Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman, Section Editor)

Bleeding Complications After PCI and the Role of Transradial Access

Authors: Amit N. Vora, MD, MPH, Sunil V. Rao, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Opinion statement

Bleeding events are the most common complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are associated with increases in short- and long-term mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital length of stay, and hospital cost. Over time, there has been a decrease in periprocedural bleeding, primarily due to improvements in antithrombotic therapy; however, transradial (TR) catheterization has been shown to be an important strategy to minimize access site bleeding and potentially improve outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The rate of TR catheterization has been increasing significantly over the past few years and now accounts for an increasing proportion of procedures performed in the United States. Results from the recently published RIVAL Trial have shown comparable efficacy between transradial and transfemoral (TF) approaches with significant reduction in vascular access complications in the TR group. TR access in the STEMI population was prospectively assessed in the RIFLE-STEACS Trial and demonstrated significant reduction in the primary outcome of composite death/MI/stroke/target vessel revascularization/non-CABG bleeding. More recent studies have also demonstrated cost savings with TR access, related primarily to decreased hospital length of stay. While previous studies have shown increased operator radiation exposure compared to a TF approach, the most recent data suggest no significant difference in radiation at higher volume centers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Go AS et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(1):e6–e245.PubMedCrossRef Go AS et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(1):e6–e245.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rao SV et al. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(20):2187–95.PubMedCrossRef Rao SV et al. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(20):2187–95.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Batchelor WB et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):723–30.PubMedCrossRef Batchelor WB et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):723–30.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kinnaird TD et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(8):930–5.PubMedCrossRef Kinnaird TD et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(8):930–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lauer MA et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United States: 1995 to 1997. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(8):924–9.PubMedCrossRef Lauer MA et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United States: 1995 to 1997. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(8):924–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Popma JJ et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1569–78.PubMedCrossRef Popma JJ et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1569–78.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Manoukian SV et al. Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(12):1362–8.PubMedCrossRef Manoukian SV et al. Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(12):1362–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pinto DS et al. Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for early invasive management of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(22):1758–68.PubMedCrossRef Pinto DS et al. Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for early invasive management of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(22):1758–68.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aronow HD et al. Predictors of length of stay after coronary stenting. Am Heart J. 2001;142(5):799–805.PubMedCrossRef Aronow HD et al. Predictors of length of stay after coronary stenting. Am Heart J. 2001;142(5):799–805.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cohen DJ et al. Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(9):1792–800.PubMed Cohen DJ et al. Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(9):1792–800.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lopes RD et al. Advanced age, antithrombotic strategy, and bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(12):1021–30.PubMedCrossRef Lopes RD et al. Advanced age, antithrombotic strategy, and bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(12):1021–30.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nathan S, Rao SV. Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14(4):502–9.PubMedCrossRef Nathan S, Rao SV. Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14(4):502–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Doyle BJ et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(2):202–9.PubMedCrossRef Doyle BJ et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(2):202–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Feit F et al. Predictors and impact of major hemorrhage on mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention from the REPLACE-2 Trial. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(9):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef Feit F et al. Predictors and impact of major hemorrhage on mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention from the REPLACE-2 Trial. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(9):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kirtane AJ et al. Correlates of bleeding events among moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with eptifibatide: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2374–9.PubMedCrossRef Kirtane AJ et al. Correlates of bleeding events among moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with eptifibatide: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2374–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mehta SK et al. Bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the development of a clinical risk algorithm from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):222–9.PubMedCrossRef Mehta SK et al. Bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the development of a clinical risk algorithm from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):222–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stone GW et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(21):2203–16.PubMedCrossRef Stone GW et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(21):2203–16.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Subherwal S et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(21):1861–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Subherwal S et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(21):1861–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vaitkus PT. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(5):243–6.PubMed Vaitkus PT. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(5):243–6.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nikolsky E et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1200–9.PubMed Nikolsky E et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1200–9.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Marso SP et al. Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2156–64.PubMedCrossRef Marso SP et al. Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2156–64.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3–7.PubMedCrossRef Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Otaki M. Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiology. 1992;81(6):330–3.PubMedCrossRef Otaki M. Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiology. 1992;81(6):330–3.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994;128(1):167–74.PubMedCrossRef Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994;128(1):167–74.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995;129(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995;129(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lotan C et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76(3):164–7.PubMedCrossRef Lotan C et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76(3):164–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Feldman DN et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation. 2013;127(23):2295–306.PubMedCrossRef Feldman DN et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation. 2013;127(23):2295–306.PubMedCrossRef
28.••
go back to reference Jolly SS et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–20. The RIVAL Trial is the largest randomized trial comparing the transfemoral and transradial approaches to catheterization.PubMedCrossRef Jolly SS et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–20. The RIVAL Trial is the largest randomized trial comparing the transfemoral and transradial approaches to catheterization.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mehta SR et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2490–9.PubMedCrossRef Mehta SR et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2490–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.••
go back to reference Romagnoli E et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481–9. The RIFLE-STEACS is one of the largest trials specifically looking at the use of transradial access in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.PubMedCrossRef Romagnoli E et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481–9. The RIFLE-STEACS is one of the largest trials specifically looking at the use of transradial access in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stone GW et al. Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2218–30.PubMedCrossRef Stone GW et al. Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2218–30.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Baklanov DV et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):420–6.PubMedCrossRef Baklanov DV et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):420–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mitchell MD et al. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):454–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mitchell MD et al. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):454–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Applegate R, et al. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(4):E375–84. Applegate R, et al. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(4):E375–84.
35.
go back to reference Safley DM et al. Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database. Am Heart J. 2013;165(3):303–9 e2.PubMedCrossRef Safley DM et al. Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database. Am Heart J. 2013;165(3):303–9 e2.PubMedCrossRef
36.•
go back to reference Amin AP, et al. Costs of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(8):827–34. This is a retrospective study assessing cost differences between transradial and transfemoral access, describing the potential costs savings from transradial access, predominantly due to a shorter length of stay. Amin AP, et al. Costs of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(8):827–34. This is a retrospective study assessing cost differences between transradial and transfemoral access, describing the potential costs savings from transradial access, predominantly due to a shorter length of stay.
37.
go back to reference Rao SV, Patel MR. The Value Proposition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(8):835–7.CrossRef Rao SV, Patel MR. The Value Proposition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(8):835–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference McGrath PD et al. RElation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA. 2000;284(24):3139–44.PubMedCrossRef McGrath PD et al. RElation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA. 2000;284(24):3139–44.PubMedCrossRef
39.•
go back to reference Jolly SS et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):258–66. This is a good study assessing the importance of operator volume on radiation exposure during TR catheterization.PubMedCrossRef Jolly SS et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):258–66. This is a good study assessing the importance of operator volume on radiation exposure during TR catheterization.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lo TS et al. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. Am Heart J. 2012;164(4):455–61.PubMedCrossRef Lo TS et al. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. Am Heart J. 2012;164(4):455–61.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ball WT et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):336–41.PubMedCrossRef Ball WT et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):336–41.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Spaulding C et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39(4):365–70.PubMedCrossRef Spaulding C et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39(4):365–70.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bleeding Complications After PCI and the Role of Transradial Access
Authors
Amit N. Vora, MD, MPH
Sunil V. Rao, MD
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1092-8464
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3189
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-014-0305-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 5/2014 Go to the issue

Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman, Section Editor)

Intra-Coronary Imaging Modalities

Arrhythmia (D Spragg, Section Editor)

Optimal Strategies on Avoiding CRT Nonresponse

Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman, Section Editor)

Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions