Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Heart and Vessels 1/2023

19-07-2022 | Atrial Flutter | Original Article

Ablation index-guided high-power vs. moderate-power cavotricuspid isthmus ablation

Authors: Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Keisuke Usuda, Takashi Kusayama, Toyonobu Tsuda, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura

Published in: Heart and Vessels | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation is useful for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. However, the impact of radiofrequency (RF) application power on CTI ablation with a fixed target AI remains unclear. One-hundred-thirty drug-refractory atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter patients who underwent AI-guided CTI ablation with or without PVI between July 2020 and August 2021 were randomly assigned to high-power (45 W) and moderate-power (35 W) groups. We performed CTI ablation with the same target AI value in both groups: 500 for the anterior 1/3 segments and 450 for the posterior 2/3 segments. In total, first-pass conduction block of the CTI was obtained in 111 patients (85.4%), with 7 patients (5.4%) showing CTI reconnection. The rate of first-pass conduction block was significantly higher in the 45 W group (61/65, 93.8%) than in the 35 W group (50/65, 76.9%, P = 0.01). CTI ablation and CTI fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter in the 45 W group than in the 35 W group (CTI ablation time: 192.3 ± 84.8 vs. 319.8 ± 171.4 s, P < 0.0001; CTI fluoroscopy time: 125.2 ± 122.4 vs. 171.2 ± 124.0 s, P = 0.039). Although there was no significant difference, steam pops were identified in two patients from the 45 W group at the anterior segment of the CTI. The 45 W ablation strategy was faster and provided a higher probability of first-pass conduction block than the 35 W ablation strategy for CTI ablation with a fixed AI target.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Asirvatham SJ (2009) Correlative anatomy and electrophysiology for the interventional electrophysiologist: right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20:113–122CrossRef Asirvatham SJ (2009) Correlative anatomy and electrophysiology for the interventional electrophysiologist: right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20:113–122CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM (2014) Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:1174–1180CrossRef Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM (2014) Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:1174–1180CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Das M, Loveday JJ, Wynn GJ, Gomes S, Saeed Y, Bonnett LJ, Waktare JEP, Todd DM, Hall MCS, Snowdon RL, Modi S, Gupta D (2017) Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace 19:775–783 Das M, Loveday JJ, Wynn GJ, Gomes S, Saeed Y, Bonnett LJ, Waktare JEP, Todd DM, Hall MCS, Snowdon RL, Modi S, Gupta D (2017) Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace 19:775–783
4.
go back to reference Hussein A, Das M, Chaturvedi V, Asfour IK, Daryanani N, Morgan M, Ronayne C, Shaw M, Snowdon R, Gupta D (2017) Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:1037–1047CrossRef Hussein A, Das M, Chaturvedi V, Asfour IK, Daryanani N, Morgan M, Ronayne C, Shaw M, Snowdon R, Gupta D (2017) Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:1037–1047CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M (2018) Evaluation of a strategy aiming to enclose the pulmonary veins with contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:99–108CrossRef Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M (2018) Evaluation of a strategy aiming to enclose the pulmonary veins with contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:99–108CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhang T, Wang Y, Han Z, Zhao H, Liang Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, Ren X (2019) Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using ablation index in typical right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2414–2419CrossRef Zhang T, Wang Y, Han Z, Zhao H, Liang Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, Ren X (2019) Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using ablation index in typical right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2414–2419CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Viola G, Stabile G, Bandino S, Rossi L, Marrazzo N, Pecora D, Bottoni N, Solimene F, Schillaci V, Scaglione M, Ocello S, Baiocchi C, Santoro A, Donzelli S, De Ruvo E, Lavalle C, Sanchez-Gomez JM, Pastor JFA, Grandio PC, Ferraris F, Castro A, Rebellato L, Marchese P, Adao L, Primo J, Barra S, Casu G (2021) Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study. Europace 23:264–270CrossRef Viola G, Stabile G, Bandino S, Rossi L, Marrazzo N, Pecora D, Bottoni N, Solimene F, Schillaci V, Scaglione M, Ocello S, Baiocchi C, Santoro A, Donzelli S, De Ruvo E, Lavalle C, Sanchez-Gomez JM, Pastor JFA, Grandio PC, Ferraris F, Castro