Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Breast

Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response

Authors: H. Preibsch, L. Wanner, S. D. Bahrs, B. M. Wietek, K. C. Siegmann-Luz, E. Oberlecher, M. Hahn, A. Staebler, K. Nikolaou, B. Wiesinger

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To correlate the decrease in background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and tumour response measured with MRI in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods

One hundred and forty-six MRI examinations of 73 patients with 80 biopsy-proven breast cancers who underwent breast MRI before and after NAC were retrospectively analysed. All images were reviewed by two blinded readers, who classified BPE into categories (BEC; 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked) before and after NAC. Histopathological and morphological tumour responses were analysed and compared.

Results

The distribution of BEC 1/2/3/4 was 25/46/18/11 % before and 78/20/2/0 % after NAC. On average, BPE decreased by 0.87 BEC. Cohen’s kappa showed substantial agreement (k = 0.73–0.77) before and moderate agreement (k = 0.43–0.60) after NAC and moderate agreement (k = 0.62–0.60) concerning the change in BEC. Correlating the change in BPE with tumour response, the average decrease in BEC was 1.3 in cases of complete remission, 0.83 in cases with partial response, 0.85 in cases with stable disease and 0.40 in cases with progressive disease. Correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the decrease in BEC and tumour response (r = −0.24, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

BPE decreased by, on average, 0.87 BEC following NAC for breast cancer. The degree of BPE reduction seemed to correlate with tumour response.

Key Points

• BPE decreases by an average of 0.87 categories under neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
• The reduction of BPE following neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlates with the tumour response.
• The classification of the BPE shows good agreement among trained readers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris E, Comstock C, Lee C, et al (2013) Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology Morris E, Comstock C, Lee C, et al (2013) Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology
2.
go back to reference Hansen NL, Kuhl CK, Barabasch A, Strobel K, Schrading S (2014) Does MRI Breast “Density” (Degree of Background Enhancement) Correlate With Mammographic Breast Density? J Magn Reson Imaging 40:483–489CrossRefPubMed Hansen NL, Kuhl CK, Barabasch A, Strobel K, Schrading S (2014) Does MRI Breast “Density” (Degree of Background Enhancement) Correlate With Mammographic Breast Density? J Magn Reson Imaging 40:483–489CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cubuk R, Tasali N, Narin B, Keskiner F, Celik L, Guney S (2010) Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. Radiol Med 115:434–441CrossRefPubMed Cubuk R, Tasali N, Narin B, Keskiner F, Celik L, Guney S (2010) Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. Radiol Med 115:434–441CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, Brooks JD, Pike MC, Morris EA (2012) Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Eur Radiol 22:2641–2647CrossRefPubMed King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, Brooks JD, Pike MC, Morris EA (2012) Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Eur Radiol 22:2641–2647CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD (1997) Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 203:145–149CrossRefPubMed Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD (1997) Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 203:145–149CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J et al (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203:137–144CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J et al (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203:137–144CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Baek JE, Kim SH, Lee AW (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRIs of breast cancer patients: Impact on tumor size estimation. Eur J Radiol 83:1356–1362CrossRefPubMed Baek JE, Kim SH, Lee AW (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRIs of breast cancer patients: Impact on tumor size estimation. Eur J Radiol 83:1356–1362CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J (2011) Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267CrossRefPubMed Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J (2011) Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Park SY, Kang DK, Kim TH (2015) Does background parenchymal enhancement on MRI affect the rate of positive resection margin in breast cancer patients? Br J Radiol 88:20140638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park SY, Kang DK, Kim TH (2015) Does background parenchymal enhancement on MRI affect the rate of positive resection margin in breast cancer patients? Br J Radiol 88:20140638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YJ et al (2015) Enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: do they correlate with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers? Magn Reson Imaging 33:72–80CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YJ et al (2015) Enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: do they correlate with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers? Magn Reson Imaging 33:72–80CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim S-A, Cho N, Ryu EB et al (2013) Background Parenchymal Signal Enhancement Ratio at Preoperative MR Imaging: Association with Subsequent Local Recurrence in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conservation Surgery. Radiology 270:699–707CrossRefPubMed Kim S-A, Cho N, Ryu EB et al (2013) Background Parenchymal Signal Enhancement Ratio at Preoperative MR Imaging: Association with Subsequent Local Recurrence in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conservation Surgery. Radiology 270:699–707CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference DeLeo MJ 3rd, Domchek SM, Kontos D, Conant E, Chen J, Weinstein S (2015) Breast MRI fibroglandular volume and parenchymal enhancement in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers before and immediately after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:669–673CrossRefPubMed DeLeo MJ 3rd, Domchek SM, Kontos D, Conant E, Chen J, Weinstein S (2015) Breast MRI fibroglandular volume and parenchymal enhancement in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers before and immediately after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:669–673CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Kim SH, Choi BG et al (2014) Impact of radiotherapy on background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15:2939–2943CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Kim SH, Choi BG et al (2014) Impact of radiotherapy on background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15:2939–2943CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen JH, Yu HJ, Hsu C, Mehta RS, Carpenter PM, Su MY (2015) Background Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Normal Breast: Association with Tumor Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Transl Oncol 8:204–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen JH, Yu HJ, Hsu C, Mehta RS, Carpenter PM, Su MY (2015) Background Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Normal Breast: Association with Tumor Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Transl Oncol 8:204–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference King V, Goldfarb SB, Brooks JD et al (2012) Effect of aromatase inhibitors on background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue at breast MR imaging. Radiology 264:670–678CrossRefPubMed King V, Goldfarb SB, Brooks JD et al (2012) Effect of aromatase inhibitors on background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue at breast MR imaging. Radiology 264:670–678CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference King V, Kaplan J, Pike MC et al (2012) Impact of tamoxifen on amount of fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement, and cysts on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 18:527–534CrossRefPubMed King V, Kaplan J, Pike MC et al (2012) Impact of tamoxifen on amount of fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement, and cysts on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 18:527–534CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schrading S, Schild H, Kuhr M, Kuhl C (2014) Effects of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors on breast tissue enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: a longitudinal intraindividual cohort study. Radiology 271:45–55CrossRefPubMed Schrading S, Schild H, Kuhr M, Kuhl C (2014) Effects of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors on breast tissue enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: a longitudinal intraindividual cohort study. Radiology 271:45–55CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. RadioGraphics 34:234–247CrossRefPubMed Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. RadioGraphics 34:234–247CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jansen SA, Lin VC, Giger ML, Li H, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM (2011) Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Eur Radiol 21:1374–1382CrossRefPubMed Jansen SA, Lin VC, Giger ML, Li H, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM (2011) Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Eur Radiol 21:1374–1382CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J (2012) Background enhancement of mammary glandular tissue on breast dynamic MRI: imaging features and effect on assessment of breast cancer extent. Breast Cancer 19:259–265CrossRefPubMed Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J (2012) Background enhancement of mammary glandular tissue on breast dynamic MRI: imaging features and effect on assessment of breast cancer extent. Breast Cancer 19:259–265CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Melsaether A, McDermott M, Gupta D, Pysarenko K, Shaylor SD, Moy L (2014) Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:209–215CrossRefPubMed Melsaether A, McDermott M, Gupta D, Pysarenko K, Shaylor SD, Moy L (2014) Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:209–215CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Edwards SD, Lipson JA, Ikeda DM, Lee JM (2013) Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:483–493CrossRefPubMed Edwards SD, Lipson JA, Ikeda DM, Lee JM (2013) Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:483–493CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dontchos BN, Rahbar H, Partridge SC et al (2015) Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk? Radiology 276:371–380CrossRefPubMed Dontchos BN, Rahbar H, Partridge SC et al (2015) Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk? Radiology 276:371–380CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference van der Velden BH, Dmitriev I, Loo CE, Pijnappel RM, Gilhuijs KG (2015) Association between Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Breast in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Outcome of Patients with Unilateral Invasive Breast Cancer. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.15142192:142192 PubMed van der Velden BH, Dmitriev I, Loo CE, Pijnappel RM, Gilhuijs KG (2015) Association between Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Breast in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Outcome of Patients with Unilateral Invasive Breast Cancer. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​15142192:​142192 PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hattangadi J, Park C, Rembert J et al (2008) Breast stromal enhancement on MRI is associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1630–1636CrossRefPubMed Hattangadi J, Park C, Rembert J et al (2008) Breast stromal enhancement on MRI is associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1630–1636CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response
Authors
H. Preibsch
L. Wanner
S. D. Bahrs
B. M. Wietek
K. C. Siegmann-Luz
E. Oberlecher
M. Hahn
A. Staebler
K. Nikolaou
B. Wiesinger
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4011-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

European Radiology 6/2016 Go to the issue