Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Contributions

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Performed with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb Delivers Weight Loss Outcomes Similar to Those with a 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb at 18 -24 Months

Authors: Maureen Boyle, Kamal Mahawar

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It has been suggested that shortening the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length with one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to 150 cm would reduce the revision rates for malnutrition. But, it remains unclear if this would not compromise the efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

We examined our prospectively maintained database to compare the outcomes of patients who had their OAGB performed with a 150-cm BPL with those performed with a 200-cm BPL.

Results

Medium-term weight loss data at 18–24 months was available for 343/398 (86.1% follow-up) patients. Of these, 225 had undergone OAGB-200 and 118 had undergone OAGB-150. The mean preoperative weight and body mass index were 141.6 ± 32.8 kg and 49.76 ± 8.6 kg/m2, respectively, in the OAGB-200 group compared with 133.7 ± 24.5 kg and 47.83 ± 7.2 kg/m2, respectively, in the OAGB-150 group. There was no significant difference in albumin and haemoglobin levels in the two groups at 18-month follow-up. The mean excess weight loss was 75.0% ± 20.1 in the OAGB-200 group and 74.0% ± 22.0 in the OAGB-150 group (p = 0.6714). A total of 89.7% (n = 202) patients achieved an excess weight loss (EWL) of ≥ 50.0% in the OAGB-200 group compared with 85.5% (n = 103) in the OAGB-150 group (p value = 0.4754). The mean total weight loss was 36.1% ± 9.2 in the OAGB-200 group compared with 34.0% ± 9.8 in the OAGB-150 group (p value = 0.0598).

Conclusions

OAGB performed with a BPL of 150 cm delivers weight loss outcomes similar to that seen with a BPL of 200 cm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.CrossRef De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Parikh M, Eisenberg D, Johnson J, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery review of the literature on one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1088–92.CrossRef Parikh M, Eisenberg D, Johnson J, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery review of the literature on one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1088–92.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maud R, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA) – a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.CrossRef Maud R, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA) – a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.CrossRef Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mahawar KK. Yet another mortality with a biliopancreatic limb of > 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3634–5.CrossRef Mahawar KK. Yet another mortality with a biliopancreatic limb of > 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3634–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mahawar KK. A biliopancreatic limb of >150 cm with OAGB/MGB is ill-advised. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2164–5.CrossRef Mahawar KK. A biliopancreatic limb of >150 cm with OAGB/MGB is ill-advised. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2164–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.CrossRef Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. Reply to: yet another mortality with a bilio-pancreatic limb of > 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3636–7.CrossRef Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. Reply to: yet another mortality with a bilio-pancreatic limb of > 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3636–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Kular KS, Parmar C, et al. Perioperative practices concerning one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of 210 surgeons. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):204–11.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Kular KS, Parmar C, et al. Perioperative practices concerning one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of 210 surgeons. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):204–11.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Parmar C, et al. Small bowel limb lengths and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Parmar C, et al. Small bowel limb lengths and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Müller MK, Räder S, Wildi S, et al. Long-term follow-up of proximal versus distal laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Br J Surg. 2008;95(11):1375–9.CrossRef Müller MK, Räder S, Wildi S, et al. Long-term follow-up of proximal versus distal laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Br J Surg. 2008;95(11):1375–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ruiz-Tovar J, Vorwald P, Gonzalez-Ramirez G, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length (70 cm vs 120 cm), with constant 150 cm alimentary limb, on long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities and supplementation needs after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2367–72.CrossRef Ruiz-Tovar J, Vorwald P, Gonzalez-Ramirez G, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length (70 cm vs 120 cm), with constant 150 cm alimentary limb, on long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities and supplementation needs after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2367–72.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Sharples AJ. Contribution of malabsorption to weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2194–206.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Sharples AJ. Contribution of malabsorption to weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2194–206.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.CrossRef Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference De Luca M, Himpens J, Angrisani L, et al. A new concept in bariatric surgery. Single anastomosis gastro-ileal (SAGI): technical details and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):143–7.CrossRef De Luca M, Himpens J, Angrisani L, et al. A new concept in bariatric surgery. Single anastomosis gastro-ileal (SAGI): technical details and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):143–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Komaei I, Sarra F, Lazzara C, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3062–70.CrossRef Komaei I, Sarra F, Lazzara C, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3062–70.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47(6):1345–51.CrossRef Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47(6):1345–51.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Himpens JM, Vilallonga R, Cadière GB, et al. Metabolic consequences of the incorporation of a roux limb in an omega loop (mini) gastric bypass: evaluation by a glucose tolerance test at mid-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2935–45.CrossRef Himpens JM, Vilallonga R, Cadière GB, et al. Metabolic consequences of the incorporation of a roux limb in an omega loop (mini) gastric bypass: evaluation by a glucose tolerance test at mid-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2935–45.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dogan K, Homan J, Aarts EO, et al. A short or a long Roux limb in gastric bypass surgery: does it matter? Surg Endosc. 2017;31(4):1882–90.CrossRef Dogan K, Homan J, Aarts EO, et al. A short or a long Roux limb in gastric bypass surgery: does it matter? Surg Endosc. 2017;31(4):1882–90.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Risstad H, Svanevik M, Kristinsson JA, et al. Standard vs distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1146–55.CrossRef Risstad H, Svanevik M, Kristinsson JA, et al. Standard vs distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1146–55.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mahawar KK. One anastomosis gastric bypass is a “gastric bypass”. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2786–7.CrossRef Mahawar KK. One anastomosis gastric bypass is a “gastric bypass”. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2786–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gagner M. Is it a single anastomosis gastric bypass or is it a single anastomosis biliopancreatic diversion? Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3295–6.CrossRef Gagner M. Is it a single anastomosis gastric bypass or is it a single anastomosis biliopancreatic diversion? Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3295–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Puzziferri N, Roshek 3rd TB, Mayo HG, et al. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(9):934–42.CrossRef Puzziferri N, Roshek 3rd TB, Mayo HG, et al. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(9):934–42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Performed with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb Delivers Weight Loss Outcomes Similar to Those with a 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb at 18 -24 Months
Authors
Maureen Boyle
Kamal Mahawar
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04359-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Obesity Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue