Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Reply

Author’s Reply to Proost: “Challenges in Individualizing Drug Dosage for Intensive Care Unit Patients”

Author: Roger W. Jelliffe

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

I refer to the comments by Dr. Proost [1] on my paper published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics in August 2016 [2]. Dr. Proost says that I use an “incorrect approach” to pharmacokinetics, and that my conclusions “might have been different if I had used the correct approach.” He also makes many other assertions, several of which have significant clinical implications, so there is a lot to discuss, even after omitting several points. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Proost JH. Comment on: "Challenges in individualizing drug dosage for intensive care unit patients". [letter]. Clin Pharmacokinet. Proost JH. Comment on: "Challenges in individualizing drug dosage for intensive care unit patients". [letter]. Clin Pharmacokinet.
2.
go back to reference Jelliffe R. Challenges in individualizing drug dosage for intensive care unit patients: is augmented renal clearance what we really want to know? Some suggested management approaches and clinical software tools. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(8):897–905. doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0369-4.CrossRefPubMed Jelliffe R. Challenges in individualizing drug dosage for intensive care unit patients: is augmented renal clearance what we really want to know? Some suggested management approaches and clinical software tools. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(8):897–905. doi:10.​1007/​s40262-016-0369-4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference D’Argenio D. Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmacol. 1981;9:739–56.CrossRef D’Argenio D. Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmacol. 1981;9:739–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jelliffe R, Bayard D, Neely M. MMopt—an optimal TDM protocol strategy based on Bayes risk and weighted Bayes risk [oral presentation]. In: 14th congress of the international Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, 14 Oct 2015, Rotterdam. Jelliffe R, Bayard D, Neely M. MMopt—an optimal TDM protocol strategy based on Bayes risk and weighted Bayes risk [oral presentation]. In: 14th congress of the international Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, 14 Oct 2015, Rotterdam.
6.
go back to reference Bayard D, Jelliffe R. A Bayesian approach to tracking patients having changing pharmacokinetic parameters. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2004;31(1):75–107.CrossRefPubMed Bayard D, Jelliffe R. A Bayesian approach to tracking patients having changing pharmacokinetic parameters. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2004;31(1):75–107.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Blom HAP. An efficient filter for abruptly changing systems [abstract]. In: 23rd IEEE conference on decision and control, 12–14 Dec 1984, Las Vegas. Blom HAP. An efficient filter for abruptly changing systems [abstract]. In: 23rd IEEE conference on decision and control, 12–14 Dec 1984, Las Vegas.
8.
go back to reference Blom HAP, Bar-Shalom Y. The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficients. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1988;33:780–3.CrossRef Blom HAP, Bar-Shalom Y. The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficients. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1988;33:780–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Macdonald I, Staatz C, Jelliffe R, Thomson A. Evaluation and comparison of simple multiple model, richer data multiple model, and sequential interacting multiple model (IMM) Bayesian analyses of gentamicin and vancomycin data collected from patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30:67–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Macdonald I, Staatz C, Jelliffe R, Thomson A. Evaluation and comparison of simple multiple model, richer data multiple model, and sequential interacting multiple model (IMM) Bayesian analyses of gentamicin and vancomycin data collected from patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30:67–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Jelliffe R. Estimation of creatinine clearance in patients with unstable renal function, without a urine specimen. Am J Nephrol. 2002;22:320–4.CrossRefPubMed Jelliffe R. Estimation of creatinine clearance in patients with unstable renal function, without a urine specimen. Am J Nephrol. 2002;22:320–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Goodwin G, Payne R. Dynamic system identification: experiment design and data analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1977. p. 50 (Theorem 3.4.1). Goodwin G, Payne R. Dynamic system identification: experiment design and data analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1977. p. 50 (Theorem 3.4.1).
13.
go back to reference Rowland M, Benet L, Graham G. Clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1973;1(2):123–36.CrossRefPubMed Rowland M, Benet L, Graham G. Clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1973;1(2):123–36.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mehvar R. The relationship among pharmacokinetic parameters: effects of altered kinetics on the drug plasma concentration-time profiles. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(2):1–9. Mehvar R. The relationship among pharmacokinetic parameters: effects of altered kinetics on the drug plasma concentration-time profiles. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(2):1–9.
15.
go back to reference Jelliffe R, Neely M, editors. Individualized drug therapy for patients: basic foundations, relevant software and clinical applications. 1st ed. Elsevier. Jelliffe R, Neely M, editors. Individualized drug therapy for patients: basic foundations, relevant software and clinical applications. 1st ed. Elsevier.
Metadata
Title
Author’s Reply to Proost: “Challenges in Individualizing Drug Dosage for Intensive Care Unit Patients”
Author
Roger W. Jelliffe
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0482-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2017 Go to the issue