Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Contributions

Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Adjustable Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Should We Leave the Band in Place?

Authors: Frederik PDM Lecot, Evert-Jan G Boerma, Rochelle Sigterman-Nelissen, Berry Meesters, Sofie Fransen, Jan Willem Greve

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is rapidly becoming a deprecated bariatric procedure due to disappointing weight loss results and a high rate of band intolerance. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a common revisional procedure after failed LAGB. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and risk profile of conversion to adjustable banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ABRYGB).

Methods

A retrospective patient file review of all consecutive laparoscopic conversions of LAGB to ABRYGB 2008–2017. Pre/perioperative data, weight change, and long-/short-term complications were retrieved.

Results

Study population 98 patients. Mean BMI before revision was 40,15 kg/m2. Most revisional procedures were performed for band intolerance and/or weight regain or weight loss failure. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. During follow-up, 16 bands had to be removed due to one of the following reasons: infection, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic peptic perforation, adhesions around the anastomosis, internal hernia around the tubing, adhesions to the tubing, tubing failure, and erosion of the band. Three of those bands were replaced with a non-adjustable Silastic (Minimizer) ring. In total, issues with tubing requiring an intervention were found in 20 patients after conversion to ABRYGB. Seven revisional procedures had to be performed for symptomatic internal hernias not related to the tubing and incidental internal hernias were found in another 7 procedures.

Conclusion

Although conversion of LAGB to ABRYGB is technically feasible, initially well-tolerated, and has good weight loss results, the number of additional procedures during follow-up is rather high, suggesting that leaving the band in place should not be advised.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aarts EO, Dogan K, Koehestanie P, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a mean fourteen year follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):633–40.CrossRef Aarts EO, Dogan K, Koehestanie P, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a mean fourteen year follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):633–40.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arapis K, Tammaro P, Parenti LR, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: 18-year follow-up in a single university unit. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):630–40.CrossRef Arapis K, Tammaro P, Parenti LR, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: 18-year follow-up in a single university unit. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):630–40.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRef O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elnahas A, Urbach D, Lebovic G, et al. The effect of mechanical bowel preparation on anastomotic leaks in elective left-sided colorectal resections. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):793–8.CrossRef Elnahas A, Urbach D, Lebovic G, et al. The effect of mechanical bowel preparation on anastomotic leaks in elective left-sided colorectal resections. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):793–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pujol Rafols J, Abbas Al AI, Devriendt S, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one anastomosis gastric bypass as rescue therapy after failed adjustable gastric banding: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11):1659–66.CrossRef Pujol Rafols J, Abbas Al AI, Devriendt S, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one anastomosis gastric bypass as rescue therapy after failed adjustable gastric banding: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11):1659–66.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fournier P, Gero D, Dayer-Jankechova A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):231–9.CrossRef Fournier P, Gero D, Dayer-Jankechova A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):231–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos KA, et al. Banded vs. non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2018;8(6):424–33.CrossRef Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos KA, et al. Banded vs. non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2018;8(6):424–33.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Uittenbogaart M, Leclercq WK, Luijten AA, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding after failed roux-En-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):381–6.CrossRef Uittenbogaart M, Leclercq WK, Luijten AA, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding after failed roux-En-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):381–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Aminian A, Corcelles R, Daigle CR, et al. Critical appraisal of salvage banding for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):607–11.CrossRef Aminian A, Corcelles R, Daigle CR, et al. Critical appraisal of salvage banding for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):607–11.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB, et al. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg Springer. 2006;16(11):1450–6.CrossRef Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB, et al. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg Springer. 2006;16(11):1450–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vijgen GHEJ, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):803–8.CrossRef Vijgen GHEJ, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):803–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as a revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(10):1443–8.CrossRef Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as a revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(10):1443–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meesters B, Latten G, Timmermans L, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as revisional procedure after gastric banding: leaving the band in place. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):717–22.CrossRef Meesters B, Latten G, Timmermans L, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as revisional procedure after gastric banding: leaving the band in place. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):717–22.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greve JWM, Furbetta F, Lesti G, et al. Combination of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and gastric bypass: current situation and future prospects -- routine use not advised. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):683–9.CrossRef Greve JWM, Furbetta F, Lesti G, et al. Combination of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and gastric bypass: current situation and future prospects -- routine use not advised. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):683–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S, Agrawal S, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable banded roux-en-y gastric bypass as a primary procedure for the super-super-obese (body mass index > 60 kg/m2). BMC Surg. 2010;10:33.CrossRef Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S, Agrawal S, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable banded roux-en-y gastric bypass as a primary procedure for the super-super-obese (body mass index > 60 kg/m2). BMC Surg. 2010;10:33.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chin PL, Ali M, Francis K, et al. Adjustable gastric band placed around gastric bypass pouch as revision operation for failed gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):38–42.CrossRef Chin PL, Ali M, Francis K, et al. Adjustable gastric band placed around gastric bypass pouch as revision operation for failed gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):38–42.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gobble RM, Parikh MS, Greives MR, et al. Gastric banding as a salvage procedure for patients with weight loss failure after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;22(4):1019–22.CrossRef Gobble RM, Parikh MS, Greives MR, et al. Gastric banding as a salvage procedure for patients with weight loss failure after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;22(4):1019–22.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):299–303.CrossRef Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):299–303.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Barsamian C, et al. Similar postoperative safety between primary and revisional gastric bypass for failed gastric banding. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):780–6.CrossRef Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Barsamian C, et al. Similar postoperative safety between primary and revisional gastric bypass for failed gastric banding. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):780–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Geubbels N, Lijftogt N, Fiocco M, et al. Meta-analysis of internal herniation after gastric bypass surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):451–60.CrossRef Geubbels N, Lijftogt N, Fiocco M, et al. Meta-analysis of internal herniation after gastric bypass surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):451–60.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Egberts K, Brown WA, O'Brien PE. Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1272–9.CrossRef Egberts K, Brown WA, O'Brien PE. Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1272–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Obeid NR, Malick W, Concors SJ, et al. Long-term outcomes after roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10- to 13-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):11–20.CrossRef Obeid NR, Malick W, Concors SJ, et al. Long-term outcomes after roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10- to 13-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):11–20.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.CrossRef Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Slegtenhorst BR, van der Harst E, Demirkiran A, et al. Effect of primary versus revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass: inferior weight loss of revisional surgery after gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):253–8.CrossRef Slegtenhorst BR, van der Harst E, Demirkiran A, et al. Effect of primary versus revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass: inferior weight loss of revisional surgery after gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):253–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1536–51.CrossRef Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1536–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Adjustable Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Should We Leave the Band in Place?
Authors
Frederik PDM Lecot
Evert-Jan G Boerma
Rochelle Sigterman-Nelissen
Berry Meesters
Sofie Fransen
Jan Willem Greve
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04106-w

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Obesity Surgery 12/2019 Go to the issue