Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Barrett Esophagus | Research

Dutch, UK and US professionals’ perceptions of screening for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a concept mapping study

Authors: Jasmijn Sijben, Linda Rainey, Yonne Peters, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald, Sachin Wani, Jennifer M. Kolb, Mireille J. M. Broeders, Peter D. Siersema

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Novel, less-invasive technologies to screen for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) may enable a paradigm shift in early detection strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Understanding professionals’ perspectives on screening is important to determine how to proceed. We aimed to explore and compare professionals’ perceptions of screening for BE and EAC screening in three countries.

Methods

In this study, 29 Dutch, 20 British and 18 American health care professionals (clinicians, researchers and policy makers) participated in concept mapping: a mixed-methods consensus building methodology. Statements on perceived barriers, facilitators, advantages, disadvantages, implications or worries associated with screening for BE and EAC were collected in asynchronous digital brainstorm sessions. Subsequently, participants sorted the statements into groups according to thematic similarity and assessed the relevance of each statement in evaluating the acceptability of BE and EAC screening. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to map the associations between generated statements.

Results

Professionals across three countries identified eight consistent themes that relate to their perceptions of screening for BE and EAC: (1) Benefits, (2) Harms, (3) Clinical effectiveness concerns, (4) Screening population, (5) Screening modality, (6) Resources, (7) Ownership, and (8) Public communication. Dutch and American professionals prioritized the potential health benefits of screening but also questioned clinical impact. In contrast, British participants prioritized identification of the screening population and suitable test.

Conclusions

Most professionals see potential in less-invasive screening tests for BE and EAC but underline the need to define the target screening population and determine benefits and harms before widely employing them. Successful implementation will require thoughtful consideration of the involvement of general practitioners, readiness of endoscopy and pathology services, balanced public communication, and country-specific regulations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
12.
Metadata
Title
Dutch, UK and US professionals’ perceptions of screening for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a concept mapping study
Authors
Jasmijn Sijben
Linda Rainey
Yonne Peters
Rebecca C. Fitzgerald
Sachin Wani
Jennifer M. Kolb
Mireille J. M. Broeders
Peter D. Siersema
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11583-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine