Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study

Authors: Dr. Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich, Fabian Jäger, Andreas Jäger, Dr. Pascal Schumacher, Michael Wolf, Ulrike Fritz, Christoph Bourauel

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine and compare the mechanical properties of novel CAD/CAM(computer-aided design/manufacturing)-individualized nickel-titanium (NiTi) and conventional twisted wires.

Methods

Seven NiTi wires (angular, 0.20 × 0.20 mm up to 0.50 × 0.50 mm) and two twisted steel wires (round, 0.40 mm and 0.44 mm) were investigated in three-point (3PBT) and four-point bending tests (4PBT) using the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System. All wires were loaded up to a distance of 3.3 mm, and resulting forces were measured. Additionally, in the biomechanical test (BMT), CAD/CAM-individualized NiTi retainers (0.35 × 0.35 mm) were subjected to intrusive and extrusive deformation of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mm.

Results

For twisted wires, typical plastic deformations were found in 3PBT (0.40 mm: 0.3 mm; 0.44 mm: 0.4 mm), and maximum resulting forces for these reached 1.3 N and 3.2 N for the 0.40 mm and 0.44 mm wires, respectively. Corresponding values in the 4PBT totaled 0.8 N for the 0.40 mm and 1.9 N for the 0.44 mm twisted wire. The NiTi samples showed plastic deformations in the 3PBT for the 0.25 × 0.25 mm dimension and in 4PBT for the 0.35 mm × 0.35 mm version. At a deflection of 1.5 mm, both tests revealed significantly different forces for the NiTi wires of different dimensions (p ≤ 0.001). In the BMT, no remarkable loading plateau or plastic deformation was observed. The resulting forces were significantly higher for extrusive than for intrusive deformation (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Individualized NiTi retainers feature specific elasticity and dimensional stability, and more deflection is necessary to achieve permanent deformations. The CAD/CAM production process did not significantly influence the biomechanical properties of the NiTi wires.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alobeid A, Dirk C, Reimann S, El-Bialy T, Jager A, Bourauel C (2017) Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests : an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 78:241–252CrossRefPubMed Alobeid A, Dirk C, Reimann S, El-Bialy T, Jager A, Bourauel C (2017) Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests : an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 78:241–252CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Angle EH (1907) Malocclusion of teeth, 7th edn. White dental manufactoring Co, Philadelphia Angle EH (1907) Malocclusion of teeth, 7th edn. White dental manufactoring Co, Philadelphia
3.
go back to reference Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA (1997) A 3‑year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod 19:501–509CrossRefPubMed Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA (1997) A 3‑year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod 19:501–509CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA, McNeill RW, Chapko MK (1987) Hygiene status associated with different types of bonded, orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. A clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 14:89–94CrossRefPubMed Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA, McNeill RW, Chapko MK (1987) Hygiene status associated with different types of bonded, orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. A clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 14:89–94CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Axelsson S, Zachrisson BU (1992) Clinical experience with direct-bonded labial retainers. J Clin Orthod 26:480–490PubMed Axelsson S, Zachrisson BU (1992) Clinical experience with direct-bonded labial retainers. J Clin Orthod 26:480–490PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bearn DR (1995) Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:207–213CrossRefPubMed Bearn DR (1995) Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:207–213CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR (2008) Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:70–76CrossRefPubMed Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR (2008) Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:70–76CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Butler J, Dowling P (2005) Orthodontic bonded retainers. J Ir Dent Assoc 51:29–32PubMed Butler J, Dowling P (2005) Orthodontic bonded retainers. J Ir Dent Assoc 51:29–32PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU (1991) Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 25:619–630PubMed Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU (1991) Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 25:619–630PubMed
11.
go back to reference Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 13:169–178CrossRefPubMed Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 13:169–178CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Garrec P, Jordan L (2004) Stiffness in bending of a superelastic Ni-Ti orthodontic wire as a function of cross-sectional dimension. Angle Orthod 74:691–696PubMed Garrec P, Jordan L (2004) Stiffness in bending of a superelastic Ni-Ti orthodontic wire as a function of cross-sectional dimension. Angle Orthod 74:691–696PubMed
13.
go back to reference Heier EE, De Smit AA, Wijgaerts IA, Adriaens PA (1997) Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:607–616CrossRefPubMed Heier EE, De Smit AA, Wijgaerts IA, Adriaens PA (1997) Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:607–616CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Juvvadi SR, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S, Chitharanjan AB (2010) Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:623–630CrossRefPubMed Juvvadi SR, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S, Chitharanjan AB (2010) Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:623–630CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema AM (2007) Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:838–841CrossRefPubMed Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema AM (2007) Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:838–841CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C (1993) The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:323–331CrossRefPubMed Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C (1993) The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:323–331CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Knierim RW (1973) Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthod 43:218–220PubMed Knierim RW (1973) Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthod 43:218–220PubMed
19.
