Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Original Contributions

Comparison of Repeat Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Case of Weight Loss Failure After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Authors: Christos Antonopulos, Lionel Rebibo, Daniela Calabrese, Lara Ribeiro-Parenti, Konstantinos Arapis, Abdennaceur Dhahri, Muriel Coupaye, Boris Hansel, Jean-Pierre Marmuse, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Simon Msika

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few series are available on the results of repeat sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) performed to manage the failure of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of re-SG and RYGB after SG.

Material & Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2017, patients undergoing re-SG (n = 61) and RYGB (n = 83) for failure of primary SG were included in this study. Revisional surgery was proposed for patients with insufficient excess weight loss (EWL ≤ 50%) or weight regain. The primary endpoint was the comparison of weight loss in the re-SG group and the RYGB group at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity, specific morbidity, length of stay, weight loss, and correction of comorbidities.

Results

The mean interval between SG and re-SG was 41.5 vs. 43.2 months between SG and RYGB (p = 0.32). The mean operative time was 103 min (re-SG group) vs. 129.4 min (RYGB group). One death (1.7%; re-SG group) and 25 complications (17.4%; 9 in the re-SG group, 16 in the RYGB group) were observed. At the 1 year, mean body mass index was 31.6 in the re-SG group and 32.5 in the RYGB group (p = 0.61) and excess weight loss was 69.5 vs. 61.2, respectively (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Re-SG and RYGB as revisional surgery for SG are feasible with acceptable outcomes and similar results on weight loss on the first postoperative year.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56–65.CrossRef Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56–65.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lazzati A, Guy-Lachuer R, Delaunay V, et al. Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005-2011. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:328–34.CrossRef Lazzati A, Guy-Lachuer R, Delaunay V, et al. Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005-2011. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:328–34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. The changing bariatric surgery landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1544–6.CrossRef Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. The changing bariatric surgery landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1544–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:469–75.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:469–75.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:264–9.CrossRef Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:264–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1778–86.CrossRef Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1778–86.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1535–8.CrossRef Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1535–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Iannelli A, Debs T, Martini F, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and preliminary results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1533–8.CrossRef Iannelli A, Debs T, Martini F, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and preliminary results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1533–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, et al. Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:771–7.CrossRef Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, et al. Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:771–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:240–5.CrossRef Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:240–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1302–8.CrossRef Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1302–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rebibo L, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, et al. Repeat sleeve gastrectomy compared with primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, matched case study. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1909–15.CrossRef Rebibo L, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, et al. Repeat sleeve gastrectomy compared with primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, matched case study. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1909–15.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nedelcu M, Noel P, Iannelli A, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy (re-sleeve). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1282–8.CrossRef Nedelcu M, Noel P, Iannelli A, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy (re-sleeve). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1282–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Silecchia G, De Angelis F, Rizzello M, et al. Residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2899–903.CrossRef Silecchia G, De Angelis F, Rizzello M, et al. Residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2899–903.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rebibo L, Dhahri A, Robert B, et al. Repeat sleeve gastrectomy: optimization of outcomes by modifying the indications and technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:490–7.CrossRef Rebibo L, Dhahri A, Robert B, et al. Repeat sleeve gastrectomy: optimization of outcomes by modifying the indications and technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:490–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Quezada N, Hernández J, Pérez G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: experience in 50 patients after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1611–5.CrossRef Quezada N, Hernández J, Pérez G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: experience in 50 patients after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1611–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Malinka T, Zerkowski J, Katharina I, et al. Three-year outcomes of revisional laparoscopic gastric bypass after failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2324–30.CrossRef Malinka T, Zerkowski J, Katharina I, et al. Three-year outcomes of revisional laparoscopic gastric bypass after failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2324–30.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is effective for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but not for further weight loss. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1651–8.CrossRef Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is effective for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but not for further weight loss. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1651–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Al-Sabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A et al. Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve vs. gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2016; 26:2302–2307.CrossRef Al-Sabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A et al. Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve vs. gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2016; 26:2302–2307.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Deguines JB, Verhaeghe P, Yzet T, et al. Is the residual gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an objective criterion for adapting the treatment strategy after failure? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:660–6.CrossRef Deguines JB, Verhaeghe P, Yzet T, et al. Is the residual gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an objective criterion for adapting the treatment strategy after failure? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:660–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gagner M. Is sleeve gastrectomy always an absolute contraindication in patients with Barrett’s? Obes Surg. 2016;26:715–7.CrossRef Gagner M. Is sleeve gastrectomy always an absolute contraindication in patients with Barrett’s? Obes Surg. 2016;26:715–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chang DM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Thirteen-year experience of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical risk, weight loss, and revision procedures. Obes Surg. 2018 Jun 21. Chang DM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Thirteen-year experience of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical risk, weight loss, and revision procedures. Obes Surg. 2018 Jun 21.
24.
go back to reference Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, et al. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:741–7.CrossRef Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, et al. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:741–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G. Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:693–9.CrossRef Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G. Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:693–9.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:259–63.CrossRef English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:259–63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.CrossRef Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Poghosyan T, Lazzati A, Moszkowicz D, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an audit of 34 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1646–51.CrossRef Poghosyan T, Lazzati A, Moszkowicz D, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an audit of 34 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1646–51.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Wierdak M, et al. Revisional gastric bypass is inferior to primary gastric bypass in terms of short- and long-term outcomes-systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2083–91.CrossRef Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Wierdak M, et al. Revisional gastric bypass is inferior to primary gastric bypass in terms of short- and long-term outcomes-systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2083–91.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zak Y, Petrusa E, Gee DW. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients have an increased lifetime risk of repeat operations when compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1833–8.CrossRef Zak Y, Petrusa E, Gee DW. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients have an increased lifetime risk of repeat operations when compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1833–8.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nevo N, Abu-Abeid S, Lahat G, et al. Converting a sleeve gastrectomy to a gastric bypass for weight loss failure—is it worth it? Obes Surg. 2018;28:364–8.CrossRef Nevo N, Abu-Abeid S, Lahat G, et al. Converting a sleeve gastrectomy to a gastric bypass for weight loss failure—is it worth it? Obes Surg. 2018;28:364–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Repeat Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Case of Weight Loss Failure After Sleeve Gastrectomy
Authors
Christos Antonopulos
Lionel Rebibo
Daniela Calabrese
Lara Ribeiro-Parenti
Konstantinos Arapis
Abdennaceur Dhahri
Muriel Coupaye
Boris Hansel
Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Simon Msika
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04123-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Obesity Surgery 12/2019 Go to the issue