Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011

01-02-2011 | Invited Commentary

Breast cancer prognostic markers in the post-genomic era

Authors: Lajos Pusztai, Takayuki Iwamoto

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

Historically, new prognostic markers for breast cancer were assessed separately and sequentially in a series of studies, often with considerable cost and substantial time to complete each subsequent study. Candidate markers were rarely compared with one another head to head since different investigators analyzed different cohorts of patients and used different technologies. The availability of public gene expression data sets that also include pathologic and clinical outcome information on each case has changed prognostic marker research considerably. These databases provide an opportunity to rapidly evaluate almost any mRNA expression-based markers for prognostic and treatment response predictive values in silico [1]. Not only single gene markers but any combinations of genes can be tested and their performance compared with already published mRNA-based outcome predictors. The availability of multiple, prospectively assembled, clinically homogeneous data sets also provide an opportunity for marker optimization in one cohort and independent validation in another. The remarkable ease with which and gene can now be assessed for prognostic value is illustrated by a recently developed web-based tool, which plots Kaplan–Meir survival curves for any of the 22,277 probe sets represented on Affymetrix gene chips [2]. The tool is based on public microarray data from a total of 1,809 breast cancer patients and allows for filtering by hormone receptor status, nodal status and by adjuvant endocrine treatment. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pusztai L, Leyland-Jones B (2008) Promises and caveats of in-silico biomarker discovery. Br J Cancer 99:385–386CrossRefPubMed Pusztai L, Leyland-Jones B (2008) Promises and caveats of in-silico biomarker discovery. Br J Cancer 99:385–386CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gyorffy B, Lanczky A, Eklund AC et al (2010) An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9 Gyorffy B, Lanczky A, Eklund AC et al (2010) An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-009-0674-9
3.
go back to reference Greenbaum D, Colangelo C, Williams K et al. (2003) Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biol 4: 117–117.8 Greenbaum D, Colangelo C, Williams K et al. (2003) Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biol 4: 117–117.8
4.
go back to reference Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R et al (2007) Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 25:117–124CrossRefPubMed Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R et al (2007) Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 25:117–124CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Hasenclever D, Schaeffer M et al (2008) Prognostic effect of epithelial cell adhesion molecule overexpression in untreated node-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:5849–5855CrossRefPubMed Schmidt M, Hasenclever D, Schaeffer M et al (2008) Prognostic effect of epithelial cell adhesion molecule overexpression in untreated node-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:5849–5855CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Andre F, Hatzis C, Anderson K et al (2007) Microtubule-associated protein-tau is a bifunctional predictor of endocrine sensitivity and chemotherapy resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:2061–2067CrossRefPubMed Andre F, Hatzis C, Anderson K et al (2007) Microtubule-associated protein-tau is a bifunctional predictor of endocrine sensitivity and chemotherapy resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:2061–2067CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Iwamoto T, Bianchini G, Coutant C et al (2009) Different biological processes are associated with prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 69(Suppl):864s (Abs 6124)CrossRef Iwamoto T, Bianchini G, Coutant C et al (2009) Different biological processes are associated with prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 69(Suppl):864s (Abs 6124)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Scheulie ME, Dittrich C et al (2010) An open-label, randomized phase II study of adecatumumab, a fully human anti-EpCAM antibody, as monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:275–282CrossRefPubMed Schmidt M, Scheulie ME, Dittrich C et al (2010) An open-label, randomized phase II study of adecatumumab, a fully human anti-EpCAM antibody, as monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:275–282CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1446–1452CrossRefPubMed Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1446–1452CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360:790–800CrossRefPubMed Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360:790–800CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMed Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yu JX, Sieuwerts AM, Zhang Y et al (2007) Pathway analysis of gene signatures predicting metastasis of node-negative primary breast cancer. BMC Genomics 7:182. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-182 Yu JX, Sieuwerts AM, Zhang Y et al (2007) Pathway analysis of gene signatures predicting metastasis of node-negative primary breast cancer. BMC Genomics 7:182. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2407-7-182
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer prognostic markers in the post-genomic era
Authors
Lajos Pusztai
Takayuki Iwamoto
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0932-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine