Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Barrett Esophagus | Original Article

Measuring Barrett’s Epithelial Thickness with Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy as a Biomarker to Guide Treatment

Authors: I. J. M. Levink, H. C. Wolfsen, P. D. Siersema, M. B. Wallace, G. J. Tearney

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment outcomes vary for unknown reasons. One hypothesis is that variations in Barrett’s epithelial thickness (BET) are associated with reduced RFA efficacy for thicker BET and strictures for thinner BET. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is an imaging modality that acquires high-resolution, depth-resolved images of BE. However, the attenuation of light by tissue and the lack of layering in Barrett’s tissue challenge BET measurements and the study of relationships between thickness and RFA outcomes. We aimed to quantify BET and compared the reliability of standard and contrast-enhanced VLE images.

Methods

Baseline VLE scans from BE patients without prior ablative therapy and a Prague (M) length of > 1 cm were obtained from the US VLE Registry. An algorithm was applied to the VLE images to flatten the mucosal surface and enhance the contrast of different esophageal wall layers. Subsequently, BET was measured by two independent VLE readers using both contrast- and non-contrast-enhanced datasets. In order to validate these adjusted images, intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated.

Results

VLE scans from fifty-seven patients were included in this study. BET was measured at eight equidistant locations on the selected cross-sectional images at 0.5 cm intervals from the GEJ to the proximal-most extent of BE. The intra-observer coefficients of the two readers for the contrast-enhanced images were 0.818 (95% CI 0.798–0.836) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.878–0.900). The interobserver agreement for the contrast-enhanced images (0.880; 95% CI 0.867–0.891) was significantly better than for the original images (0.778; 95% CI 0.754–0.799).

Conclusion

We developed an algorithm that improves VLE visualization of the mucosal layers of the esophageal wall and enables rapid and reliable measurement of BET. Interobserver variability measurements were significantly reduced when using contrast enhancement. Studies are underway to correlate BET with treatment response.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sikkema M, de Jonge PJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:235–244. (quiz e32).CrossRef Sikkema M, de Jonge PJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:235–244. (quiz e32).CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ganz RA, Utley DS, Stern RA, et al. Complete ablation of esophageal epithelium with a balloon-based bipolar electrode: a phased evaluation in the porcine and in the human esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed Ganz RA, Utley DS, Stern RA, et al. Complete ablation of esophageal epithelium with a balloon-based bipolar electrode: a phased evaluation in the porcine and in the human esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Belghazi K, Cipollone I, Bergman JJ, et al. Current controversies in radiofrequency ablation therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Curr Treat Opt Gastroenterol. 2016;14:1–18.CrossRef Belghazi K, Cipollone I, Bergman JJ, et al. Current controversies in radiofrequency ablation therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Curr Treat Opt Gastroenterol. 2016;14:1–18.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1209–1217.CrossRefPubMed Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1209–1217.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim HP, Bulsiewicz WJ, Cotton CC, et al. Focal endoscopic mucosal resection before radiofrequency ablation is equally effective and safe compared with radiofrequency ablation alone for the eradication of Barrett’s esophagus with advanced neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:733–739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim HP, Bulsiewicz WJ, Cotton CC, et al. Focal endoscopic mucosal resection before radiofrequency ablation is equally effective and safe compared with radiofrequency ablation alone for the eradication of Barrett’s esophagus with advanced neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:733–739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Vakoc BJ, Shishko M, Yun SH, et al. Comprehensive esophageal microscopy by using optical frequency-domain imaging (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:898–905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vakoc BJ, Shishko M, Yun SH, et al. Comprehensive esophageal microscopy by using optical frequency-domain imaging (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:898–905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gupta N, Siddiqui U, Waxman I, et al. Use of volumetric laser endomicroscopy for dysplasia detection at the gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:319–326.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta N, Siddiqui U, Waxman I, et al. Use of volumetric laser endomicroscopy for dysplasia detection at the gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:319–326.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Teo JC, Foin N, Otsuka F, et al. Optimization of coronary optical coherence tomography imaging using the attenuation-compensated technique: a validation study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;18:880. Teo JC, Foin N, Otsuka F, et al. Optimization of coronary optical coherence tomography imaging using the attenuation-compensated technique: a validation study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;18:880.
9.
go back to reference Ughi GJ, Gora MJ, Swager AF, et al. Automated segmentation and characterization of esophageal wall in vivo by tethered capsule optical coherence tomography endomicroscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7:409–419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ughi GJ, Gora MJ, Swager AF, et al. Automated segmentation and characterization of esophageal wall in vivo by tethered capsule optical coherence tomography endomicroscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7:409–419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Thosani N, Abu Dayyeh BK, Sharma P, et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging-assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:e7.CrossRef Thosani N, Abu Dayyeh BK, Sharma P, et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging-assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:e7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fugazza A, Gaiani F, Carra MC, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4638683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fugazza A, Gaiani F, Carra MC, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4638683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Srivastava AK, Vanagunas A, Kamel P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus: a preliminary report. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:2192–2195.PubMed Srivastava AK, Vanagunas A, Kamel P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus: a preliminary report. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:2192–2195.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gill KR, Ghabril MS, Jamil LH, et al. Variation in Barrett’s esophageal wall thickness: is it associated with histology or segment length? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:411–415.CrossRefPubMed Gill KR, Ghabril MS, Jamil LH, et al. Variation in Barrett’s esophageal wall thickness: is it associated with histology or segment length? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:411–415.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Leggett CL, Gorospe EC, Chan DK, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of volumetric laser endomicroscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of dysplasia associated with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:880.e2–888.e2.CrossRef Leggett CL, Gorospe EC, Chan DK, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of volumetric laser endomicroscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of dysplasia associated with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:880.e2–888.e2.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tsai TH, Zhou C, Tao YK, et al. Structural markers observed with endoscopic 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography correlating with Barrett’s esophagus radiofrequency ablation treatment response (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:1104–1112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai TH, Zhou C, Tao YK, et al. Structural markers observed with endoscopic 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography correlating with Barrett’s esophagus radiofrequency ablation treatment response (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:1104–1112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Swager AF, van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, et al. Computer-aided detection of early Barrett’s neoplasia using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:839.CrossRefPubMed Swager AF, van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, et al. Computer-aided detection of early Barrett’s neoplasia using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:839.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, Swager A-F, et al. Predictive features for early cancer detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Comput Med Imaging Graphics. 2018;67:9–20.CrossRef van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, Swager A-F, et al. Predictive features for early cancer detection in Barrett’s esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Comput Med Imaging Graphics. 2018;67:9–20.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring Barrett’s Epithelial Thickness with Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy as a Biomarker to Guide Treatment
Authors
I. J. M. Levink
H. C. Wolfsen
P. D. Siersema
M. B. Wallace
G. J. Tearney
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5453-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.