Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Research Article

A Strategy for Dosing Vancomycin to Therapeutic Targets Using Only Trough Concentrations

Author: John P. Prybylski

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Effective treatment of complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with vancomycin requires a 24-h area under the concentration–time curve (AUC24) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of at least 400. To ensure goal AUC24 has been reached requires either dosing to concentrations strongly associated with nephrotoxicity, measurement of patient-specific pharmacokinetics, or use of Bayesian statistics. In this study, we show a method of determining patient-specific pharmacokinetics and dosing to therapeutic AUC24 while minimizing potentially toxic concentrations, guided by only trough measurements. A Monte–Carlo simulation of 10,000 patients with complicated MRSA infections was prepared from two-compartment pharmacokinetic parameters using patient data extracted from the literature. The proposed method of determining patient-specific pharmacokinetics using consecutive trough concentrations was found to be more accurate than the conventional peak-trough method for peaks measured up to 4 h after infusion. Simulated human error in trough timing was found to reduce accuracy of the consecutive trough method, but an approach to resolve timing errors during a loading sequence or at steady-state using iteration is proposed. Both the simulated minimized concentration strategy and trough-based dosing to 15–20 mg/L had a high probability of achieving AUC24 at least 400 mg·h/L, but conventional trough-based dosing was associated with higher probability of potentially toxic 24-h doses and trough concentrations. The proposed strategy must be validated in real patients, with outcomes assessed before it is used in daily practice, but the theoretical benefits found in the simulation suggest this simple strategy should be considered with other AUC24-based approaches.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yahav D, Yassin S, Shaked H, Goldberg E, Bishara J, Paul M, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(5):785–9.CrossRefPubMed Yahav D, Yassin S, Shaked H, Goldberg E, Bishara J, Paul M, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(5):785–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Antonanzas F, Lozano C, Torres C. Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(4):285–325.CrossRefPubMed Antonanzas F, Lozano C, Torres C. Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(4):285–325.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van Hal SJ, Fowler VG. Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections? Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1779–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Hal SJ, Fowler VG. Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections? Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1779–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:35–9.CrossRef Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:35–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:925–42.CrossRefPubMed Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:925–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Larsson AJ, Walker KJ, Raddatz JK, Rotschafer JC. The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:589–97.CrossRefPubMed Larsson AJ, Walker KJ, Raddatz JK, Rotschafer JC. The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:589–97.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Prybylski JP. Vancomycin trough concentration as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:889–98.CrossRefPubMed Prybylski JP. Vancomycin trough concentration as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:889–98.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rybak MJ, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.CrossRefPubMed Rybak MJ, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e18–55.CrossRefPubMed Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e18–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Neely MN, Youn G, Jones B, Jelliffe RW, Drusano GL, Rodvold KA, et al. Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:309–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neely MN, Youn G, Jones B, Jelliffe RW, Drusano GL, Rodvold KA, et al. Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:309–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:388–416.CrossRef American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:388–416.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lodise TP, Lomaestro B, Graves J, Drusano GL. Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1330–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lodise TP, Lomaestro B, Graves J, Drusano GL. Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1330–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kullar R, Davis SL, Taylor TN, Kaye KS, Rybak MJ. Effects of targeting higher vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes and costs in a matched patient cohort. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32:195–201.CrossRefPubMed Kullar R, Davis SL, Taylor TN, Kaye KS, Rybak MJ. Effects of targeting higher vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes and costs in a matched patient cohort. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32:195–201.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kullar R, Leonard SN, Davis SL, Delgado G, Pogue JM, Wahby KA, et al. Validation of the effectiveness of a vancomycin nomogram in achieving target trough concentrations of 15–20 mg/L suggested by the vancomycin consensus guidelines. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:441–8.CrossRefPubMed Kullar R, Leonard SN, Davis SL, Delgado G, Pogue JM, Wahby KA, et al. Validation of the effectiveness of a vancomycin nomogram in achieving target trough concentrations of 15–20 mg/L suggested by the vancomycin consensus guidelines. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:441–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Steinmetz T, Eliakim-Raz N, Goldberg E, Leibovici L, Yahav D. Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with efficacy in patients with MRSA infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:665–73.CrossRefPubMed Steinmetz T, Eliakim-Raz N, Goldberg E, Leibovici L, Yahav D. Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with efficacy in patients with MRSA infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:665–73.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Meng L, Fang Y, Chen Y, Zhu H, Long R. High versus low vancomycin serum trough regimen for gram-positive infections: a meta-analysis. J Chemother. 2015;27:213–20.CrossRefPubMed Meng L, Fang Y, Chen Y, Zhu H, Long R. High versus low vancomycin serum trough regimen for gram-positive infections: a meta-analysis. J Chemother. 2015;27:213–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:734–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:734–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Pai MP, Neely M, Rodvold KA, Lodise TP. Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;77:50–7.CrossRefPubMed Pai MP, Neely M, Rodvold KA, Lodise TP. Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;77:50–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rotschafer JC, Crossley K, Zaske DE, Mead K, Sawchuk RJ, Solem LD. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin: observations in 28 patients and dosage recommendations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:391–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rotschafer JC, Crossley K, Zaske DE, Mead K, Sawchuk RJ, Solem LD. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin: observations in 28 patients and dosage recommendations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:391–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002. Adv Data. 2004;347:1–17. Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002. Adv Data. 2004;347:1–17.
22.
go back to reference Ducharme RL, Slaughter DE. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in a patient population: effect of age, gender, and body weight. Ther Drug Monit. 1994;16:513–8.CrossRefPubMed Ducharme RL, Slaughter DE. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in a patient population: effect of age, gender, and body weight. Ther Drug Monit. 1994;16:513–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rodvold K, Blum R, Fischer JH, Zokufa HZ, Rotschafer JC, Crossley KB, et al. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:848–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rodvold K, Blum R, Fischer JH, Zokufa HZ, Rotschafer JC, Crossley KB, et al. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:848–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Ambrose PJ, Winter ME. Vancomycin. In: Winter ME, editor. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 451–76. Ambrose PJ, Winter ME. Vancomycin. In: Winter ME, editor. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 451–76.
25.
go back to reference Davis SL, Scheetz MH, Bosso J, Goff D, Rybak MJ. Adherence to the 2009 consensus guidelines for vancomycin dosing and monitoring practices: a cross-sectional survey of U.S. hospitals. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:1256–63.CrossRefPubMed Davis SL, Scheetz MH, Bosso J, Goff D, Rybak MJ. Adherence to the 2009 consensus guidelines for vancomycin dosing and monitoring practices: a cross-sectional survey of U.S. hospitals. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:1256–63.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Brown DL, Lalla CD, Masselink AJ. AUC versus peak–trough dosing of vancomycin: applying new pharmacokinetic paradigms to an old drug. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35:443–9.CrossRefPubMed Brown DL, Lalla CD, Masselink AJ. AUC versus peak–trough dosing of vancomycin: applying new pharmacokinetic paradigms to an old drug. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35:443–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pai MP, Russo A, Novelli A, Venditti M, Falcone M. Simplified equations using two concentrations to calculate area under the curve for antimicrobials with concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics: daptomycin as a motivating example. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3162–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pai MP, Russo A, Novelli A, Venditti M, Falcone M. Simplified equations using two concentrations to calculate area under the curve for antimicrobials with concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics: daptomycin as a motivating example. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3162–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Brater DC, Bawdon RE, Anderson SA, Purdue GF, Hunt JL. Vancomycin elimination in patients with burn injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986;39:631–4.CrossRefPubMed Brater DC, Bawdon RE, Anderson SA, Purdue GF, Hunt JL. Vancomycin elimination in patients with burn injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986;39:631–4.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Richter SS, Diekema DJ, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Crispell EK, Riahi F, et al. Activities of vancomycin, ceftaroline, and mupirocin against Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in a 2011 national surveillance study in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:740–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richter SS, Diekema DJ, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Crispell EK, Riahi F, et al. Activities of vancomycin, ceftaroline, and mupirocin against Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in a 2011 national surveillance study in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:740–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Edwards B, Milne K, Lawes T, Cook I, Robb A, Gould IM. Is vancomycin MIC “creep” method dependent? Analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility trends in blood isolates from North East Scotland from 2006 to 2010. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:318–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards B, Milne K, Lawes T, Cook I, Robb A, Gould IM. Is vancomycin MIC “creep” method dependent? Analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility trends in blood isolates from North East Scotland from 2006 to 2010. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:318–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A Strategy for Dosing Vancomycin to Therapeutic Targets Using Only Trough Concentrations
Author
John P. Prybylski
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0435-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2017 Go to the issue