Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Importance of sexuality in colorectal cancer: predictors, changes, and response to an intimacy enhancement intervention

Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese, Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objectives were (1) to examine the importance of sexuality within the self-view and cross-sectional correlates for 120 colorectal cancer patients and (2) to determine whether the importance of sexuality changed for 46 colorectal cancer patients and partners participating in an intimacy enhancement intervention.

Methods

Two newly developed items assessed importance of sexuality within the self-view (1) currently and (2) before cancer; a calculated change score assessed perceived change. In the cross-sectional sample, associations between importance of sexuality and demographic and medical factors and sexual function status were examined. Intervention participants’ importance ratings before and after participation were used to calculate effect sizes.

Results

For patients, importance of sexuality before cancer was greater (M = 65.7) than current importance (M = 56.8, p = .001). Greater current importance of sexuality was associated with partnered status, non-metastatic disease, and not being in treatment. Scoring in the sexually functional range was associated with greater current importance of sexuality for men and a smaller perceived change in importance for both men and women (p values <.05). Sexual function status also significantly predicted current importance independent of covariates. Small to medium effect sizes for intervention patients (.37) and partners (.60) were found for increases in importance of sexuality. Items showed evidence of test-retest reliability and construct validity.

Conclusions

Coping with sexual concerns is important to those affected by colorectal cancer. Findings suggest that the importance of sexuality can decrease through colorectal cancer and associated sexual problems and can increase through participating in an intimacy-focused intervention.
Footnotes
1
To be consistent with the bulk of analyses, these tests were conducted among partnered patients only.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reese JB, Finan PH, Haythornthwaite JA, Kadan M, Regan KR, Herman JM, Efron J, Diaz LA Jr, Azad NS (2014) Gastrointestinal ostomies and sexual outcomes: a comparison of colorectal cancer patients by ostomy status. Support Care Cancer 22(2):461–468. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1998-x Reese JB, Finan PH, Haythornthwaite JA, Kadan M, Regan KR, Herman JM, Efron J, Diaz LA Jr, Azad NS (2014) Gastrointestinal ostomies and sexual outcomes: a comparison of colorectal cancer patients by ostomy status. Support Care Cancer 22(2):461–468. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-013-1998-x
2.
3.
go back to reference da Silva GM, Hull T, Roberts PL, Ruiz DE, Wexner SD, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Daniel N, Bast J, Hammel J, Sands D (2008) The effect of colorectal surgery in female sexual function, body image, self-esteem and general health: a prospective study. Ann Surg 248(2):266–272. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181820cf4 CrossRefPubMed da Silva GM, Hull T, Roberts PL, Ruiz DE, Wexner SD, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Daniel N, Bast J, Hammel J, Sands D (2008) The effect of colorectal surgery in female sexual function, body image, self-esteem and general health: a prospective study. Ann Surg 248(2):266–272. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181820cf4​ CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Traa MJ, Orsini RG, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Bosman SJ, Dudink RL, Rutten HJ (2014) Measuring the health-related quality of life and sexual functioning of patients with rectal cancer: does type of treatment matter? Int J Cancer 134(4):979–987. doi:10.1002/ijc.28430 CrossRefPubMed Traa MJ, Orsini RG, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Bosman SJ, Dudink RL, Rutten HJ (2014) Measuring the health-related quality of life and sexual functioning of patients with rectal cancer: does type of treatment matter? Int J Cancer 134(4):979–987. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​28430 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Olsson C, Athlin E, Sandin-Bojo AK, Larsson M (2013) Sexuality is not a priority when disease and treatment side effects are severe: conceptions of patients with malignant blood diseases. J Clin Nurs 22(23–24):3503–3512. doi:10.1111/jocn.12333 CrossRefPubMed Olsson C, Athlin E, Sandin-Bojo AK, Larsson M (2013) Sexuality is not a priority when disease and treatment side effects are severe: conceptions of patients with malignant blood diseases. J Clin Nurs 22(23–24):3503–3512. doi:10.​1111/​jocn.​12333 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Herman JM, Narang AK, Griffith KA, Zalupski MM, Reese JB, Gearhart SL, Azad NS, Chan J, Olsen L, Efron JE, Lawrence TS, Ben-Josef E (2013) The quality-of-life effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(1):e15–e19. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.006 CrossRefPubMed Herman JM, Narang AK, Griffith KA, Zalupski MM, Reese JB, Gearhart SL, Azad NS, Chan J, Olsen L, Efron JE, Lawrence TS, Ben-Josef E (2013) The quality-of-life effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(1):e15–e19. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2012.​09.​006 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Epstein NB, Baucom DH (eds) (2002) Enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy for couples: a contextual approach. American Psychological Association (APA), Washington D.C. Epstein NB, Baucom DH (eds) (2002) Enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy for couples: a contextual approach. American Psychological Association (APA), Washington D.C.
16.
go back to reference Masters WH, Johnson VE (1970) Human sexual inadequacy. Little Brown & Company, Boston Masters WH, Johnson VE (1970) Human sexual inadequacy. Little Brown & Company, Boston
17.
go back to reference Barsky Reese J, Porter LS, Regan KR, Keefe FJ, Azad NS, Diaz LA Jr, Herman JM, Haythornthwaite JA (2014) A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Psychooncology 23(9):1005–1013. doi:10.1002/pon.3508 Barsky Reese J, Porter LS, Regan KR, Keefe FJ, Azad NS, Diaz LA Jr, Herman JM, Haythornthwaite JA (2014) A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Psychooncology 23(9):1005–1013. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3508
18.
go back to reference Bandura A (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T (eds) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. IAP-Information Age Publishing Inc., Greenwich, CT, pp. 307–338 Bandura A (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T (eds) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. IAP-Information Age Publishing Inc., Greenwich, CT, pp. 307–338
19.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597 Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208. doi:10.​1080/​009262300278597
22.
go back to reference Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20CrossRefPubMed Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830CrossRefPubMed Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12):2689–2700. doi:10.1002/cncr.21537 CrossRefPubMed Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12):2689–2700. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​21537 CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL (1994) Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med 10(2):77–84PubMed Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL (1994) Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med 10(2):77–84PubMed
30.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, United States Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, United States
31.
go back to reference Milbury K, Cohen L, Jenkins R, Skibber J, Schover L (2013) The association between psychosocial and medical factors with long-term sexual dysfunction after treatment for colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(3):793–802. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1582-9 CrossRefPubMed Milbury K, Cohen L, Jenkins R, Skibber J, Schover L (2013) The association between psychosocial and medical factors with long-term sexual dysfunction after treatment for colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(3):793–802. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-012-1582-9 CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Flynn KE, Lindau ST, Lin L, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, Carter J, Baron SR, Abramsohn EM, Weinfurt KP (2015) Development and validation of a single-item screener for self-reporting sexual problems in U.S. Adults J Gen Intern Med 30(10):1468–1475. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3333-3 CrossRefPubMed Flynn KE, Lindau ST, Lin L, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, Carter J, Baron SR, Abramsohn EM, Weinfurt KP (2015) Development and validation of a single-item screener for self-reporting sexual problems in U.S. Adults J Gen Intern Med 30(10):1468–1475. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-015-3333-3 CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Ussher JM, Perz J, Kellett A, Chambers S, Latini D, Davis ID, Rose D, Dowsett GW, Williams S (2016) Health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and sexual changes following prostate cancer: a comparison of gay and bisexual men with heterosexual men. J Sex Med 13(3):425–434. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.026 CrossRefPubMed Ussher JM, Perz J, Kellett A, Chambers S, Latini D, Davis ID, Rose D, Dowsett GW, Williams S (2016) Health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and sexual changes following prostate cancer: a comparison of gay and bisexual men with heterosexual men. J Sex Med 13(3):425–434. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jsxm.​2015.​12.​026 CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Boehmer U, Potter J, Bowen DJ (2009) Sexual functioning after cancer in sexual minority women. Cancer J 15(1):65–69CrossRefPubMed Boehmer U, Potter J, Bowen DJ (2009) Sexual functioning after cancer in sexual minority women. Cancer J 15(1):65–69CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Gilbert E, Ussher JM, Hawkins Y (2009) Accounts of disruptions to sexuality following cancer: the perspective of informal carers who are partners of a person with cancer. Health (London) 13(5):523–541. doi:10.1177/1363459308336795 CrossRef Gilbert E, Ussher JM, Hawkins Y (2009) Accounts of disruptions to sexuality following cancer: the perspective of informal carers who are partners of a person with cancer. Health (London) 13(5):523–541. doi:10.​1177/​1363459308336795​ CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York
Metadata
Title
Importance of sexuality in colorectal cancer: predictors, changes, and response to an intimacy enhancement intervention
Authors
Jennifer Barsky Reese
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3265-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine