Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2022

24-06-2022 | Atrial Fibrillation

Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation with 90 W for 4 s: outcome, safety, biophysical characteristics and cranial MRI findings in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation

Authors: M. Kottmaier, L. Förschner, N. Harfoush, F. Bourier, S. Mayr, T. Reents, E. Klupp, C. Zimmer, M. Hadamitzki, E. Hendrick, H. Krafft, S. Lengauer, S. Maurer, M. Telishevska, M. Popa, C. Lennerz, G. Hessling, I. Deisenhofer

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot™ catheter is a novel contact force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90 W/4 s lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Methods

We included n = 48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature-controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90 W/4 s (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation, the ablation mode was changed to 50 W/15 s (QMode). N = 23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions.

Results

Mean RF time was 8.1 ± 2.8 min, and procedure duration was 84.5 ± 30 min. The overall maximal measured catheter tip temperature was 52.0 °C ± 4.6 °C, mean overall applied current was 871 mA ± 44 mA and overall applied energy was 316 J ± 47 J. The mean local impedance drop was 12.1 ± 2.4 Ohms. During adenosine challenge, n = 14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n = 24 steam pops were detected in n = 18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n = 4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion.

Conclusions

TC-HPSD ablation with 90 W/4 s using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment, steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them leads to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, de Groot N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, de Groot N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S. investigators At: Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.CrossRefPubMed Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S. investigators At: Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Anter E, Contreras-Valdes FM, Shvilkin A, Tschabrunn CM, Josephson ME. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:225–32.CrossRefPubMed Anter E, Contreras-Valdes FM, Shvilkin A, Tschabrunn CM, Josephson ME. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:225–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:467–79.CrossRefPubMed Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:467–79.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yavin H, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, et al. Impact of high-power short-duration radio- frequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2020;6:973–85. Yavin H, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, et al. Impact of high-power short-duration radio- frequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2020;6:973–85.
7.
go back to reference Reddy VY, Grimaldi M, De Potter T, Vijgen JM, Bulava A, Duytschaever MF, Martinek M, Natale A, Knecht S, Neuzil P, Pürerfellner H. Pulmonary vein isolation with very high power, short duration, temperature-controlled lesions: the QDOT-FAST trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(7):778–86.CrossRefPubMed Reddy VY, Grimaldi M, De Potter T, Vijgen JM, Bulava A, Duytschaever MF, Martinek M, Natale A, Knecht S, Neuzil P, Pürerfellner H. Pulmonary vein isolation with very high power, short duration, temperature-controlled lesions: the QDOT-FAST trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(7):778–86.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, Sarembock IJ, Cohen DJ, Spriggs D, Ebrahimi R, Keren G, Carr J, Cohen EA, Betriu A, Desmet W, Kereiakes DJ, Rutsch W, Wilcox RG, de Feyter PJ, Vahanian A, Topol EJ. Investigators R-: Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.CrossRefPubMed Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, Sarembock IJ, Cohen DJ, Spriggs D, Ebrahimi R, Keren G, Carr J, Cohen EA, Betriu A, Desmet W, Kereiakes DJ, Rutsch W, Wilcox RG, de Feyter PJ, Vahanian A, Topol EJ. Investigators R-: Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kottmaier M, Bourier F, Pausch H, Reents T, Semmler V, Telishevska M, Koch-Buttner K, Lennerz C, Lengauer S, Kornmayer M, Rousseva E, Brooks S, Brkic A, Ammar-Busch S, Kaess B, Dillier R, Grebmer C, Kolb C, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. Safety of uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban versus phenprocoumon for patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:445–9.CrossRefPubMed Kottmaier M, Bourier F, Pausch H, Reents T, Semmler V, Telishevska M, Koch-Buttner K, Lennerz C, Lengauer S, Kornmayer M, Rousseva E, Brooks S, Brkic A, Ammar-Busch S, Kaess B, Dillier R, Grebmer C, Kolb C, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. Safety of uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban versus phenprocoumon for patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:445–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S and investigators At. Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9. Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S and investigators At. Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.
11.
go back to reference Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(11):1570–5.CrossRefPubMed Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(11):1570–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Deneke T, Halbfaß P, Pürerfellner H. High-power short duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: simply cranking up the energy? Europace. 2020;22(3):335–7.CrossRefPubMed Deneke T, Halbfaß P, Pürerfellner H. High-power short duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: simply cranking up the energy? Europace. 2020;22(3):335–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, Schmitt R, Di Biase L, Christopoulos G, Schade A, Mügge A, Bansmann M, Nentwich K, Müller P, Krug J, Roos M, Halbfass P, Natale A, Gaita F, Haines D. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–63.CrossRefPubMed Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, Schmitt R, Di Biase L, Christopoulos G, Schade A, Mügge A, Bansmann M, Nentwich K, Müller P, Krug J, Roos M, Halbfass P, Natale A, Gaita F, Haines D. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–63.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, Fuimaono K, Datta K, Joshi H, Constantin M, Bourier F, Cheniti G, Duchateau J, Pambrun T, Denis A, Derval N, Sacher F, Cochet H, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P. Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation: comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(4):553–61.CrossRefPubMed Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, Fuimaono K, Datta K, Joshi H, Constantin M, Bourier F, Cheniti G, Duchateau J, Pambrun T, Denis A, Derval N, Sacher F, Cochet H, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P. Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation: comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(4):553–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation with 90 W for 4 s: outcome, safety, biophysical characteristics and cranial MRI findings in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation
Authors
M. Kottmaier
L. Förschner
N. Harfoush
F. Bourier
S. Mayr
T. Reents
E. Klupp
C. Zimmer
M. Hadamitzki
E. Hendrick
H. Krafft
S. Lengauer
S. Maurer
M. Telishevska
M. Popa
C. Lennerz
G. Hessling
I. Deisenhofer
Publication date
24-06-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01146-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2022 Go to the issue