D, Zubizarreta R et al (2010) Cancer screening in Spain. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 3):iii43–iii51PubMed
15.
go back to reference Carter RE, Lipsitz SR, Tilley BC (2005) Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models. Biostatistics 6:39–44PubMedCrossRef Carter RE, Lipsitz SR, Tilley BC (2005) Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models. Biostatistics 6:39–44PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Allred DC, Mohsin SK, Fuqua SA (2001) Histological and biological evolution of human premalignant breast disease. Endocr Relat Cancer 8:47–61PubMedCrossRef Allred DC, Mohsin SK, Fuqua SA (2001) Histological and biological evolution of human premalignant breast disease. Endocr Relat Cancer 8:47–61PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lopez-Garcia MA, Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M et al (2010) Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways. Histopathology 57:171–192PubMedCrossRef Lopez-Garcia MA, Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M et al (2010) Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways. Histopathology 57:171–192PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD et al (2003) Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 361:125–129PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD et al (2003) Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 361:125–129PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Euler-Chelpin M, Kuchiki M, Vejborg I (2014) Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: the role of misclassification. Cancer Epidemiol 38(5):619–622CrossRef Euler-Chelpin M, Kuchiki M, Vejborg I (2014) Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: the role of misclassification. Cancer Epidemiol 38(5):619–622CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shrestha DB, Ravichandran D, Baber Y et al (2009) Follow-up of benign screen-detected breast lesions with suspicious preoperative needle biopsies. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:156–158PubMedCrossRef Shrestha DB, Ravichandran D, Baber Y et al (2009) Follow-up of benign screen-detected breast lesions with suspicious preoperative needle biopsies. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:156–158PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer risk after diagnosis by screening mammography of nonproliferative or proliferative benign breast disease: a study from a population-based screening program
Authors
Xavier Castells
Laia Domingo
Josep María Corominas
Isabel Torá-Rocamora
María Jesús Quintana
Marisa Baré
Carmen Vidal
Carmen Natal
Mar Sánchez
Francina Saladié
Joana Ferrer
Mar Vernet
Sonia Servitja
Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Marta Roman
Josep Alfons Espinàs
María Sala
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3208-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine