Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Paediatric

Benchmarking pediatric cranial CT protocols using a dose tracking software system: a multicenter study

Authors: Timo De Bondt, Tom Mulkens, Federica Zanca, Lotte Pyfferoen, Jan W. Casselman, Paul M. Parizel

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To benchmark regional standard practice for paediatric cranial CT-procedures in terms of radiation dose and acquisition parameters.

Methods

Paediatric cranial CT-data were retrospectively collected during a 1-year period, in 3 different hospitals of the same country. A dose tracking system was used to automatically gather information. Dose (CTDI and DLP), scan length, amount of retakes and demographic data were stratified by age and clinical indication; appropriate use of child-specific protocols was assessed.

Results

In total, 296 paediatric cranial CT-procedures were collected. Although the median dose of each hospital was below national and international diagnostic reference level (DRL) for all age categories, statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) dose differences among hospitals were observed. The hospital with lowest dose levels showed smallest dose variability and used age-stratified protocols for standardizing paediatric head exams. Erroneous selection of adult protocols for children still occurred, mostly in the oldest age-group.

Conclusion

Even though all hospitals complied with national and international DRLs, dose tracking and benchmarking showed that further dose optimization and standardization is possible by using age-stratified protocols for paediatric cranial CT. Moreover, having a dose tracking system revealed that adult protocols are still applied for paediatric CT, a practice that must be avoided.

Key Points

Significant differences were observed in the delivered dose between age-groups and hospitals.
Using age-adapted scanning protocols gives a nearly linear dose increase.
Sharing dose-data can be a trigger for hospitals to reduce dose levels.
Literature
1.
go back to reference UNSCEAR (2008) Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Adnexes. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume 1 UNSCEAR (2008) Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Adnexes. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume 1
2.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference ICRP (1996) Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP 26 (2) ICRP (1996) Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP 26 (2)
8.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2007) Results of a federation inquiry 2005/2006: pediatric CT X-ray practice in Germany. Röfo 179:1110–1111PubMed Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2007) Results of a federation inquiry 2005/2006: pediatric CT X-ray practice in Germany. Röfo 179:1110–1111PubMed
10.
go back to reference Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007-2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007-2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Federal Office for Radiation Protection (2010) Notice of diagnostic reference levels for radiology and nuclear medicine examinations. [In German.] Salzgitter, Germany: Federal Office for Radiation Protection Federal Office for Radiation Protection (2010) Notice of diagnostic reference levels for radiology and nuclear medicine examinations. [In German.] Salzgitter, Germany: Federal Office for Radiation Protection
13.
go back to reference Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008. Radiology 259:793–801CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008. Radiology 259:793–801CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Larson DB, Molvin LZ, Wang J, Chan FP, Newman B, Fleischmann D (2014) Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):519–524CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Molvin LZ, Wang J, Chan FP, Newman B, Fleischmann D (2014) Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):519–524CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Watson DJ, Coakley KS (2010) Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr Radiol 40:693–703CrossRefPubMed Watson DJ, Coakley KS (2010) Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr Radiol 40:693–703CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 76:803–811CrossRefPubMed Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 76:803–811CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK (2014) Standardized CT protocols and nomenclature: better, but not yet there. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):440–443CrossRefPubMed Singh S, Kalra MK (2014) Standardized CT protocols and nomenclature: better, but not yet there. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):440–443CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kanal KM, Graves JM, Vavilala MS, Applegate KE, Jarvik JG, Rivara FP (2015) Variation in CT pediatric head examination radiation dose: results from a national survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W293–W301CrossRefPubMed Kanal KM, Graves JM, Vavilala MS, Applegate KE, Jarvik JG, Rivara FP (2015) Variation in CT pediatric head examination radiation dose: results from a national survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W293–W301CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:611–617CrossRefPubMed Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:611–617CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR (2010) Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosim 142:244–254CrossRef Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR (2010) Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosim 142:244–254CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Roch P, Aubert B (2013) French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004-2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim 154:52–75CrossRef Roch P, Aubert B (2013) French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004-2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim 154:52–75CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Santos J, Foley S, Paulo G, McEntee MF, Rainford L (2014) The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. Radiat Prot Dosim 158:307–317CrossRef Santos J, Foley S, Paulo G, McEntee MF, Rainford L (2014) The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. Radiat Prot Dosim 158:307–317CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Graves JM, Kanal KM, Rivara FP, Jarvik JG, Vavilala MS (2014) Dose reduction efforts for pediatric head CT imaging in Washington State trauma centers: follow-up survey results. J Am Coll Radiol 11:161–168 e163CrossRefPubMed Graves JM, Kanal KM, Rivara FP, Jarvik JG, Vavilala MS (2014) Dose reduction efforts for pediatric head CT imaging in Washington State trauma centers: follow-up survey results. J Am Coll Radiol 11:161–168 e163CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sharp NE, Svetanoff WJ, Desai A et al (2014) Radiation exposure from head computed tomography scans in pediatric trauma. J Surg Res 192:276–279CrossRefPubMed Sharp NE, Svetanoff WJ, Desai A et al (2014) Radiation exposure from head computed tomography scans in pediatric trauma. J Surg Res 192:276–279CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference McKnight CD, Watcharotone K, Ibrahim M, Christodoulou E, Baer AH, Parmar HA (2014) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: reducing dose while preserving image quality in the pediatric head CT examination. Pediatr Radiol 44:997–1003CrossRefPubMed McKnight CD, Watcharotone K, Ibrahim M, Christodoulou E, Baer AH, Parmar HA (2014) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: reducing dose while preserving image quality in the pediatric head CT examination. Pediatr Radiol 44:997–1003CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Paolicchi F, Faggioni L, Bastiani L et al (2014) Optimizing the balance between radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head CT: findings before and after intensive radiologic staff training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:1309–1315CrossRefPubMed Paolicchi F, Faggioni L, Bastiani L et al (2014) Optimizing the balance between radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head CT: findings before and after intensive radiologic staff training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:1309–1315CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference WHO (2013) Technical meeting report 2008. Global initiative on radiation safety in health settings. IAEA/WHO. Radiation protection of patients. In: Joint IAEA and WHO position statement on the Bonn call-for-action WHO (2013) Technical meeting report 2008. Global initiative on radiation safety in health settings. IAEA/WHO. Radiation protection of patients. In: Joint IAEA and WHO position statement on the Bonn call-for-action
33.
go back to reference MacGregor K, Li I, Dowdell T, Gray BG (2015) Identifying institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT with radiation dose index monitoring software. Radiology 276:507–517CrossRefPubMed MacGregor K, Li I, Dowdell T, Gray BG (2015) Identifying institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT with radiation dose index monitoring software. Radiology 276:507–517CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291CrossRefPubMed Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference McCrohan JL, Patterson JF, Gagne RM, Goldstein HA (1987) Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. Radiology 163:263–268CrossRefPubMed McCrohan JL, Patterson JF, Gagne RM, Goldstein HA (1987) Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. Radiology 163:263–268CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Pantos I, Thalassinou S, Argentos S, Kelekis NL, Panayiotakis G, Efstathopoulos EP (2011) Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. Br J Radiol 84:293–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pantos I, Thalassinou S, Argentos S, Kelekis NL, Panayiotakis G, Efstathopoulos EP (2011) Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. Br J Radiol 84:293–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Muhogora WE, Ahmed NA, Almosabihi A et al (2008) Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1453–1461CrossRefPubMed Muhogora WE, Ahmed NA, Almosabihi A et al (2008) Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1453–1461CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2. Dosimetric aspects. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991: report NRPB-R249 Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2. Dosimetric aspects. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991: report NRPB-R249
39.
go back to reference Brink JA (2014) Clinical decision-making tools for exam selection, reporting and dose tracking. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):418–421CrossRefPubMed Brink JA (2014) Clinical decision-making tools for exam selection, reporting and dose tracking. Pediatr Radiol 44(Suppl 3):418–421CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Winkler NT (1980) ALARA concept--now a requirement. Radiol Technol 51:525PubMed Winkler NT (1980) ALARA concept--now a requirement. Radiol Technol 51:525PubMed
Metadata
Title
Benchmarking pediatric cranial CT protocols using a dose tracking software system: a multicenter study
Authors
Timo De Bondt
Tom Mulkens
Federica Zanca
Lotte Pyfferoen
Jan W. Casselman
Paul M. Parizel
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4385-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

European Radiology 2/2017 Go to the issue