Top

Supportive Care in Cancer

Published in:

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives

Authors: Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Phyllis Butow, Stella Bu, Alana Fisher, Ilona Juraskova

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2016

Abstract

Purpose

Family members (FMs) often provide support to patients, regularly attend cancer consultations and are often involved in medical decision-making. Limited research has been conducted to date to understand patients’ and FMs’ perceptions about family involvement in cancer consultations. Therefore, this study aimed to qualitatively explore the attitudes and experiences of Australian cancer patients and FMs regarding (1) family attendance at consultations, (2) family roles in consultations and (3) the challenges of family involvement.

Methods

Thirty patients and 33 FMs, recruited through either a tertiary metropolitan oncology clinic or national cancer patient advocacy group, participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analysed using Framework analysis methods.

Results

Four relevant themes were identified: (1) negotiating family involvement, (2) attitudes towards the roles FMs assume, (3) challenges of family involvement and (4) family-clinician interactions. Overall, patients appreciated family involvement and valued FMs’ provision of emotional and informational support, and FMs also found benefit from participating in consultations. Some patients appreciated their FM assuming the role of ‘messenger’ between the consultation and extended family. However, a number of challenges were also reported by patients (e.g. maintaining privacy, mismatched patient-family information needs) and FMs (e.g. emotional toll of supportive roles, negative behaviours of clinicians towards FMs).

Conclusions

FMs appear to make valuable contributions to cancer consultations, and their presence can benefit both the patient and the FM themselves in many ways. However, for some FMs, attending consultations can be challenging. Study findings point to the need for psychosocial support addressing FMs’ needs and the development of communication strategies for oncology clinicians to positively engage with FMs. Further research is needed in these areas.

An accurate response rate could not be determined for participants recruited through the advocacy group as numbers receiving the invitation email were not recorded. All participants who returned a questionnaire completed the interview.

Repetto L, Piselli P, Raffaele M, Locatelli C (2009) Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient—a GIOGer study. Eur J Cancer 45(3):374–383CrossRefPubMed

Eggly S, Penner LA, Greene M, Harper FW, Ruckdeschel JC, Albrecht TL (2006) Information seeking during “bad news” oncology interactions: question asking by patients and their companions. Soc Sci Med 63(11):2974–2985CrossRefPubMed

Street RL, Gordon HS (2008) Companion participation in cancer consultations. Psycho-Oncology 17(3):244–251CrossRefPubMed

Schäfer C, Putnik K, Dietl B, Leiberich P, Loew TH, Kölbl O (2006) Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey. Support Care Cancer 14(9):952–959CrossRefPubMed

Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Lam W, Jansen J, McCaffery K, Shepherd H, Tattersall M (2013) Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns 91(1):3–13CrossRefPubMed

Wolff JL, Roter DL (2011) Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review. Soc Sci Med 72(6):823–831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kimberlin C, Brushwood D, Allen W, Radson E, Wilson D (2004) Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues. J Pain Symptom Manag 28(6):566–578CrossRef

Speice J, Harkness J, Laneri H, Frankel R, Roter D, Kornblith A, Ahles T, Winer E, Fleishman S, Luber P (2000) Involving family members in cancer care: focus group considerations of patients and oncological providers. Psycho-Oncology 9(2):101–112CrossRefPubMed

Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C (2008) Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient Educ Couns 73(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed

10.

Morris SM, Thomas C (2001) The carer’s place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting? Eur J Cancer Care 10(2):87–95CrossRef

11.

Bowen GA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res 8(1):137–152CrossRef

12.

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44(5):681–692CrossRefPubMed

13.

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R (2000) Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 50(460):892–899PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):526–535CrossRefPubMed

15.

Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60(3):301–312CrossRefPubMed

16.

Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Fisher A, Juraskova I (2016) Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: a qualitative study of patient, family, and health professional attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.014

17.

Meyer DZ, Avery LM (2009) Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods 21(1):91–112CrossRef

18.

de Rosenroll A, Higuchi K, Dutton K, Murray M, Stacey D (2012) Perspectives of significant others in dialysis modality decision-making: a qualitative study. CANNT Journal 23(4):17–24

19.

Ellingson LL (2002) The roles of companions in geriatric patient–interdisciplinary oncology team interactions. J Aging Stud 16(4):361–382CrossRef

20.

Mitnick S, Leffler C, Hood VL, American College of Physicians Ethics P, Committee HR (2010) Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships. J Gen Intern Med 25(3):255–260CrossRef

21.

Jacobsen PB, Wagner LI (2012) A new quality standard: the integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1154–1159CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hodges L, Humphris G, Macfarlane G (2005) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 60(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed

23.

Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121(9):1513–1519

24.

Bee PE, Barnes P, Luker KA (2009) A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. J Clin Nurs 18(10):1379–1393CrossRefPubMed

25.

Chen SC (2014) Information needs and information sources of family caregivers of cancer patients. Aslib J Inf Manage 66(6):623–639CrossRef

26.

Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL (2005) Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(1):59–65CrossRefPubMed

27.

Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D (1999) Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives. Aust NZ J Med 29(2):207–213CrossRef

Title: Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives
Authors: Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
Phyllis Butow
Stella Bu
Alana Fisher
Ilona Juraskova
Publication date: 01-10-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3237-8

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: the economic burden of hospitalizations

Prevalence and associates of psychological distress in haematological cancer survivors

Importance of sexuality in colorectal cancer: predictors, changes, and response to an intimacy enhancement intervention

Chamomile infusion cryotherapy to prevent oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy: a pilot study

The role of “closed abdomen” hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the palliative treatment of neoplastic ascites from peritoneal carcinomatosis: report of a single-center experience

Exceptional patients and communication in cancer care—are we missing another survival factor?

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer