Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research Article

Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated

Authors: Patrick Royston, Mahesh K.B. Parmar

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Most randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome are designed assuming proportional hazards (PH) of the treatment effect. The sample size calculation is based on a logrank test. However, non-proportional hazards are increasingly common. At analysis, the estimated hazards ratio with a confidence interval is usually presented. The estimate is often obtained from a Cox PH model with treatment as a covariate. If non-proportional hazards are present, the logrank and equivalent Cox tests may lose power. To safeguard power, we previously suggested a ‘joint test’ combining the Cox test with a test of non-proportional hazards. Unfortunately, a larger sample size is needed to preserve power under PH. Here, we describe a novel test that unites the Cox test with a permutation test based on restricted mean survival time.

Methods

We propose a combined hypothesis test based on a permutation test of the difference in restricted mean survival time across time. The test involves the minimum of the Cox and permutation test P-values. We approximate its null distribution and correct it for correlation between the two P-values. Using extensive simulations, we assess the type 1 error and power of the combined test under several scenarios and compare with other tests. We investigate powering a trial using the combined test.

Results

The type 1 error of the combined test is close to nominal. Power under proportional hazards is slightly lower than for the Cox test. Enhanced power is available when the treatment difference shows an ‘early effect’, an initial separation of survival curves which diminishes over time. The power is reduced under a ‘late effect’, when little or no difference in survival curves is seen for an initial period and then a late separation occurs. We propose a method of powering a trial using the combined test. The ‘insurance premium’ offered by the combined test to safeguard power under non-PH represents about a single-digit percentage increase in sample size.

Conclusions

The combined test increases trial power under an early treatment effect and protects power under other scenarios. Use of restricted mean survival time facilitates testing and displaying a generalized treatment effect.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Schemper M, Wakounig S, Heinze G. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression. Stat Med. 2009; 28:2473–89.CrossRefPubMed Schemper M, Wakounig S, Heinze G. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression. Stat Med. 2009; 28:2473–89.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994; 81:515–26.CrossRef Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994; 81:515–26.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Royston P, Parmar MKB. The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt. Stat Med. 2011; 30:2409–21.CrossRefPubMed Royston P, Parmar MKB. The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt. Stat Med. 2011; 30:2409–21.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Irwin JO. The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice. J Hyg. 1949; 47:188–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Irwin JO. The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice. J Hyg. 1949; 47:188–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP. Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations. Lifetime Data Anal. 2005; 10:335–50.CrossRef Andersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP. Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations. Lifetime Data Anal. 2005; 10:335–50.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parner ET, Andersen PK. Regression analysis of censored data using pseudo-observations. Stata J. 2010; 10:408–22. Parner ET, Andersen PK. Regression analysis of censored data using pseudo-observations. Stata J. 2010; 10:408–22.
8.
go back to reference Overgaard M, Andersen PK, Parner ET. Regression analysis of censored data using pseudo-observations: an update. Stata J. 2015; 15:809–21. Overgaard M, Andersen PK, Parner ET. Regression analysis of censored data using pseudo-observations: an update. Stata J. 2015; 15:809–21.
9.
go back to reference Klein JP, Gerster M, Andersen PK, Tarima S, Perme MP. SAS and R functions to compute pseudo-values for censored data regression. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2008; 89:289–300.CrossRef Klein JP, Gerster M, Andersen PK, Tarima S, Perme MP. SAS and R functions to compute pseudo-values for censored data regression. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2008; 89:289–300.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, et al.Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1–6.CrossRefPubMed McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, et al.Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thomas KS. others for the PATCH1 Trial Team. Penicillin to prevent recurrent leg cellulitis. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:1695–703.CrossRefPubMed Thomas KS. others for the PATCH1 Trial Team. Penicillin to prevent recurrent leg cellulitis. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:1695–703.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Perren TJ. others for the ICON7 Investigators. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2484–96.CrossRefPubMed Perren TJ. others for the ICON7 Investigators. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2484–96.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Winnett A, Sasieni P. Iterated residuals and time-varying covariate effects in Cox regression. J R Stat Soc Series B. 2003; 65:473–88.CrossRef Winnett A, Sasieni P. Iterated residuals and time-varying covariate effects in Cox regression. J R Stat Soc Series B. 2003; 65:473–88.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al.Effect of coronary artery bypass graft on survival: overview of ten-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994; 344:563–70.CrossRefPubMed Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al.Effect of coronary artery bypass graft on survival: overview of ten-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994; 344:563–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Perme MP. Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010; 19:71–99.CrossRefPubMed Andersen PK, Perme MP. Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010; 19:71–99.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Royston P. Tools to simulate realistic censored survival-time distributions. Stata J. 2012; 12:639–54. Royston P. Tools to simulate realistic censored survival-time distributions. Stata J. 2012; 12:639–54.
17.
go back to reference Barthel FMS, Royston P, Babiker A. A menu-driven facility for complex sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials with a survival or a binary outcome: update. Stata J. 2005; 5:123–9. Barthel FMS, Royston P, Babiker A. A menu-driven facility for complex sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials with a survival or a binary outcome: update. Stata J. 2005; 5:123–9.
18.
go back to reference Barthel FMS, Babiker A, Royston P, Parmar MKB. Evaluation of sample size and power for multi-arm survival trials allowing for non-uniform accrual, non-proportional hazards, loss to follow-up and cross-over. Stat Med. 2006; 25:2521–42.CrossRefPubMed Barthel FMS, Babiker A, Royston P, Parmar MKB. Evaluation of sample size and power for multi-arm survival trials allowing for non-uniform accrual, non-proportional hazards, loss to follow-up and cross-over. Stat Med. 2006; 25:2521–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harrington DP, Fleming TR. A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika. 1982; 69:553–66.CrossRef Harrington DP, Fleming TR. A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika. 1982; 69:553–66.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tarone RE, Ware J. On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika. 1977; 64:156–60.CrossRef Tarone RE, Ware J. On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika. 1977; 64:156–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated
Authors
Patrick Royston
Mahesh K.B. Parmar
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016 Go to the issue