Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations

Authors: Alessandro Vichi, Mariam Margvelashvili, Cecilia Goracci, Federica Papacchini, Marco Ferrari

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2013

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to assess by means of shear bond strength tests (SBS), microleakage analysis (μLKG), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the bonding potential and sealing ability of a new self-adhering composite resin.

Materials and methods

SBS and μLKG of Vertise Flow (VF, Kerr) were measured and compared to the all-in-one adhesive systems G-Bond (GB, GC), AdheSE One (AO, Ivoclar Vivadent), Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE), Xeno V (XV, Dentsply), and iBOND (iB, Heraeus Kulzer). For each system, 20 molars were tested for SBS on dentin (n = 10) and enamel (n = 10). For μLKG assessment, 12 premolars per group were selected and small, box-shaped cavities were made. After restoration, the teeth were immersed in 50 wt% silver nitrate solution for 24 h. For each group, 10 randomly selected specimens were processed for leakage calculations, while two of the specimens were examined under SEM. Between-group differences in SBS to dentin and μLKG were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance followed by the Dunn’s Multiple Range test. Enamel SBS data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test.

Results

On dentin and enamel, VF recorded the lowest SBS values that were statistically comparable to those measured by GB, iB, and AO. μLKG analysis showed the lowest percentage of stained interface for VF. Significantly greater extent of infiltration was seen for iB and EB.

Conclusions

Although VF resulted in lower bond strengths values on either dental substrate, better marginal sealing ability was visualized in comparison with all-in-one adhesive systems.

Clinical relevance

The results of the present study demonstrated satisfactory in vitro outcome of the self-adhering flowable composite resin VF when used to restore class I cavities.

Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J (2009) Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88:558–578PubMed

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek BA (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132PubMedCrossRef

Finger WJ, Shao B, Hoffmann M, Endo T, Komatsu M (2007) Does application of phase-separated self-etching adhesives affect the bond strength? J Adhes Dent 9:169–173PubMed

Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895–910PubMedCrossRef

Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW (2006) In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I—microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 8:367–373PubMed

Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Piotevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 84:183–188PubMedCrossRef

Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 22:533–544PubMedCrossRef

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives. J Dent Res 86:739–744PubMedCrossRef

Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K (2005) Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 24:1–13PubMedCrossRef

10.

Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH (1996) Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 75:1034–1044PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH (1996) Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 12:236–244PubMedCrossRef

12.

Pashley DH, Tay FR (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 17:296–308PubMedCrossRef

13.

Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567–577PubMed

14.

Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Papadogiannis Y, Lakes RS, Dionysopoulos P, Papadogiannis D (2006) Dynamic and static elastic moduli of packable and flowable composite resins and their development after initial photo curing. Dent Mater 22:450–459PubMedCrossRef

15.

Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15:128–137PubMedCrossRef

16.

Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA (2001) Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 26:302–307PubMed

17.

Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH (1999) Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30:249–257PubMed

18.

Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D (2003) Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 69:516–521PubMed

19.

Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21:17–24PubMed

20.

Baroudi KN, Silikas N, Watts DC (2007) Time-dependent visco-elastic creep and recovery of flowable composites. Eur J Oral Sci 115:517–521PubMedCrossRef

21.

Chuang SF, Liu KJ, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH (2001) Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:117–183CrossRef

22.

He Z, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Ikeda M, Tagami J (2008) The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to class I cavities. J Adhes Dent 10:447–453PubMed

23.

Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH (1999) Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 78:898–905PubMedCrossRef

24.

Going RE (1972) Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 84:1349–1357PubMed

25.

Taylor MJ, Lynch E (1992) Microleakage. J Dent 20:3–10PubMedCrossRef

26.

Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555–562PubMedCrossRef

27.

Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 26:38–49CrossRef

28.

Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M (2012) Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 57:220–226PubMedCrossRef

29.

Vichi A, Carrabba M, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2011) Extent of cement polymerization along dowel space as a function of the interaction between adhesive and cement in fiber post cementation. J Adhes Dent 14:51–57

30.

Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Gomes G (2011) In vitro sealing potential of a self-adhesive pit and fissure sealant. Quintessence Int 42:e67–e73

31.

De la Macorra JC (2007) Statistics: a nuisance, a tool, or a must? J Adhes Dent 9:287–288

32.

Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Rosales-Leal JI, Rodriguez-Valverde MA, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA (2008) Wettability and bonding of self-etching dental adhesives. Influence of the smear layer. Dent Mater 24:994–1000PubMedCrossRef

33.

Erickson RL (1992) Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent Suppl 5:81–94

34.

Hirasawa T, Hirano S, Hirabayashi S, Harashima I, Aizawa M (1983) Initial dimensional change of composites in dry and wet conditions. J Dent Res 62:28–31PubMedCrossRef

35.

Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Takahashi M, Itoh S, Ikeda M, Tagami J, Pashley DH (2010) Relationship between mechanical properties of one-step self-etch adhesives and water sorption. Dent Mater 26:360–367PubMedCrossRef

36.

Ferracane JL (2006) Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 22:211–222PubMedCrossRef

37.

Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC (2010) Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27:259–266PubMedCrossRef

38.

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Lee MS, Tu LS, Delong R (2011) Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Dent Mater 27:126–133PubMedCrossRef

39.

Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435–440PubMedCrossRef

40.

Bortolotto T, Mileo A, Krejci I (2010) Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: an in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater 26:242–248PubMedCrossRef

41.

Cenci M, Demarco F, de Carvalho R (2005) Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. J Dent 33:603–610PubMedCrossRef

42.

Guzman-Ruiz S, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS, Vargas MA (2001) Association between microtensile bond strength and leakage in the indirect resin composite/dentin adhesively bonded joint. J Dent 29:145–153PubMedCrossRef

43.

Ding PG, Wolff D, Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Dannewitz B (2009) Relationship between microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface. Dent Mater 25:135–141PubMedCrossRef

44.

Guzman-Armstrong S, Armstrong SR, Qian F (2003) Relationship between nanoleakage and microtensile bond strength at the resin–dentin interface. Oper Dent 28:60–66PubMed

45.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E (2008) Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 24:90–101PubMedCrossRef

46.

Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA (1999) Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 12:181–184PubMed

47.

Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J (1999) Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 27:523–530PubMedCrossRef

48.

Kugel G, Ferrari M (2000) The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 131(Suppl):20S–25SPubMed

49.

Pilecki P, Stone DG, Sherriff M, Watson TF (2005) Microtensile bond strengths to enamel of self-etching and one bottle adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 32:531–540PubMedCrossRef

50.

Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M (2010) In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent 38:106–112PubMedCrossRef

51.

Nakabayashi N, Takarada K (1992) Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8:125–130PubMedCrossRef

52.

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 24:1412–1419PubMedCrossRef

53.

Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2008) Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentine surrounded by bonded enamel. J Dent 36:80–86PubMedCrossRef

54.

Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, Koshiro K, Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Sano H (2007) Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 80:297–303PubMed

55.

Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM (1995) Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117–125PubMedCrossRef

56.

De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Testing bond strength: a review if the literature. Dent Mater 26:139–140CrossRef

57.

Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Apicella D, Sedda M, Magni E, Ferrari M (2011) The influence of composite mechanical properties on adhesive microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 13:323–331PubMed

58.

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J (2010) Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 26:100–121CrossRef

Title: Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations
Authors: Alessandro Vichi
Mariam Margvelashvili
Cecilia Goracci
Federica Papacchini
Marco Ferrari
Publication date: 01-07-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Validation and spectrophotometric analysis of crown discoloration induced by root canal sealers

A novel three-dimensional bone chip organ culture

The influence of parotid gland sparing on radiation damages of dental hard tissues

Correlation between hand/wrist and panoramic radiographs in severe secondary hyperparathyroidism

A micro-computed tomography study of canal configuration of multiple-canalled mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molar

Functional dental status and oral health-related quality of life in an over 40 years old Chinese population