Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nutrition 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Australian parents’ perceptions of factors that influence their children’s pork consumption: an exploratory qualitative study

Authors: Elizabeth P. Neale, Deborah J. Nolan-Clark, Karen E. Charlton

Published in: BMC Nutrition | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pork provides key nutrients such as protein, thiamin and selenium, however fresh pork is not commonly included in the diets of Australian children, with processed pork preferred. Current dietary guidelines emphasise the consumption of fresh meat in preference to processed meat, and childhood eating habits are likely to persist throughout the lifespan. Investigation of factors influencing children’s pork consumption is therefore warranted. The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate parents’ perceptions of factors that affect their children’s consumption of pork and to identify barriers to the intake of fresh pork, in particular.

Methods

Six semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with n = 31 parents or carers of children aged 2 to 16 years. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically according to the framework analysis technique and using NVivo qualitative analysis software. Key themes and sub-themes were identified, and exemplar quotes for each theme were identified.

Results

A number of key themes emerged during the focus groups, namely: a lack of confidence and knowledge relating to the preparation and cooking of fresh pork, poor acceptability of fresh pork by some children due to taste and texture and the influence of family and cultural traditions on pork consumption. Parents reported an overall perception that fresh pork was a healthy meat, but a low visibility of pork in shopping outlets and limited advertising restricted its uptake. Participants discussed a need for pork recipes and cooking instruction to build confidence in their ability to prepare fresh pork dishes.

Conclusions

This exploratory qualitative study is the first to explore factors influencing children’s pork consumption and has provided key insights into children’s eating behaviour in relation to pork. These factors may inform targeted dietetic strategies, including recipe development and the provision of information on nutrient composition and cooking strategies, to encourage dietary diversity regarding meat choices for families with young children.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing, National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian dietary guidelines. 2013. Department of Health and Ageing, National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian dietary guidelines. 2013.
2.
go back to reference World Cancer Research Fund. Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. 2007. World Cancer Research Fund. Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. 2007.
3.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient reference values for Australia and New Zealand including recommended dietary intakes. 2006. National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient reference values for Australia and New Zealand including recommended dietary intakes. 2006.
5.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Food and Grocery Council, Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry. 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey - Main Findings. Canberra 2009. Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Food and Grocery Council, Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry. 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey - Main Findings. Canberra 2009.
7.
8.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.007—Australian Health Survey: nutrition first results—foods and nutrients, 2011–12. Canberra 2014. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.007—Australian Health Survey: nutrition first results—foods and nutrients, 2011–12. Canberra 2014.
11.
go back to reference Mikkila V, Rasanen L, Raitakari OT, Pietinen P, Viikari J. Longitudinal changes in diet from childhood into adulthood with respect to risk of cardiovascular diseases: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(7):1038–45.CrossRefPubMed Mikkila V, Rasanen L, Raitakari OT, Pietinen P, Viikari J. Longitudinal changes in diet from childhood into adulthood with respect to risk of cardiovascular diseases: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(7):1038–45.CrossRefPubMed
16.
18.
go back to reference Bredahl L, Poulsen C. Perceptions of pork and modern pig breeding among Danish consumers. The Aarhus School of Business. 2002; Project paper no. 01/02. Bredahl L, Poulsen C. Perceptions of pork and modern pig breeding among Danish consumers. The Aarhus School of Business. 2002; Project paper no. 01/02.
20.
go back to reference Wong LP. Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(3):256–60.PubMed Wong LP. Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(3):256–60.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. California: Sage Publications Inc.; 2015. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. California: Sage Publications Inc.; 2015.
22.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, O’Connor G. Analysis: practices, principles and processes. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J, O’Connor G. Analysis: practices, principles and processes. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
23.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Byman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data London: Routledge. 1994. p. 173–95.CrossRef Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Byman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data London: Routledge. 1994. p. 173–95.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Walker O, Strong M, Atchinson R, Saunders J, Abbott J. A qualitative study of primary care clinicians’ views of treating childhood obesity. BMC Family Practice. 2007;8. doi:5010.1186/1471-2296-8-50. Walker O, Strong M, Atchinson R, Saunders J, Abbott J. A qualitative study of primary care clinicians’ views of treating childhood obesity. BMC Family Practice. 2007;8. doi:5010.​1186/​1471-2296-8-50.
31.
go back to reference Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1998;101(3):539–49.PubMed Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1998;101(3):539–49.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s food and nutrition 2012. Canberra 2012: AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s food and nutrition 2012. Canberra 2012: AIHW.
35.
go back to reference Birch LL, Marlin DW. I don’t like it, I never tried it: effects of exposure on two-year-old children’s food preferences. Appetite. 1982;3(4):353–60.CrossRefPubMed Birch LL, Marlin DW. I don’t like it, I never tried it: effects of exposure on two-year-old children’s food preferences. Appetite. 1982;3(4):353–60.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Probst Y. Nutrient Composition of Chicken Meat 2009 Contract No.: RIRDC Publication No 08/210. Probst Y. Nutrient Composition of Chicken Meat 2009 Contract No.: RIRDC Publication No 08/210.
40.
go back to reference Williams P, Droulez V, Levy G, Stobaus T. Composition of Australian red meat 2002–3. Nutrient profile. Food Australia. 2007;59(7):331–41. Williams P, Droulez V, Levy G, Stobaus T. Composition of Australian red meat 2002–3. Nutrient profile. Food Australia. 2007;59(7):331–41.
41.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1379.0.55.001 - National Regional Profile, 2008 to 2012. Canberra 2014. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1379.0.55.001 - National Regional Profile, 2008 to 2012. Canberra 2014.
Metadata
Title
Australian parents’ perceptions of factors that influence their children’s pork consumption: an exploratory qualitative study
Authors
Elizabeth P. Neale
Deborah J. Nolan-Clark
Karen E. Charlton
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nutrition / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2055-0928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-015-0007-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Nutrition 1/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine