Skip to main content
Top
Published in: JA Clinical Reports 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Case report

Bedside insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter into a patient with BMI of 84.8 kg/m2 using a magnetic tracking and electrocardiogram-based tip confirmation system: a case report

Authors: Satoshi Uchida, Daiki Takekawa, Masaya Hori, Eiji Hashiba, Kazuyoshi Hirota

Published in: JA Clinical Reports | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are typically placed under fluoroscopy. We used a magnetic tracking and electrocardiogram-based tip confirmation system for insertion of a PICC insertion in a morbidly obese patient at the bedside.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old female with severe obesity (height, 160 cm; weight, 217 kg; BMI, 84.8 kg/m2) was admitted to the intensive care unit. Both bilateral, inguinal, and cervical regions were covered with an excess of adipose tissue, making it difficult to place a central venous line. Since transferring her to fluoroscopy seemed dangerous, a PICC was inserted using Sherlock 3CG® TCS at the bedside. Magnetic sensor guidance failed due to the thick subcutaneous tissue her precordium, but intracavity electrocardiography could direct the tip to an appropriate position.

Conclusion

We experienced bedside insertion of a PICC into a patient with BMI of 84.8 kg/m2 patient using a Sherlock 3CG® TCS. Since the interaction between Sherlock 3CG® TCS and body habitus has not been investigated, further reports are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edienne RSD, Kleyton SM, Richardson ARS, Ricardo NC, Angelo GR. Prevalence of complications associated with the use of a peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns: a systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0255090.CrossRef Edienne RSD, Kleyton SM, Richardson ARS, Ricardo NC, Angelo GR. Prevalence of complications associated with the use of a peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns: a systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0255090.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee JH, Kim MU, Kim ET, Shim DJ, Kim IJ, Byeon JH, et al. Prevalence and predictors of peripherally inserted central venous catheter associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients: a multicentre cohort study. Am J Infect Control. 2019;2:191–5. Lee JH, Kim MU, Kim ET, Shim DJ, Kim IJ, Byeon JH, et al. Prevalence and predictors of peripherally inserted central venous catheter associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients: a multicentre cohort study. Am J Infect Control. 2019;2:191–5.
3.
go back to reference McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.CrossRef McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yamagishi T, Ashida H, Igarashi T, Matsui Y, Nozawa Y, Higuchi T, et al. Clinical impact of the Sherlock 3CG® Tip Confirmation System for peripherally inserted central catheters. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:5176–82.CrossRef Yamagishi T, Ashida H, Igarashi T, Matsui Y, Nozawa Y, Higuchi T, et al. Clinical impact of the Sherlock 3CG® Tip Confirmation System for peripherally inserted central catheters. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:5176–82.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eva J, Fredrik H, Dag L, Marianne HA. Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:886–92.CrossRef Eva J, Fredrik H, Dag L, Marianne HA. Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:886–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Johnston AJ, Bishop SM, Martin L. Defining peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and an evaluation of insertions in one unit. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:484–91.CrossRef Johnston AJ, Bishop SM, Martin L. Defining peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and an evaluation of insertions in one unit. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:484–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glauser F, Breault S, Rigamonti F. Tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare bedside insertion to fluoroscopically guided placement. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2843–9.CrossRef Glauser F, Breault S, Rigamonti F. Tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare bedside insertion to fluoroscopically guided placement. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2843–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Megan D, Ailish H, Grace CR. Sherlock 3CG(®) Tip Confirmation System for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14:41–9.CrossRef Megan D, Ailish H, Grace CR. Sherlock 3CG(®) Tip Confirmation System for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14:41–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bedside insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter into a patient with BMI of 84.8 kg/m2 using a magnetic tracking and electrocardiogram-based tip confirmation system: a case report
Authors
Satoshi Uchida
Daiki Takekawa
Masaya Hori
Eiji Hashiba
Kazuyoshi Hirota
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
JA Clinical Reports / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2363-9024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-022-00559-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

JA Clinical Reports 1/2022 Go to the issue