A, Rebellato L, Marchese P, Adao L, Primo J, Barra S, Casu G (2021) Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study. Europace 23:264–270CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD (2019) Low complication rates using high power (45–50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm 16:165–169CrossRef Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD (2019) Low complication rates using high power (45–50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm 16:165–169CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berte B, Hilfiker G, Russi I, Moccetti F, Cuculi F, Toggweiler S, Ruschitzka F, Kobza R (2019) Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2199–2204CrossRef Berte B, Hilfiker G, Russi I, Moccetti F, Cuculi F, Toggweiler S, Ruschitzka F, Kobza R (2019) Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2199–2204CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Winkle RA (2021) HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 32:2813–2823CrossRef Winkle RA (2021) HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 32:2813–2823CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ravi V, Poudyal A, Abid QU, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Sharma PS, Trohman RG, Huang HD (2021) High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 23:710–721CrossRef Ravi V, Poudyal A, Abid QU, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Sharma PS, Trohman RG, Huang HD (2021) High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 23:710–721CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Okamatsu H, Koyama J, Sakai Y, Negishi K, Hayashi K, Tsurugi T, Tanaka Y, Nakao K, Sakamoto T, Okumura K (2019) High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2751–2758CrossRef Okamatsu H, Koyama J, Sakai Y, Negishi K, Hayashi K, Tsurugi T, Tanaka Y, Nakao K, Sakamoto T, Okumura K (2019) High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2751–2758CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Lavergne T, Lafitte S, Le Mouroux A, Fischer B, Clémenty J (1998) Successful irrigated-tip catheter ablation of atrial flutter resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 98:835–838CrossRef Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Lavergne T, Lafitte S, Le Mouroux A, Fischer B, Clémenty J (1998) Successful irrigated-tip catheter ablation of atrial flutter resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 98:835–838CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Atiga WL, Worley SJ, Hummel J, Berger RD, Gohn DC, Mandalakas NJ, Kalbfleisch S, Halperin H, Donahue K, Tomaselli G, Calkins H, Daoud E (2002) Prospective randomized comparison of cooled radiofrequency versus standard radiofrequency energy for ablation of typical atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1172–1178CrossRef Atiga WL, Worley SJ, Hummel J, Berger RD, Gohn DC, Mandalakas NJ, Kalbfleisch S, Halperin H, Donahue K, Tomaselli G, Calkins H, Daoud E (2002) Prospective randomized comparison of cooled radiofrequency versus standard radiofrequency energy for ablation of typical atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1172–1178CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scavée C, Jaïs P, Hsu LF, Sanders P, Hocini M, Weerasooriya R, Macle L, Raybaud F, Clementy J, Haïssaguerre M (2004) Prospective randomised comparison of irrigated-tip and large-tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Eur Heart J 25:963–969CrossRef Scavée C, Jaïs P, Hsu LF, Sanders P, Hocini M, Weerasooriya R, Macle L, Raybaud F, Clementy J, Haïssaguerre M (2004) Prospective randomised comparison of irrigated-tip and large-tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Eur Heart J 25:963–969CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ventura R, Klemm H, Lutomsky B, Demir C, Rostock T, Weiss C, Meinertz T, Willems S (2004) Pattern of isthmus conduction recovery using open cooled and solid large-tip catheters for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:1126–1130CrossRef Ventura R, Klemm H, Lutomsky B, Demir C, Rostock T, Weiss C, Meinertz T, Willems S (2004) Pattern of isthmus conduction recovery using open cooled and solid large-tip catheters for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:1126–1130CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ilg KJ, Kühne M, Crawford T, Chugh A, Jongnarangsin K, Good E, Pelosi F Jr, Bogun F, Morady F, Oral H (2011) Randomized comparison of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter using an open irrigation-tip versus a large-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:1007–1012CrossRef Ilg KJ, Kühne M, Crawford T, Chugh A, Jongnarangsin K, Good E, Pelosi F Jr, Bogun F, Morady F, Oral H (2011) Randomized comparison of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter using an open irrigation-tip versus a large-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:1007–1012CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Saremi F, Pourzand L, Krishnan S, Ashikyan O, Gurudevan SV, Narula J, Kaushal K, Raney A (2008) Right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus: anatomic characterization with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 247:658–668CrossRef Saremi F, Pourzand L, Krishnan S, Ashikyan O, Gurudevan SV, Narula J, Kaushal K, Raney A (2008) Right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus: anatomic characterization with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 247:658–668CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kajihara K, Nakano Y, Hirai Y, Ogi H, Oda N, Suenari K, Makita Y, Sairaku A, Tokuyama T, Motoda C, Fujiwara M, Watanabe Y, Kiguchi M, Kihara Y (2013) Variable procedural strategies adapted to anatomical characteristics in catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a preoperative multidetector computed tomography analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24:1344–1351CrossRef Kajihara K, Nakano Y, Hirai Y, Ogi H, Oda N, Suenari K, Makita Y, Sairaku A, Tokuyama T, Motoda C, Fujiwara M, Watanabe Y, Kiguchi M, Kihara Y (2013) Variable procedural strategies adapted to anatomical characteristics in catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a preoperative multidetector computed tomography analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24:1344–1351CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chikata A, Kato T, Usuda K, Fujita S, Maruyama M, Otowa KI, Takashima SI, Murai H, Usui S, Furusho H, Kaneko S, Takamura M (2019) Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Vessels 34:1710–1716CrossRef Chikata A, Kato T, Usuda K, Fujita S, Maruyama M, Otowa KI, Takashima SI, Murai H, Usui S, Furusho H, Kaneko S, Takamura M (2019) Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Vessels 34:1710–1716CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Baccillieri MS, Rizzo S, De Gaspari M, Paradiso B, Thiene G, Verlato R, Basso C (2019) Anatomy of the cavotricuspid isthmus for radiofrequency ablation in typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm 16:1611–1618CrossRef Baccillieri MS, Rizzo S, De Gaspari M, Paradiso B, Thiene G, Verlato R, Basso C (2019) Anatomy of the cavotricuspid isthmus for radiofrequency ablation in typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm 16:1611–1618CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kwon HJ, Lee SS, Park YJ, Park SJ, Park KM, Kim JS, On YK (2020) Effectiveness and safety of high-power and short-duration ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 43:941–946CrossRef Kwon HJ, Lee SS, Park YJ, Park SJ, Park KM, Kim JS, On YK (2020) Effectiveness and safety of high-power and short-duration ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 43:941–946CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Leshem E, Buxton AE, Nakagawa H, Anter E (2018) High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Safety, efficacy, and long-term durability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1287–1296CrossRef Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Leshem E, Buxton AE, Nakagawa H, Anter E (2018) High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Safety, efficacy, and long-term durability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1287–1296CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jais P (2018) High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1570–1575CrossRef Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jais P (2018) High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1570–1575CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E (2018) High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:467–479CrossRef Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E (2018) High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:467–479CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yavin HD, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, Sroubek J, Barkagan M, Haffajee CI, Cooper JM, Anter E (2020) Impact of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Long-Term Lesion Durability for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 6:973–985CrossRef Yavin HD, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, Sroubek J, Barkagan M, Haffajee CI, Cooper JM, Anter E (2020) Impact of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Long-Term Lesion Durability for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 6:973–985CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ablation index-guided high-power vs. moderate-power cavotricuspid isthmus ablation
Authors
Akio Chikata
Takeshi Kato
Kazuo Usuda
Shuhei Fujita
Michiro Maruyama
Kanichi Otowa
Keisuke Usuda
Takashi Kusayama
Toyonobu Tsuda
Kenshi Hayashi
Masayuki Takamura
Publication date
19-07-2022
Publisher
Springer Japan
Keyword
Atrial Flutter
Published in
Heart and Vessels / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0910-8327
Electronic ISSN: 1615-2573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02125-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Heart and Vessels 1/2023 Go to the issue