Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia

Authors: José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Marta Satorres, Bruno Negri, Piedad Ramirez-Fernandez, Jose Eduardo Maté-Sánchez, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Gerardo Gomez-Moreno, Marcus Abboud, Georgios E. Romanos

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study presents a biomechanical comparison of bone response to commercially pure titanium screws with four different types of surface topographies placed in the tibial metaphysis of 30 rabbits.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty implants were tested double-blinded: (a) blasted, acid-etched, and discrete crystal deposition (DCD), (b) blasted, (c) acid-etched, and (d) blasted and acid-etch. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA/ISQ), reverse torque values (RTV), and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were measured at the time of implant insertion (day 0), 15, 28, and 56 days of healing.

Results

All groups tested demonstrated increased RFA/ISQ and RTV results over the time course. At 15 days, the blasted, acid-etched, and DCD group demonstrated a non-significant trend toward higher values when compared to the blasted and etched group (33.0 ± 16 vs. 26.3 ± 12 Ncm, p = .16). At 56 days, the groups utilizing blasting to create additional surface roughness (Sa > 1 micron) showed a statistical significant difference in RTQ versus the non-blasted group (38.5 ± 14 vs. 29.5 ± 9 Ncm, p = .03).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, only the increase in surface roughness (Ra > 1) at 56 days demonstrated statistically significant effects on RTQ. Other additional surface features, such as sub-micron scale DCD, demonstrated improved healing trends but without significance for clinical applications.
Literature
1.
Johansson CB, Gretzer C, Jimbo R, Mattisson I, Ahlberg E (2012) Enhanced implant integration with a hierarchically structured implants: a pillot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:943–953
2.
Stadlinger B, Ferguson SJ, Eckelt U, Mai R, Lode AT, Loukota R, Schlottig F (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydoxide ion solution. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:74–79
3.
Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA (2009) Influence of the surgical technique and surfece roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:327–332
4.
Albektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004) Oral implant surfaces: part 1 – review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 17:536–543
5.
Gottlow J, Barkarmo S, Sennerby L (2012) An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(S1e):204–212
6.
Faeda RS, Spin-Neto R, Marcantonio E, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E Jr (2012) Laser ablation in titanium implants followed by biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating: Histomorphometric study in rabbits. Microsc Res Tech 75:940–948
7.
Fontana F, Rocchietta I, Addis A, Schupbach P, Zanotti G, Simion M (2011) Effects of a calcium phosphate coating on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in a rabbit model. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:760–766
8.
He FM, Yang GL, Zhao SF, Cheng ZP (2011) Mechanical and Histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:115–122
9.
Johansson C, Albrektsson T (1987) Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:69–75
10.
Davies JE (2003) Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 67:932–949
11.
Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M (2005) Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: a histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7:S13–S20
12.
Susin C, Qahash M, Hall J, Sennerby L, Wikesjö UM (2008) Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 35:270–275
13.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004) Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—Review focusing on topographic and chemical proper- ties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 17:536–543
14.
Gobbato L, Arguello E, Martin IS, Hawley CE, Griffin TJ (2012) Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits. Implant Dent 21:454–460
15.
Park HS, Yeo IS, Yang JH (2010) A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Adv Prosthodont 2:142–147
16.
Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, Bonfante EA, Freire JNO, Janal MN, Gil JN, Suzuki M (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of endosseous implants at early implantation times: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1667–1675
17.
Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA (2009) Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:185–206
18.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2009) Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:172–184
19.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2010) On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:63–74
20.
Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF (2008) Advancing dental implant surface technology -from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 29:3822–3835
21.
Poulos NM, Rodriguez NA, Lee J, Rueggeberg FA, Schüpbach P, Hall J, Susin C, Wikesjö UM (2011) Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:731–738
22.
Svanborg LM, Andersson M, Wennerberg A (2010) Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. Journal Biomedical Material Research Part B: Appl Biomater 92:462–469
