Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 1/2015

01-03-2015

Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fracture fixation: application of a 90° internal fixation model

Authors: Andrew J. Watt, Randal P. Ching, Jerry I. Huang

Published in: HAND | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Complications in metacarpal fracture treatment increase in proportion to the severity of the initial injury and the invasiveness of the surgical fixation technique. This manuscript evaluates the feasibility of minimizing internal fixation construct size and soft tissue dissection, while preserving the advantages of stable internal fixation in a biomechanical model. We hypothesized that comparable construct stability could be achieved with mini-plates in an orthogonal (90/90) configuration compared with a standard dorsal plating technique.

Methods

This hypothesis was evaluated in a transverse metacarpal fracture model. Twelve metacarpals were subject to either placement of a 2.0-mm six-hole dorsal plate or two 1.5-mm four-hole mini-plates in a 90/90 configuration. These constructs were tested to failure in a three-point bending apparatus, attaining failure force, displacement, and stiffness.

Results

Mean failure force was 353.5 ± 121.1 N for the dorsal plating construct and 358.8 ± 77.1 N for the orthogonal construct. Mean failure displacement was 3.3 ± 1.2 mm for the dorsal plating construct and 4.1 ± 0.9 mm for the orthogonal construct. Mean stiffness was 161.3 ± 50.0 N/mm for the dorsal plating construct and 122.1 ± 46.6 N/mm for the orthogonal construct. Mean failure moment was 3.09 ± 1.06 Nm for the dorsal plating construct and 3.14 ± 0.67 Nm for the orthogonal construct. The dorsal plating group failed via screw pullout, whereas the orthogonal failed either by screw pullout or breakage of the plate.

Conclusions

When subject to apex dorsal bending, the orthogonal construct and the standard dorsal plate construct behaved comparably. These data suggest that despite its shorter length, lower profile, and less substantial screws, the orthogonal construct provides sufficient rigidity.

Clinical Relevance

This study represents a “proof of concept” regarding the applicability of orthogonal plating in the metacarpal and provides the foundation for minimizing construct size and profile.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bach HG, Gonzalez MH, Hall Jr RF. Locked intramedullary nailing of metacarpal fractures secondary to gunshot wounds. J Hand Surg. 2006;31A:1083–7.CrossRef Bach HG, Gonzalez MH, Hall Jr RF. Locked intramedullary nailing of metacarpal fractures secondary to gunshot wounds. J Hand Surg. 2006;31A:1083–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg. 2001;26A:908–15.CrossRef Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg. 2001;26A:908–15.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dabezies EJ, Schutte JP. Fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature plates and screws. J Hand Surg. 1986;11A:283–8.CrossRef Dabezies EJ, Schutte JP. Fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature plates and screws. J Hand Surg. 1986;11A:283–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dona E, Gillie RM, Gianoutsos MP, Walsh WR. Plating of metacarpal fractures: unicortical or bicortical screws? J Hand Surg. 2004;29B:218–21. Dona E, Gillie RM, Gianoutsos MP, Walsh WR. Plating of metacarpal fractures: unicortical or bicortical screws? J Hand Surg. 2004;29B:218–21.
5.
go back to reference Fambrough RA, Green DP. Tendon rupture as a complication of screw fixation in fractures in the hand: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61A:781–2. Fambrough RA, Green DP. Tendon rupture as a complication of screw fixation in fractures in the hand: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61A:781–2.
6.
go back to reference Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Howey T, Castaneda E, Pirela-Cruz MA. Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg. 1993;18A:1059–68.CrossRef Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Howey T, Castaneda E, Pirela-Cruz MA. Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg. 1993;18A:1059–68.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fischer KJ, Bastidas JA, Provenzano DA, Tomaino MM. Low-profile versus conventional metacarpal plating systems: a comparison of construct stiffness and strength. J Hand Surg. 1999;24A:928–34.CrossRef Fischer KJ, Bastidas JA, Provenzano DA, Tomaino MM. Low-profile versus conventional metacarpal plating systems: a comparison of construct stiffness and strength. J Hand Surg. 1999;24A:928–34.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG, Burke FD. Fractures of the metacarpals: treatment by AO screw and plate fixation. J Hand Surg. 1987; 12B: 34–37 Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG, Burke FD. Fractures of the metacarpals: treatment by AO screw and plate fixation. J Hand Surg. 1987; 12B: 34–37
9.
go back to reference Freeland AE, Orbay JL. Extraarticular hand fractures in adults: a review of new developments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:133–45.PubMed Freeland AE, Orbay JL. Extraarticular hand fractures in adults: a review of new developments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:133–45.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK, Curtiss SB. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A:1851–8.CrossRef Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK, Curtiss SB. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A:1851–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gonzalez MH, Ingram CM, Hall Jr RF. Flexible intramedullary nailing for metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg. 1995;20A:382–7.CrossRef Gonzalez MH, Ingram CM, Hall Jr RF. Flexible intramedullary nailing for metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg. 1995;20A:382–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Green A. Open reduction and internal fixation with 90-90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures. Instr Course Lectures. 2009;58:515–9. Green A. Open reduction and internal fixation with 90-90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures. Instr Course Lectures. 2009;58:515–9.
13.
go back to reference Helmerhorst GT, Kloen P. Orthogonal plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures with an associated radial column fracture via a single volar approach. Injury. 2012;43(8):1307–12.CrossRefPubMed Helmerhorst GT, Kloen P. Orthogonal plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures with an associated radial column fracture via a single volar approach. Injury. 2012;43(8):1307–12.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kawamura K, Chung KC. Fixation choices for closed simple unstable oblique phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Hand Clin. 2006;22:287–95.CrossRefPubMed Kawamura K, Chung KC. Fixation choices for closed simple unstable oblique phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Hand Clin. 2006;22:287–95.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kozin SH, THoder JJ, Lieberman G. Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:111–21.PubMed Kozin SH, THoder JJ, Lieberman G. Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:111–21.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Orbay J. Intramedullary nailing of metacarpal shaft fractures. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2005;9:69–73.CrossRefPubMed Orbay J. Intramedullary nailing of metacarpal shaft fractures. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2005;9:69–73.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ozer K, Gillani S, Williams A, Peterson SL, Morgan S. Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plate and screw fixation of extra-articular metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:1724–31.CrossRef Ozer K, Gillani S, Williams A, Peterson SL, Morgan S. Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plate and screw fixation of extra-articular metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:1724–31.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Page SM, Stern PJ. Complications and range of motion following plate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg. 1998;23A:827–32.CrossRef Page SM, Stern PJ. Complications and range of motion following plate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg. 1998;23A:827–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Prevel CD, McCarty M, Katona T, Moore K, Jackson JR, Eppley BL, et al. Comparative biomechanical stability of titanium bone fixation systems in metacarpal fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:6–14.CrossRefPubMed Prevel CD, McCarty M, Katona T, Moore K, Jackson JR, Eppley BL, et al. Comparative biomechanical stability of titanium bone fixation systems in metacarpal fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:6–14.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):2–9.CrossRefPubMed Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):2–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sletten IN, Nordsletten L, Husby T, Odegaard RA, Hellund JC, Kvernmo HD. Isolated, extra-articular neck and shaft fractures of the 4th and 5th metacarpals: a comparison of transverse and bouquet (intra-medullary) pinning in 67 patients. J Hand Surg (Eur). 2012;37:387–95.CrossRef Sletten IN, Nordsletten L, Husby T, Odegaard RA, Hellund JC, Kvernmo HD. Isolated, extra-articular neck and shaft fractures of the 4th and 5th metacarpals: a comparison of transverse and bouquet (intra-medullary) pinning in 67 patients. J Hand Surg (Eur). 2012;37:387–95.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sohn RC, Jahng KH, Curtiss AS, Szabo RM. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:316–21.CrossRef Sohn RC, Jahng KH, Curtiss AS, Szabo RM. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:316–21.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stern PJ, Wieser MJ, Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:59–65.PubMed Stern PJ, Wieser MJ, Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:59–65.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Vanik RK, Weber RC, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Gingrass RP. The comparative strengths of internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg. 1984;9A:216–21.CrossRef Vanik RK, Weber RC, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Gingrass RP. The comparative strengths of internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg. 1984;9A:216–21.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vennetilli M, Athwal GS. Parallel versus orthogonal plating for distal humerus fractures. J Hand Surg. 2012;37A:819–20.CrossRef Vennetilli M, Athwal GS. Parallel versus orthogonal plating for distal humerus fractures. J Hand Surg. 2012;37A:819–20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Raatikainen T, Tormala P, Santavirta S, Konttinen YT. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable versus metallic fixation systems for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg. 2002;27A:902–9.CrossRef Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Raatikainen T, Tormala P, Santavirta S, Konttinen YT. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable versus metallic fixation systems for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg. 2002;27A:902–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fracture fixation: application of a 90° internal fixation model
Authors
Andrew J. Watt
Randal P. Ching
Jerry I. Huang
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HAND / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9673-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

HAND 1/2015 Go to the issue