Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 08-03-2024 | Breast Augmentation | Original Articles

Retrospective Study on Optimizing Breast Augmentation Outcomes in Transgender Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique

Authors: Matilde Tettamanzi, Federico Ziani, Manuela Rodio, Giovanni Arrica, Giovanni Muratore, Anna Manconi, Claudia Trignano, Edoardo Beatrici, Corrado Liperi, Corrado Rubino, Emilio Trignano

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) involves the infusion of a saline solution containing lidocaine and epinephrine into tissues to achieve localized anesthesia and vasoconstriction. While the use of TLA in sub-glandular augmentation mammoplasty has been documented, we present a modified TLA approach for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation in transgender patients based on our experience over the past years.

Methods

Between the years 2014 and 2021, we performed primary sub-muscular breast augmentation on 20 transgender patients under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Initially, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, and subsequently, during the surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle.

Results

The average volume of tumescent solution infiltrated during TLA was 740 mL per breast. There were no reports of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity, and no cases required a conversion to general anesthesia. Patients experienced no pain or discomfort during the preoperative infiltration or surgical procedure.
Reoperations due to short-term complications never occurred. We observed a major complication rate of 5%, represented by 1 hematoma. Long-term complications comprised one case of implant dislocation and one occurrence of dystrophic scar formation. No cases of capsular contracture needing reoperation, asymmetry, and implant rupture occurred. In total, one individual (5%) requested larger implants. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 1 years.

Conclusions

Overall, augmentation mammaplasty is a valuable choice for transgender women aiming to enhance their feminine characteristics and alleviate gender dysphoria. It is imperative for patients to conduct thorough research, grasp the potential pros and cons, and consult experienced healthcare professionals in transgender care. Additionally, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has proven to be a safe and efficient method for sub-muscular breast augmentation, providing effective pain control with minimal postoperative complications, resulting in high patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Selvaggi G, Giordano S (2014) The role of mental health professionals in gender reassignment surgeries: Unjust discrimination or responsible care? Aesth Plast Surg 38:1177e83CrossRef Selvaggi G, Giordano S (2014) The role of mental health professionals in gender reassignment surgeries: Unjust discrimination or responsible care? Aesth Plast Surg 38:1177e83CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gutowski KA (2014) Tumescent analgesia in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4 Suppl 2):50S-57SCrossRefPubMed Gutowski KA (2014) Tumescent analgesia in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4 Suppl 2):50S-57SCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rusciani A, Pietramaggiori G, Troccola A, Santoprete S, Rotondo A, Curinga G (2015) The outcome of primary subglandular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Ann Plast Surg 76:13–17CrossRef Rusciani A, Pietramaggiori G, Troccola A, Santoprete S, Rotondo A, Curinga G (2015) The outcome of primary subglandular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Ann Plast Surg 76:13–17CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Peled IJ (2002) Tumescence in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1366–1367):13 Peled IJ (2002) Tumescence in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1366–1367):13
7.
go back to reference Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(5):1119–1123 (discussion 1124)CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(5):1119–1123 (discussion 1124)CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chung KJ, Cha KH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim TG, Kim IG (2012) Usefulness of intravenous anesthesia using a targetcontrolled infusion system with local anesthesia in submuscular breast augmentation surgery. Arch Plast Surg 39:540–545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chung KJ, Cha KH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim TG, Kim IG (2012) Usefulness of intravenous anesthesia using a targetcontrolled infusion system with local anesthesia in submuscular breast augmentation surgery. Arch Plast Surg 39:540–545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Jost U, Dorsing C, Jahr C et al (1997) Propofol and postoperative nausea and/or vomiting. Anaesthesist 46:776–782CrossRefPubMed Jost U, Dorsing C, Jahr C et al (1997) Propofol and postoperative nausea and/or vomiting. Anaesthesist 46:776–782CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R et al (2004) Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 98:632–641CrossRefPubMed Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R et al (2004) Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 98:632–641CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Eldor L, Weissman A, Fodor L et al (2008) Breast augmentation under general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 61:243Y246CrossRef Eldor L, Weissman A, Fodor L et al (2008) Breast augmentation under general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 61:243Y246CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C et al (1999) Cost analysis of target controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 88:77–82PubMed Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C et al (1999) Cost analysis of target controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 88:77–82PubMed
15.
go back to reference Fombeur PO, Tilleul PR, Beaussier MJ et al (2002) Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane. Am J Health Syst Pharm 59:1344–1350CrossRefPubMed Fombeur PO, Tilleul PR, Beaussier MJ et al (2002) Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane. Am J Health Syst Pharm 59:1344–1350CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jabs D, Richards BG, Richards FD (2008) Quantitative effects of tumescent infiltration and bupivicaine injection in decreasing postoperative pain in submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 28:528Y533CrossRef Jabs D, Richards BG, Richards FD (2008) Quantitative effects of tumescent infiltration and bupivicaine injection in decreasing postoperative pain in submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 28:528Y533CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermal Surg Oncol 16:248Y263 Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermal Surg Oncol 16:248Y263
18.
go back to reference Klein JA (1988) Anesthesia for liposuction in dermatologic surgery. J Dermal Surg Oncol 14:1124Y1132 Klein JA (1988) Anesthesia for liposuction in dermatologic surgery. J Dermal Surg Oncol 14:1124Y1132
22.
go back to reference Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2009) Chapter 57: Breast reconstruction. In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech DS, Walden JL (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2009) Chapter 57: Breast reconstruction. In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech DS, Walden JL (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia
23.
go back to reference Namias A, Kaplan B (1998) Tumescent anesthesia for dermatologic surgery. Cosmetic noncosmetic procedures. Dermatol Surg 24:755Y758CrossRef Namias A, Kaplan B (1998) Tumescent anesthesia for dermatologic surgery. Cosmetic noncosmetic procedures. Dermatol Surg 24:755Y758CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesth Plast Surg 31:532–539CrossRef Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesth Plast Surg 31:532–539CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesth Plast Surg 36:1096–1104CrossRef Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesth Plast Surg 36:1096–1104CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cuccolo NG, Kang CO, Boskey ER et al (2019) Epidemiologic characteristics and postoperative complications following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cuccolo NG, Kang CO, Boskey ER et al (2019) Epidemiologic characteristics and postoperative complications following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Djordjevic ML, Bizic MR, Duisin D et al (2016) Reversal surgery in regretful male-to-female transsexuals after sex reassignment surgery. J Sex Med 13:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed Djordjevic ML, Bizic MR, Duisin D et al (2016) Reversal surgery in regretful male-to-female transsexuals after sex reassignment surgery. J Sex Med 13:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M et al (2011) Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgenderism 13:165e232 Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M et al (2011) Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgenderism 13:165e232
31.
go back to reference Kuiper B, Cohen-Kettenis P (1988) Sex reassignment surgery: a study of 141 Dutch transsexuals. Arch Sex Behav 17:439e57CrossRef Kuiper B, Cohen-Kettenis P (1988) Sex reassignment surgery: a study of 141 Dutch transsexuals. Arch Sex Behav 17:439e57CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Latham J (2013) Ethical issues in considering transsexual surgery as aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 35:648e9 Latham J (2013) Ethical issues in considering transsexual surgery as aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 35:648e9
33.
go back to reference Sterodimas A, Radwanski HN, Pitanguy I (2011) Ethical issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery (review). Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:262–267CrossRefPubMed Sterodimas A, Radwanski HN, Pitanguy I (2011) Ethical issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery (review). Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:262–267CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Retrospective Study on Optimizing Breast Augmentation Outcomes in Transgender Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique
Authors
Matilde Tettamanzi
Federico Ziani
Manuela Rodio
Giovanni Arrica
Giovanni Muratore
Anna Manconi
Claudia Trignano
Edoardo Beatrici
Corrado Liperi
Corrado Rubino
Emilio Trignano
Publication date
08-03-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03922-5