go back to reference Korioth TW, Waldron TW, Versluis A, Schulte JK (1997) Forces and moments generated at the dental incisors during forceful biting in humans. J Biomech 30:631–633CrossRefPubMed Korioth TW, Waldron TW, Versluis A, Schulte JK (1997) Forces and moments generated at the dental incisors during forceful biting in humans. J Biomech 30:631–633CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P, Jo YM (2017) Memotain: a CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151:812–815CrossRefPubMed Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P, Jo YM (2017) Memotain: a CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151:812–815CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nakano H, Satoh K, Norris R et al (1999) Mechanical properties of several nickel-titanium alloy wires in three-point bending tests. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:390–395CrossRefPubMed Nakano H, Satoh K, Norris R et al (1999) Mechanical properties of several nickel-titanium alloy wires in three-point bending tests. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:390–395CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW (1998) Effects on human maximum bite force of biting on a softer or harder object. Arch Oral Biol 43:833–839CrossRefPubMed Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW (1998) Effects on human maximum bite force of biting on a softer or harder object. Arch Oral Biol 43:833–839CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pazera P, Fudalej P, Katsaros C (2012) Severe complication of a bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:406–409CrossRefPubMed Pazera P, Fudalej P, Katsaros C (2012) Severe complication of a bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:406–409CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Radlanski RJ, Zain ND (2004) Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer—a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthop 65:321–335CrossRefPubMed Radlanski RJ, Zain ND (2004) Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer—a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthop 65:321–335CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA (2008) Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134(2):179e1–179e8PubMed Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA (2008) Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134(2):179e1–179e8PubMed
27.
go back to reference Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C (2011) Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:614–621CrossRefPubMed Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C (2011) Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:614–621CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Roldan SI, Restrepo LG, Isaza JF, Velez LG, Buschang PH (2016) Are maximum bite forces of subjects 7 to 17 years of age related to malocclusion? Angle Orthod 86:456–461CrossRefPubMed Roldan SI, Restrepo LG, Isaza JF, Velez LG, Buschang PH (2016) Are maximum bite forces of subjects 7 to 17 years of age related to malocclusion? Angle Orthod 86:456–461CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Schwarze J, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1995) The mobility of the anterior teeth after the direct bonding of lingual retainers. A comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo measurements. Fortschr Kieferorthop 56:25–33CrossRefPubMed Schwarze J, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1995) The mobility of the anterior teeth after the direct bonding of lingual retainers. A comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo measurements. Fortschr Kieferorthop 56:25–33CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shaughnessy TG, Proffit WR, Samara SA (2016) Inadvertent tooth movement with fixed lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149:277–286CrossRefPubMed Shaughnessy TG, Proffit WR, Samara SA (2016) Inadvertent tooth movement with fixed lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149:277–286CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Sifakakis I, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2015) Residual stress analysis of fixed retainer wires after in vitro loading: can mastication-induced stresses produce an unfavorable effect? Biomed Tech (Berl) 60:617–622CrossRef Sifakakis I, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2015) Residual stress analysis of fixed retainer wires after in vitro loading: can mastication-induced stresses produce an unfavorable effect? Biomed Tech (Berl) 60:617–622CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Eliades T, Makou M, Katsaros C, Bourauel C (2011) In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:44–48CrossRefPubMed Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Eliades T, Makou M, Katsaros C, Bourauel C (2011) In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:44–48CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Stormann I, Ehmer U (2002) A prospective randomized study of different retainer types. J Orofac Orthop 63:42–50CrossRefPubMed Stormann I, Ehmer U (2002) A prospective randomized study of different retainer types. J Orofac Orthop 63:42–50CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Tonner RI, Waters NE (1994) The characteristics of super-elastic Ni-Ti wires in three-point bending. Part I: The effect of temperature. Eur J Orthod 16:409–419CrossRefPubMed Tonner RI, Waters NE (1994) The characteristics of super-elastic Ni-Ti wires in three-point bending. Part I: The effect of temperature. Eur J Orthod 16:409–419CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Watted N, Wieber M, Teuscher T, Schmitz N (2001) Comparison of incisor mobility after insertion of canine-to-canine lingual retainers bonded to two or to six teeth. A clinical study. J Orofac Orthop 62:387–396CrossRefPubMed Watted N, Wieber M, Teuscher T, Schmitz N (2001) Comparison of incisor mobility after insertion of canine-to-canine lingual retainers bonded to two or to six teeth. A clinical study. J Orofac Orthop 62:387–396CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Wilkinson PD, Dysart PS, Hood JA, Herbison GP (2002) Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:483–495CrossRefPubMed Wilkinson PD, Dysart PS, Hood JA, Herbison GP (2002) Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:483–495CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Wolf M, Schulte U, Kupper K et al (2016) Post-treatment changes in permanent retention. J Orofac Orthop 77:446–453CrossRefPubMed Wolf M, Schulte U, Kupper K et al (2016) Post-treatment changes in permanent retention. J Orofac Orthop 77:446–453CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Wolf M, Schumacher P, Jager F et al (2015) Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy. J Orofac Orthop 76:164–174CrossRefPubMed Wolf M, Schumacher P, Jager F et al (2015) Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy. J Orofac Orthop 76:164–174CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU (1977) Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 71:440–448CrossRefPubMed Zachrisson BU (1977) Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 71:440–448CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU (1997) Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin Orthod 31:562–583PubMed Zachrisson BU (1997) Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin Orthod 31:562–583PubMed
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study
Authors
Dr. Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Fabian Jäger
Andreas Jäger
Dr. Pascal Schumacher
Michael Wolf
Ulrike Fritz
Christoph Bourauel
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0144-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2018 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO