Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010

01-09-2010 | Epidemiology

BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 44,903 subjects

Authors: Li-Xin Qiu, Lei Yao, Kai Xue, Jian Zhang, Chen Mao, Bo Chen, Ping Zhan, Hui Yuan, Xi-Chun Hu

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Published data on the association between BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between them. A total of 22 studies including 22,515 cases and 22,388 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (NH versus NN: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97–1.05; HH versus NN: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.97–1.13; dominant model: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98–1.05; and recessive model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.98–1.13). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found for Caucasians, Asians, or Africans. When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found for 372H allele based on population-based studies (HH versus NN: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01–1.21; dominant model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10; recessive model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the BRCA2 372H allele may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. N Engl J Med 343:78–85CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. N Engl J Med 343:78–85CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M (2002) Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet 31:33–36CrossRefPubMed Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M (2002) Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet 31:33–36CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Healey CS, Dunning AM, Teare MD (2000) A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability. Nat Genet 26:362–364CrossRefPubMed Healey CS, Dunning AM, Teare MD (2000) A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability. Nat Genet 26:362–364CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Spurdle AB, Hopper JL, Chen X (2002) The BRCA2 372 HH genotype is associated with risk of breast cancer in Australian women under age 60 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:413–416PubMed Spurdle AB, Hopper JL, Chen X (2002) The BRCA2 372 HH genotype is associated with risk of breast cancer in Australian women under age 60 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:413–416PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cox DG, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ (2005) No association between BRCA2 N372H and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1353–1354CrossRefPubMed Cox DG, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ (2005) No association between BRCA2 N372H and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1353–1354CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Brinton LA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Chanock S (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 119:376–388CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Brinton LA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Chanock S (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 119:376–388CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pharoah P for The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396CrossRef Pharoah P for The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Seymour IJ, Casadei S, Zampiga V (2008) Disease family history and modification of breast cancer risk in common BRCA2 variants. Oncol Rep 19:783–786PubMed Seymour IJ, Casadei S, Zampiga V (2008) Disease family history and modification of breast cancer risk in common BRCA2 variants. Oncol Rep 19:783–786PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ishitobi M, Miyoshi Y, Ando A (2003) Association of BRCA2 polymorphism at codon 784 (Met/Val) with breast cancer risk and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 9:1376–1380PubMed Ishitobi M, Miyoshi Y, Ando A (2003) Association of BRCA2 polymorphism at codon 784 (Met/Val) with breast cancer risk and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 9:1376–1380PubMed
12.
go back to reference Menzel HJ, Sarmanova J, Soucek P (2004) Association of NQO1 polymorphism with spontaneous breast cancer in two independent populations. Br J Cancer 90:1989–1994CrossRefPubMed Menzel HJ, Sarmanova J, Soucek P (2004) Association of NQO1 polymorphism with spontaneous breast cancer in two independent populations. Br J Cancer 90:1989–1994CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T (2005) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2326–2334CrossRefPubMed Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T (2005) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2326–2334CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17 Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17
18.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed
Metadata
Title
BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 44,903 subjects
Authors
Li-Xin Qiu
Lei Yao
Kai Xue
Jian Zhang
Chen Mao
Bo Chen
Ping Zhan
Hui Yuan
Xi-Chun Hu
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0767-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine