Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 1/2015

01-03-2015

Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in hand fractures and dislocations

Authors: Christine B. Novak, Marianne M. Williams, Kathleen Conaty

Published in: HAND | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Generic upper extremity disability questionnaires utilize standardized items. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) allows the patient to identify specific self-reported items. This study evaluated the validity of the PSFS to assess outcome in patients with hand fractures or dislocations.

Methods

Adults with hand fractures or dislocations, who completed hand therapy between January 2012 and January 2013, were eligible for inclusion. At the initial and final assessment, each patient was asked to complete the PSFS. Each patient identified three items that were difficult or they were unable to perform, and the degree of difficulty was ranked from 0 to 10 (able to perform at pre-injury level). We excluded patients with an incomplete PSFS. Statistical analyses evaluated the relationships between the PSFS and the independent variables.

Results

There were 63 patients (37 men, 26 women); 21 of the 63 patients underwent surgery for fracture fixation. The mean duration of hand therapy treatment was 2.2 ± 1.4 months. The mean PSFS scores were as follows: initial 3.2 ± 2.2; final 8.1 ± 2.2. There was a significant improvement in PSFS scores from initial to final assessment (p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation (r = 0.3, p = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in PSFS scores between men and women or surgery and no surgery.

Conclusions

In these patients with hand fractures or dislocations, the PSFS indicated significant improvement in function. Using items identified by the patient, the PSFS provides a valuable perspective of outcome and may be used in conjunction with generic disease-specific questionnaire for assessment of the upper extremity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–46.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–46.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg. 1998;23A:575–87.CrossRef Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg. 1998;23A:575–87.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598–602.CrossRefPubMed Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598–602.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg. 2003;28A:250–4.CrossRef Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg. 2003;28A:250–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gross DP, Mattie MC, Asante AK. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers’ compensation claimants. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1294–9.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Mattie MC, Asante AK. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers’ compensation claimants. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1294–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–8.CrossRefPubMed Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:7–12.CrossRefPubMed Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:7–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand. 2009;4:311–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand. 2009;4:311–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Mackinnon SE, Katz J. Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury. Hand. 2013;8:132–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Mackinnon SE, Katz J. Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury. Hand. 2013;8:132–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pengel LHM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness for pain, disability and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:879–83.CrossRefPubMed Pengel LHM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness for pain, disability and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:879–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg. 2008;27A:537–41. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg. 2008;27A:537–41.
12.
go back to reference Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47:258–62.CrossRef Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47:258–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Westaway M, Stratford P, Binkley J. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–8.CrossRefPubMed Westaway M, Stratford P, Binkley J. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in hand fractures and dislocations
Authors
Christine B. Novak
Marianne M. Williams
Kathleen Conaty
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HAND / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9658-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

HAND 1/2015 Go to the issue