Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2021

01-04-2021 | Original Article

Body mass index influences the risk of reoperation after first-time surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. A Danish cohort study, 2010–2016

Authors: Vibeke Weltz, Rikke Guldberg, Michael Due Larsen, Gunnar Lose

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) up to 5 years after first-time surgery.

Materials and methods

This nationwide register-based study includes first-time POP surgery in 2010 through 2016. The cumulative incidence proportions of reoperation were analyzed in a Cox regression model and described using Kaplan-Meier plots stratified in BMI categories.

Results

A total of 28,533 first-time procedures were performed in 22,624 women; 76.6% had single-compartment repair. The 1- and 5-year reoperation rate within the same compartment was 2.6% and 6.1% respectively for women with BMI < 25, and for women with BMI > 35 it was 3.7% and 11.2 respectively. In the anterior compartment there was a significantly increased adjusted hazard ratio for reoperation in the same compartment with increasing BMI (reference group BMI < 25), BMI 30–34.9 with an aHR = 1.34 (CI 95% 1.04–1.71) and BMI ≥ 35 aHR = 1.77 (CI 95% 1.17–2.67). The 1- and 5-year reoperation rate in an adjacent compartment was 0.6% and 1.6% respectively for women with BMI < 25, and for women with BMI > 35 it was 1.0% and 4.4 respectively. For reoperation in an adjacent compartment the adjusted results were BMI 30–34.9 aHR = 1.64 (95% CI 1.05–2.56) and BMI > 35 aHR = 2.64 (95% CI 1.36–5.14) when the first-time operation was in the anterior compartment.

Conclusions

If the woman had BMI > 35 and first-time surgery was in the anterior compartment, she had an almost doubled risk of reoperation within 5 years both in the same compartment and in an adjacent compartment compared to women with BMI < 35. In the apical and posterior compartment there was a trend towards increasing risk of reoperation with increasing BMI, although with a broad confidence interval.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein AJ (Alan J., International Continence Society. (2017) Incontinence: 6th International Consultation on Incontinence, Tokyo Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein AJ (Alan J., International Continence Society. (2017) Incontinence: 6th International Consultation on Incontinence, Tokyo
5.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hansen UD, Gradel KO, Larsen MD (2016) Danish Urogynaecological Database. 709–712. Hansen UD, Gradel KO, Larsen MD (2016) Danish Urogynaecological Database. 709–712.
18.
go back to reference Nam K-H, Jeon M-J, Hur H-W, Kim S-K, Bai S-W. Perioperative and long-term complications among obese women undergoing vaginal surgery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;108:244–6.CrossRef Nam K-H, Jeon M-J, Hur H-W, Kim S-K, Bai S-W. Perioperative and long-term complications among obese women undergoing vaginal surgery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;108:244–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Body mass index influences the risk of reoperation after first-time surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. A Danish cohort study, 2010–2016
Authors
Vibeke Weltz
Rikke Guldberg
Michael Due Larsen
Gunnar Lose
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04482-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2021 Go to the issue