23.
Variola F, Brunski JB, Orsini G, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Wazen R, Nanci A (2011) Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives. Nanoscale 3:335–353
24.
Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE (2009) Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrys- talline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 90:577–585
25.
Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL et al (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83:529–533
26.
Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J et al (2007) Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:755–760
27.
Schätzle M, Männchen R, Balbach U, Hämmerle CH, Toutenburg H, Jung RE (2009) Stability change of chemically modified sand- blasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized- controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:489–495
28.
Elias CN, Meirelles L (2010) Improving osseointegration of dental implants. Expert Rev Med Devices 7:241–256
29.
Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig 11:245–255
30.
Ziebart T, Schnell A, Walter C, Kämmerer PW, Pabst A, Lehmann KM, Ziebart J et al (2013) Interactions between endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Invest 17:301–309
31.
Orsini G, Piatelli M, Scarano A, Petrone G, Kenealy J, Piatelli A et al (2007) Randomized, controlled, histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxila. J Periodontol 78:209–218
32.
Choi JY, Lee HJ, Jang JU, Yeo IS (2012) Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model. Implant Dent 21:124–128
33.
Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD (2001) Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:350–357
34.
Khan SH, Cho SA (2011) Comparison of removal torques for laser-treated titanium implants with anodized implants. J Craniofac Surg 22:1491–1495
35.
Kim SG, Hahn BD, Park DS, Lee YC, Choi EJ, Chae WS, Baek DH, Choi JY (2011) Aerosol deposition of hydroxyapatite and 4-hexylresorcinol coatings on titanium alloys for dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:354–363
36.
Park YS, Chung SH, Shon WJ (2013) Peri-implant bone formation and surface characteristics of rough surface zirconia implants manufactured by powder injection molding technique in rabbit tibiae. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:586–591
37.
Fuming H, Guoli Y, Xiaoxiang W, Shifang Z (2008) The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating. J Oral Rehabilit 35:754–765
38.
Al-Hamdan K, Al-Moaber SH, Junker R, Jansen JA (2011) Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:399–405
39.
Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T (2006) Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 19:319–328
40.
Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M (2009) Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:844–850
41.
Cheng Z, Zhang F, He F, Zhang L, Guo C, Zhao S, Yang G (2010) Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 110:5–12
42.
Suzuki M, Calasans-Maia MD, Marin C, Granato R, Gil JN, Granjeiro JM, Coelho PG (2010) Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1631–1638
43.
Quaranta A, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Coelho PG, Vozza I, Marincola M, Piattelli A (2010) A histomorphometric study of nanothickness and plasma-sprayed calcium-phosphorous-coated implant surfaces in rabbit bone. J Periodontol 81:556–561
44.
Queiroz TP, Souza FA, Guastaldi AC, Margonar R, Garcia-Júnior IR, Hochuli-Vieira E (2012) Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits. Clin Oral Implant Res 30. doi: 10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2012.​02471.​x
45.
Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Maté-Sanchez de Val JE, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Ramirez-Fernandez MP, Gomez-Moreno G, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Guardia J, Muñoz-Guzón F (2012) Biomechanical and bone histomorphological evaluation of two surfaces on tapered and cylindrical root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Impl Dent Related Res. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1708-8208.​2011.​00431.​x CrossRef
46.
Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Pardo-Zamora G, Ramírez-Fernández MP, Delgado-Ruíz RA, Muñoz-Guzón F (2012) Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 23:228–235
Metadata
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia
Authors
José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Marta Satorres
Bruno Negri
Piedad Ramirez-Fernandez
Jose Eduardo Maté-Sánchez
Rafael Delgado-Ruiz
Gerardo Gomez-Moreno
Marcus Abboud
Georgios E. Romanos
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1120-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014 Go to the issue

Original Article

The necessity of a test reading after 1 week to detect late positive patch test reactions in patients with oral lichen lesions

Original Article

Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions

Original Article

Porosity and root dentine to material interface assessment of calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials

Original Article

Permanent first molar extraction in adolescents and young adults and its effect on the development of third molar

Original Article

Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects

Original Article

Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry